[management] Optimize affected posture checks and add logs (#6522)

client/internal/dns/mgmt/mgmt.go

@@ -51,13 +51,20 @@ type cachedRecord struct {
 }
 
 // Resolver caches critical NetBird infrastructure domains.
-// records, refreshing, mgmtDomain and serverDomains are all guarded by mutex.
+// records, refreshing, failedResolves, mgmtDomain and serverDomains are all
+// guarded by mutex.
 type Resolver struct {
 	records       map[dns.Question]*cachedRecord
 	mgmtDomain    *domain.Domain
 	serverDomains *dnsconfig.ServerDomains
 	mutex         sync.RWMutex
 
+	// failedResolves records the last failed initial resolve per domain so a
+	// domain that never resolves isn't retried on every server-domains update
+	// until refreshBackoff elapses. Entries are cleared on success and pruned
+	// to the current server-domains set.
+	failedResolves map[domain.Domain]time.Time
+
 	chain            ChainResolver
 	chainMaxPriority int
 	refreshGroup     singleflight.Group
@@ -76,9 +83,10 @@ type Resolver struct {
 // NewResolver creates a new management domains cache resolver.
 func NewResolver() *Resolver {
 	return &Resolver{
-		records:    make(map[dns.Question]*cachedRecord),
-		refreshing: make(map[dns.Question]*atomic.Bool),
-		cacheTTL:   resolveCacheTTL(),
+		records:        make(map[dns.Question]*cachedRecord),
+		refreshing:     make(map[dns.Question]*atomic.Bool),
+		failedResolves: make(map[domain.Domain]time.Time),
+		cacheTTL:       resolveCacheTTL(),
 	}
 }
 
@@ -173,7 +181,9 @@ func (m *Resolver) continueToNext(w dns.ResponseWriter, r *dns.Msg) {
 
 // AddDomain resolves a domain and stores its A/AAAA records in the cache.
 // A family that resolves NODATA (nil err, zero records) evicts any stale
-// entry for that qtype.
+// entry for that qtype. When one family hard-errors while the other succeeds,
+// the resolved family is still cached but AddDomain returns an error so the
+// caller retries the incomplete resolve rather than treating it as complete.
 func (m *Resolver) AddDomain(ctx context.Context, d domain.Domain) error {
 	dnsName := strings.ToLower(dns.Fqdn(d.PunycodeString()))
 
@@ -203,6 +213,10 @@ func (m *Resolver) AddDomain(ctx context.Context, d domain.Domain) error {
 	log.Debugf("added/updated domain=%s with %d A records and %d AAAA records",
 		d.SafeString(), len(aRecords), len(aaaaRecords))
 
+	if errA != nil || errAAAA != nil {
+		return fmt.Errorf("resolve %s: incomplete, a family failed: %w", d.SafeString(), errors.Join(errA, errAAAA))
+	}
+
 	return nil
 }
 
@@ -462,6 +476,7 @@ func (m *Resolver) RemoveDomain(d domain.Domain) error {
 	delete(m.records, qAAAA)
 	delete(m.refreshing, qA)
 	delete(m.refreshing, qAAAA)
+	delete(m.failedResolves, d)
 
 	log.Debugf("removed domain=%s from cache", d.SafeString())
 	return nil
@@ -505,6 +520,7 @@ func (m *Resolver) UpdateFromServerDomains(ctx context.Context, serverDomains dn
 		allDomains := m.extractDomainsFromServerDomains(updatedServerDomains)
 		currentDomains := m.GetCachedDomains()
 		removedDomains = m.removeStaleDomains(currentDomains, allDomains)
+		m.pruneFailedResolves(allDomains)
 	}
 
 	m.addNewDomains(ctx, newDomains)
@@ -577,13 +593,85 @@ func (m *Resolver) isManagementDomain(domain domain.Domain) bool {
 	return m.mgmtDomain != nil && domain == *m.mgmtDomain
 }
 
-// addNewDomains resolves and caches all domains from the update
+// addNewDomains resolves and caches domains that are not yet in the cache,
+// running the lookups concurrently. Domains already cached are skipped and left
+// to the stale-while-revalidate refresh path, so a sync never re-resolves them
+// synchronously: once NetBird owns the OS resolver the resolve runs through the
+// handler chain and would otherwise dial the managed upstreams under the engine
+// sync lock on every update.
 func (m *Resolver) addNewDomains(ctx context.Context, newDomains domain.List) {
+	var wg sync.WaitGroup
+	seen := make(map[domain.Domain]struct{}, len(newDomains))
 	for _, newDomain := range newDomains {
-		if err := m.AddDomain(ctx, newDomain); err != nil {
-			log.Warnf("failed to add/update domain=%s: %v", newDomain.SafeString(), err)
-		} else {
-			log.Debugf("added/updated management cache domain=%s", newDomain.SafeString())
+		if _, dup := seen[newDomain]; dup {
+			continue
+		}
+		seen[newDomain] = struct{}{}
+
+		if !m.needsResolve(newDomain) {
+			continue
+		}
+
+		wg.Add(1)
+		go func(d domain.Domain) {
+			defer wg.Done()
+			if err := m.AddDomain(ctx, d); err != nil {
+				m.markResolveFailed(d)
+				log.Warnf("failed to add/update domain=%s: %v", d.SafeString(), err)
+				return
+			}
+			m.clearResolveFailed(d)
+			log.Debugf("added/updated management cache domain=%s", d.SafeString())
+		}(newDomain)
+	}
+	wg.Wait()
+}
+
+// needsResolve reports whether d should be resolved now. A recent failed or
+// incomplete resolve gates retries on the backoff even when one family is
+// already cached, so a transiently-failed family is retried instead of being
+// treated as fully resolved. Otherwise a domain with any cached record is left
+// to the stale-while-revalidate refresh path.
+func (m *Resolver) needsResolve(d domain.Domain) bool {
+	dnsName := strings.ToLower(dns.Fqdn(d.PunycodeString()))
+
+	m.mutex.RLock()
+	defer m.mutex.RUnlock()
+
+	if failedAt, ok := m.failedResolves[d]; ok {
+		return time.Since(failedAt) >= refreshBackoff
+	}
+
+	for _, qtype := range []uint16{dns.TypeA, dns.TypeAAAA} {
+		q := dns.Question{Name: dnsName, Qtype: qtype, Qclass: dns.ClassINET}
+		if _, ok := m.records[q]; ok {
+			return false
+		}
+	}
+	return true
+}
+
+func (m *Resolver) markResolveFailed(d domain.Domain) {
+	m.mutex.Lock()
+	m.failedResolves[d] = time.Now()
+	m.mutex.Unlock()
+}
+
+func (m *Resolver) clearResolveFailed(d domain.Domain) {
+	m.mutex.Lock()
+	delete(m.failedResolves, d)
+	m.mutex.Unlock()
+}
+
+// pruneFailedResolves drops failure markers for domains no longer present in
+// the server-domains set, keeping the map bounded to the current set (a
+// failed-only domain has no cached record, so RemoveDomain never sees it).
+func (m *Resolver) pruneFailedResolves(domains domain.List) {
+	m.mutex.Lock()
+	defer m.mutex.Unlock()
+	for d := range m.failedResolves {
+		if !slices.Contains(domains, d) {
+			delete(m.failedResolves, d)
 		}
 	}
 }

client/internal/dns/mgmt/mgmt_refresh_test.go

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ type fakeChain struct {
 	mu       sync.Mutex
 	calls    map[string]int
 	answers  map[string][]dns.RR
+	qErr     map[string]error
 	err      error
 	hasRoot  bool
 	onLookup func()
@@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ func newFakeChain() *fakeChain {
 	return &fakeChain{
 		calls:   map[string]int{},
 		answers: map[string][]dns.RR{},
+		qErr:    map[string]error{},
 		hasRoot: true,
 	}
 }
@@ -47,6 +49,9 @@ func (f *fakeChain) ResolveInternal(ctx context.Context, msg *dns.Msg, maxPriori
 	f.calls[key]++
 	answers := f.answers[key]
 	err := f.err
+	if err == nil {
+		err = f.qErr[key]
+	}
 	onLookup := f.onLookup
 	f.mu.Unlock()
 
@@ -75,6 +80,12 @@ func (f *fakeChain) setAnswer(name string, qtype uint16, ip string) {
 	}
 }
 
+func (f *fakeChain) setErr(name string, qtype uint16, err error) {
+	f.mu.Lock()
+	defer f.mu.Unlock()
+	f.qErr[name+"|"+dns.TypeToString[qtype]] = err
+}
+
 func (f *fakeChain) callCount(name string, qtype uint16) int {
 	f.mu.Lock()
 	defer f.mu.Unlock()

client/internal/dns/mgmt/mgmt_resolve_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+package mgmt
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"errors"
+	"sync/atomic"
+	"testing"
+	"time"
+
+	"github.com/miekg/dns"
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+
+	dnsconfig "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/dns/config"
+	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/shared/management/domain"
+)
+
+// A domain already in the cache must not be re-resolved on a subsequent server
+// domains update; it is left to the stale-while-revalidate refresh path.
+func TestResolver_UpdateFromServerDomains_SkipsCached(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewResolver()
+	chain := newFakeChain()
+	chain.setAnswer("signal.example.com.", dns.TypeA, "10.0.0.2")
+	r.SetChainResolver(chain, 50)
+
+	sd := dnsconfig.ServerDomains{Signal: domain.Domain("signal.example.com")}
+
+	_, err := r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), sd)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	require.Equal(t, 1, chain.callCount("signal.example.com.", dns.TypeA),
+		"first update must resolve the domain")
+
+	_, err = r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), sd)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	assert.Equal(t, 1, chain.callCount("signal.example.com.", dns.TypeA),
+		"cached domain must not be re-resolved on a subsequent update")
+}
+
+// New domains in a single update must resolve concurrently rather than serially.
+func TestResolver_AddNewDomains_ResolvesConcurrently(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewResolver()
+	chain := newFakeChain()
+
+	var inflight, maxInflight atomic.Int32
+	chain.onLookup = func() {
+		n := inflight.Add(1)
+		for {
+			old := maxInflight.Load()
+			if n <= old || maxInflight.CompareAndSwap(old, n) {
+				break
+			}
+		}
+		time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
+		inflight.Add(-1)
+	}
+
+	relays := []domain.Domain{"a.example.com", "b.example.com", "c.example.com", "d.example.com"}
+	for _, d := range relays {
+		chain.setAnswer(dns.Fqdn(string(d)), dns.TypeA, "10.0.0.2")
+	}
+	r.SetChainResolver(chain, 50)
+
+	start := time.Now()
+	_, err := r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), dnsconfig.ServerDomains{Relay: relays})
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	elapsed := time.Since(start)
+
+	assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, int(maxInflight.Load()), 2, "domains must resolve concurrently")
+	// Serial resolution of 4 domains would take at least 4*50ms; concurrent is far less.
+	assert.Less(t, elapsed, 300*time.Millisecond, "resolution should not be serial")
+}
+
+// A domain that fails to resolve must not be retried on every update; the
+// failure backoff suppresses re-resolution until it expires.
+func TestResolver_UpdateFromServerDomains_BacksOffFailures(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewResolver()
+	chain := newFakeChain()
+	chain.err = errors.New("resolve boom")
+	r.SetChainResolver(chain, 50)
+
+	sd := dnsconfig.ServerDomains{Signal: domain.Domain("signal.example.com")}
+
+	_, err := r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), sd)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	require.Equal(t, 1, chain.callCount("signal.example.com.", dns.TypeA),
+		"first update must attempt the resolve")
+
+	_, err = r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), sd)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	assert.Equal(t, 1, chain.callCount("signal.example.com.", dns.TypeA),
+		"failed resolve must back off and not retry on the next update")
+}
+
+// A domain listed under more than one server-domain type (e.g. STUN and TURN on
+// the same host) must be resolved once per update, not once per occurrence.
+func TestResolver_AddNewDomains_DedupesDuplicateDomains(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewResolver()
+	chain := newFakeChain()
+	chain.setAnswer("dup.example.com.", dns.TypeA, "10.0.0.9")
+	r.SetChainResolver(chain, 50)
+
+	sd := dnsconfig.ServerDomains{
+		Stuns: []domain.Domain{"dup.example.com"},
+		Turns: []domain.Domain{"dup.example.com"},
+	}
+
+	_, err := r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), sd)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	assert.Equal(t, 1, chain.callCount("dup.example.com.", dns.TypeA),
+		"a domain appearing under multiple server-domain types must resolve once")
+}
+
+// A failure marker must be dropped once its domain leaves the server-domains set
+// so the map stays bounded to the current set.
+func TestResolver_UpdateFromServerDomains_PrunesFailedResolves(t *testing.T) {
+	r := NewResolver()
+	chain := newFakeChain()
+	chain.err = errors.New("resolve boom")
+	r.SetChainResolver(chain, 50)
+
+	_, err := r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), dnsconfig.ServerDomains{Signal: domain.Domain("gone.example.com")})
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	r.mutex.RLock()
+	_, marked := r.failedResolves[domain.Domain("gone.example.com")]
+	r.mutex.RUnlock()
+	require.True(t, marked, "failed resolve must be recorded")
+
+	_, err = r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), dnsconfig.ServerDomains{Signal: domain.Domain("other.example.com")})
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	r.mutex.RLock()
+	_, stillMarked := r.failedResolves[domain.Domain("gone.example.com")]
+	r.mutex.RUnlock()
+	assert.False(t, stillMarked, "failure marker for a domain no longer in the set must be pruned")
+}
+
+// When one family hard-errors while the other resolves, the domain is cached
+// for the working family but recorded as incomplete so the failed family is
+// retried under backoff instead of being treated as fully resolved forever.
+func TestResolver_AddNewDomains_RetriesPartialFamilyFailure(t *testing.T) {
+	d := domain.Domain("relay.example.com")
+	r := NewResolver()
+	chain := newFakeChain()
+	chain.setAnswer("relay.example.com.", dns.TypeA, "10.0.0.2")
+	chain.setErr("relay.example.com.", dns.TypeAAAA, errors.New("servfail"))
+	r.SetChainResolver(chain, 50)
+
+	_, err := r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), dnsconfig.ServerDomains{Relay: []domain.Domain{d}})
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	r.mutex.RLock()
+	_, aCached := r.records[dns.Question{Name: "relay.example.com.", Qtype: dns.TypeA, Qclass: dns.ClassINET}]
+	_, marked := r.failedResolves[d]
+	r.mutex.RUnlock()
+	require.True(t, aCached, "the working family must still be cached")
+	require.True(t, marked, "a partial failure must be recorded so the failed family is retried")
+
+	assert.False(t, r.needsResolve(d), "within the backoff window the domain is not retried")
+
+	r.mutex.Lock()
+	r.failedResolves[d] = time.Now().Add(-2 * refreshBackoff)
+	r.mutex.Unlock()
+	assert.True(t, r.needsResolve(d), "after the backoff elapses the domain is retried to pick up the missing family")
+}
+
+// A family that returns NODATA (legitimately absent, e.g. an IPv4-only host) is
+// not a failure: the domain must not be marked for retry, otherwise it would be
+// re-resolved on every sync.
+func TestResolver_AddNewDomains_NodataIsNotFailure(t *testing.T) {
+	d := domain.Domain("v4only.example.com")
+	r := NewResolver()
+	chain := newFakeChain()
+	chain.setAnswer("v4only.example.com.", dns.TypeA, "10.0.0.2")
+	r.SetChainResolver(chain, 50)
+
+	_, err := r.UpdateFromServerDomains(context.Background(), dnsconfig.ServerDomains{Relay: []domain.Domain{d}})
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	r.mutex.RLock()
+	_, marked := r.failedResolves[d]
+	r.mutex.RUnlock()
+	assert.False(t, marked, "a NODATA family must not be recorded as a failure")
+	assert.False(t, r.needsResolve(d), "an IPv4-only host must not be re-resolved on later syncs")
+}

client/ui/client_ui.go

@@ -418,7 +418,14 @@ func newServiceClient(args *newServiceClientArgs) *serviceClient {
 	case args.showProfiles:
 		s.showProfilesUI()
 	case args.showQuickActions:
-		s.showQuickActionsUI()
+		// Suppress the on-boot Quick Actions popup when the daemon
+		// reports DisableAutoConnect=true — that flag carries both the
+		// user's "Connect on Startup = off" preference AND any MDM-
+		// enforced override (applyMDMPolicy writes the policy value
+		// into the same Config field). See netbirdio/netbird#5744.
+		if !s.disableAutoConnectFromDaemon() {
+			s.showQuickActionsUI()
+		}
 	case args.showUpdate:
 		s.showUpdateProgress(ctx, args.showUpdateVersion)
 	}
@@ -1338,6 +1345,40 @@ func (s *serviceClient) getFeatures() (*proto.GetFeaturesResponse, error) {
 	return features, nil
 }
 
+// disableAutoConnectFromDaemon returns true when the daemon reports
+// the active profile has DisableAutoConnect=true. Used by the
+// --quick-actions startup path to suppress the on-boot popup when the
+// user (or an MDM admin) opted out of auto-connecting; both cases
+// converge on the same Config field because applyMDMPolicy writes the
+// policy value into it. Returns false on any RPC / lookup failure so a
+// daemon hiccup does not silently swallow the popup.
+func (s *serviceClient) disableAutoConnectFromDaemon() bool {
+	activeProf, err := s.profileManager.GetActiveProfile()
+	if err != nil {
+		log.Warnf("disableAutoConnectFromDaemon: get active profile: %v", err)
+		return false
+	}
+	currUser, err := user.Current()
+	if err != nil {
+		log.Warnf("disableAutoConnectFromDaemon: get current user: %v", err)
+		return false
+	}
+	conn, err := s.getSrvClient(failFastTimeout)
+	if err != nil {
+		log.Warnf("disableAutoConnectFromDaemon: get daemon client: %v", err)
+		return false
+	}
+	srvCfg, err := conn.GetConfig(s.ctx, &proto.GetConfigRequest{
+		ProfileName: activeProf.ID.String(),
+		Username:    currUser.Username,
+	})
+	if err != nil {
+		log.Warnf("disableAutoConnectFromDaemon: GetConfig RPC: %v", err)
+		return false
+	}
+	return srvCfg.GetDisableAutoConnect()
+}
+
 // getSrvConfig from the service to show it in the settings window.
 func (s *serviceClient) getSrvConfig() {
 	s.managementURL = profilemanager.DefaultManagementURL

management/internals/controllers/network_map/controller/controller.go

@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ func (c *Controller) BufferUpdateAffectedPeers(ctx context.Context, accountID st
 		c.accountManagerMetrics.CountUpdateAccountPeersTriggered(string(reason.Resource), string(reason.Operation))
 	}
 
-	log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("buffer updating %d affected peers for account %s from %s", len(peerIDs), accountID, util.GetCallerName())
+	log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("buffer updating %d affected peers for account %s from %s with reason %s/%s", len(peerIDs), accountID, util.GetCallerName(), reason.Operation, reason.Resource)
 
 	bufUpd, _ := c.affectedPeerUpdateLocks.LoadOrStore(accountID, &bufferAffectedUpdate{
 		peerIDs: make(map[string]struct{}),
@@ -610,12 +610,10 @@ func (c *Controller) GetValidatedPeerWithMap(ctx context.Context, isRequiresAppr
 		return nil, nil, 0, err
 	}
 
-	startPosture := time.Now()
 	postureChecks, err := c.getPeerPostureChecks(account, peerID)
 	if err != nil {
 		return nil, nil, 0, err
 	}
-	log.WithContext(ctx).Debugf("getPeerPostureChecks took %s", time.Since(startPosture))
 
 	accountZones, err := c.repo.GetAccountZones(ctx, account.Id)
 	if err != nil {

management/internals/shared/grpc/loginfilter.go

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import (
 
 const (
 	reconnThreshold   = 5 * time.Minute
-	baseBlockDuration = 10 * time.Minute // Duration for which a peer is banned after exceeding the reconnection limit
+	baseBlockDuration = 30 * time.Minute // Duration for which a peer is banned after exceeding the reconnection limit
 	reconnLimitForBan = 30               // Number of reconnections within the reconnTreshold that triggers a ban
 	metaChangeLimit   = 3                // Number of reconnections with different metadata that triggers a ban of one peer
 )
@@ -139,22 +139,13 @@ func (l *loginFilter) addLogin(wgPubKey string, metaHash uint64) {
 	state.lastSeen = now
 }
 
-func metaHash(meta nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta, pubip string) uint64 {
+func metaHash(meta nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta) uint64 {
 	h := fnv.New64a()
 
-	h.Write([]byte(meta.WtVersion))
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.OSVersion))
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.KernelVersion))
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.Hostname))
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.SystemSerialNumber))
-	h.Write([]byte(pubip))
 
-	macs := uint64(0)
-	for _, na := range meta.NetworkAddresses {
-		for _, r := range na.Mac {
-			macs += uint64(r)
-		}
-	}
-
-	return h.Sum64() + macs
+	return h.Sum64()
 }

management/internals/shared/grpc/loginfilter_test.go

@@ -164,9 +164,7 @@ func BenchmarkHashingMethods(b *testing.B) {
 		KernelVersion:      "5.15.0-76-generic",
 		Hostname:           "prod-server-database-01",
 		SystemSerialNumber: "PC-1234567890",
-		NetworkAddresses:   []nbpeer.NetworkAddress{{Mac: "00:1B:44:11:3A:B7"}, {Mac: "00:1B:44:11:3A:B8"}},
 	}
-	pubip := "8.8.8.8"
 
 	var resultString string
 	var resultUint uint64
@@ -175,7 +173,7 @@ func BenchmarkHashingMethods(b *testing.B) {
 		b.ReportAllocs()
 		b.ResetTimer()
 		for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
-			resultString = builderString(meta, pubip)
+			resultString = builderString(meta)
 		}
 	})
 
@@ -183,7 +181,7 @@ func BenchmarkHashingMethods(b *testing.B) {
 		b.ReportAllocs()
 		b.ResetTimer()
 		for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
-			resultString = fnvHashToString(meta, pubip)
+			resultString = fnvHashToString(meta)
 		}
 	})
 
@@ -191,7 +189,7 @@ func BenchmarkHashingMethods(b *testing.B) {
 		b.ReportAllocs()
 		b.ResetTimer()
 		for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
-			resultUint = metaHash(meta, pubip)
+			resultUint = metaHash(meta)
 		}
 	})
 
@@ -199,29 +197,20 @@ func BenchmarkHashingMethods(b *testing.B) {
 	_ = resultUint
 }
 
-func fnvHashToString(meta nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta, pubip string) string {
+func fnvHashToString(meta nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta) string {
 	h := fnv.New64a()
 
-	if len(meta.NetworkAddresses) != 0 {
-		for _, na := range meta.NetworkAddresses {
-			h.Write([]byte(na.Mac))
-		}
-	}
-
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.WtVersion))
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.OSVersion))
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.KernelVersion))
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.Hostname))
 	h.Write([]byte(meta.SystemSerialNumber))
-	h.Write([]byte(pubip))
 
 	return strconv.FormatUint(h.Sum64(), 16)
 }
 
-func builderString(meta nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta, pubip string) string {
-	mac := getMacAddress(meta.NetworkAddresses)
-	estimatedSize := len(meta.WtVersion) + len(meta.OSVersion) + len(meta.KernelVersion) + len(meta.Hostname) + len(meta.SystemSerialNumber) +
-		len(pubip) + len(mac) + 6
+func builderString(meta nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta) string {
+	estimatedSize := len(meta.WtVersion) + len(meta.OSVersion) + len(meta.KernelVersion) + len(meta.Hostname) + len(meta.SystemSerialNumber) + 4
 
 	var b strings.Builder
 	b.Grow(estimatedSize)
@@ -235,23 +224,10 @@ func builderString(meta nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta, pubip string) string {
 	b.WriteString(meta.Hostname)
 	b.WriteByte('|')
 	b.WriteString(meta.SystemSerialNumber)
-	b.WriteByte('|')
-	b.WriteString(pubip)
 
 	return b.String()
 }
 
-func getMacAddress(nas []nbpeer.NetworkAddress) string {
-	if len(nas) == 0 {
-		return ""
-	}
-	macs := make([]string, 0, len(nas))
-	for _, na := range nas {
-		macs = append(macs, na.Mac)
-	}
-	return strings.Join(macs, "/")
-}
-
 func BenchmarkLoginFilter_ParallelLoad(b *testing.B) {
 	filter := newLoginFilterWithCfg(testAdvancedCfg())
 	numKeys := 100000

management/internals/shared/grpc/server.go

@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ func (s *Server) Sync(req *proto.EncryptedMessage, srv proto.ManagementService_S
 		return mapError(ctx, err)
 	}
 
-	metahashed := metaHash(peerMeta, sRealIP)
+	metahashed := metaHash(peerMeta)
 	if userID == "" && !s.loginFilter.allowLogin(peerKey.String(), metahashed) {
 		if s.appMetrics != nil {
 			s.appMetrics.GRPCMetrics().CountSyncRequestBlocked()
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ func (s *Server) Sync(req *proto.EncryptedMessage, srv proto.ManagementService_S
 		log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("peer system meta has to be provided on sync. Peer %s, remote addr %s", peerKey.String(), realIP)
 	}
 
-	metahash := metaHash(peerMeta, realIP.String())
+	metahash := metaHash(peerMeta)
 	s.loginFilter.addLogin(peerKey.String(), metahash)
 
 	peer, netMap, postureChecks, dnsFwdPort, err := s.accountManager.SyncAndMarkPeer(ctx, accountID, peerKey.String(), peerMeta, realIP, syncStart)
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ func (s *Server) Login(ctx context.Context, req *proto.EncryptedMessage) (*proto
 	}
 
 	peerMeta := extractPeerMeta(ctx, loginReq.GetMeta())
-	metahashed := metaHash(peerMeta, sRealIP)
+	metahashed := metaHash(peerMeta)
 	if !s.loginFilter.allowLogin(peerKey.String(), metahashed) {
 		if s.logBlockedPeers {
 			log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("peer %s with meta hash %d is blocked from login", peerKey.String(), metahashed)
@@ -788,7 +788,11 @@ func (s *Server) Login(ctx context.Context, req *proto.EncryptedMessage) (*proto
 		ExtraDNSLabels:  loginReq.GetDnsLabels(),
 	})
 	if err != nil {
-		log.WithContext(ctx).Warnf("failed logging in peer %s: %s", peerKey, err)
+		if errors.Is(err, internalStatus.ErrNoAuthMethodProvided) {
+			log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("failed logging in peer %s: %s", peerKey, err)
+		} else {
+			log.WithContext(ctx).Warnf("failed logging in peer %s: %s", peerKey, err)
+		}
 		return nil, mapError(ctx, err)
 	}
 

management/server/affected_peers_coverage_test.go

@@ -107,7 +107,9 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_DependencyCoverageMatrix(t *testing.T) {
 			affected := resolveAffected(t, s.manager.Store, s.accountID, change)
 
 			assert.ElementsMatch(t, affected, mustContain, "expected peer to be affected")
-			assert.NotContains(t, affected, mustExclude, "peer must not be affected")
+			for _, peerID := range mustExclude {
+				assert.NotContains(t, affected, peerID, "peer must not be affected")
+			}
 		})
 	}
 }

management/server/affected_peers_router_paths_test.go

@@ -251,7 +251,9 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_E2E_UpdateResource_DestinationResourcePolicy_RefreshesSou
 	}
 }
 
-func TestAffectedPeers_E2E_UpdateResource_DisabledSiblingRouter_StillBridged(t *testing.T) {
+// A disabled sibling router routes to nobody, so updating a resource on its network
+// must NOT refresh its peer (the enabled router carries the bridge instead).
+func TestAffectedPeers_E2E_UpdateResource_DisabledSiblingRouterNotBridged(t *testing.T) {
 	s := setupRouterScenario(t, true)
 	ctx := context.Background()
 
@@ -274,13 +276,18 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_E2E_UpdateResource_DisabledSiblingRouter_StillBridged(t *
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
 	disabledCh := s.updateManager.CreateChannel(ctx, disabledRouterPeer.ID)
-	t.Cleanup(func() { s.updateManager.CloseChannel(ctx, disabledRouterPeer.ID) })
+	enabledCh := s.updateManager.CreateChannel(ctx, s.routerPeerID)
+	t.Cleanup(func() {
+		s.updateManager.CloseChannel(ctx, disabledRouterPeer.ID)
+		s.updateManager.CloseChannel(ctx, s.routerPeerID)
+	})
 
-	settleAffectedUpdates(disabledCh)
+	settleAffectedUpdates(disabledCh, enabledCh)
 
 	done := make(chan struct{})
 	go func() {
-		peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, disabledCh)
+		peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, enabledCh)
+		peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, disabledCh)
 		close(done)
 	}()
 
@@ -298,7 +305,7 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_E2E_UpdateResource_DisabledSiblingRouter_StillBridged(t *
 	select {
 	case <-done:
 	case <-time.After(peerUpdateTimeout):
-		t.Error("timeout: resource update did not refresh the disabled sibling router's peer")
+		t.Error("timeout")
 	}
 }
 

management/server/affected_peers_router_test.go

@@ -682,6 +682,9 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_AllRoutingPeers_Network(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.Contains(t, affected, secondRouterPeer.ID, "second routing peer on the same network must also be affected")
 }
 
+// A disabled router in the snapshot routes to nobody, so it is skipped when the
+// walk scans existing account data: a policy edit still folds the literal source
+// group, but not the disabled router's peer.
 func TestAffectedPeers_DisabledRouter(t *testing.T) {
 	s := setupRouterScenario(t, true)
 	ctx := context.Background()
@@ -694,11 +697,13 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_DisabledRouter(t *testing.T) {
 
 	affected := s.resolvePolicyAffected(ctx, peerToResourcePolicyByGroup(s.sourceGroupID, s.resourceGroupID))
 
-	assert.Contains(t, affected, s.sourcePeerID, "source peer must be affected")
-	assert.Contains(t, affected, s.routerPeerID,
-		"disabled router's peer must still be affected: Enabled must not gate affected-peers")
+	assert.Contains(t, affected, s.sourcePeerID, "source peer (literal policy source group) must be affected")
+	assert.NotContains(t, affected, s.routerPeerID,
+		"a disabled router routes to nobody, so its peer must not be folded from snapshot data")
 }
 
+// A disabled resource in the snapshot is skipped: the policy edit still folds the
+// literal source group, but the resource no longer bridges to its network's router.
 func TestAffectedPeers_DisabledResource(t *testing.T) {
 	s := setupRouterScenario(t, true)
 	ctx := context.Background()
@@ -710,9 +715,9 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_DisabledResource(t *testing.T) {
 
 	affected := s.resolvePolicyAffected(ctx, peerToResourcePolicyByGroup(s.sourceGroupID, s.resourceGroupID))
 
-	assert.Contains(t, affected, s.sourcePeerID, "source peer must be affected")
-	assert.Contains(t, affected, s.routerPeerID,
-		"disabled resource must still resolve the routing peer: Enabled must not gate affected-peers")
+	assert.Contains(t, affected, s.sourcePeerID, "source peer (literal policy source group) must be affected")
+	assert.NotContains(t, affected, s.routerPeerID,
+		"a disabled resource routes to nobody, so its network's router must not be folded from snapshot data")
 }
 
 func TestAffectedPeers_DisabledRule(t *testing.T) {

management/server/affected_peers_test.go

@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ func TestCollectGroupChange_NetworkRouterLinked(t *testing.T) {
 		AccountID:  accountID,
 		PeerGroups: []string{groupIDs[0]},
 		Peer:       peerIDs[3],
+		Enabled:    true,
 	})
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
@@ -368,6 +369,7 @@ func TestCollectGroupChange_NetworkRouterPeerOnlyNoGroups(t *testing.T) {
 		NetworkID: net1.ID,
 		AccountID: accountID,
 		Peer:      peerIDs[4],
+		Enabled:   true,
 	})
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
@@ -490,8 +492,9 @@ func TestResolveAffectedPeers_PolicyBetweenTwoGroups(t *testing.T) {
 	result = manager.resolveAffectedPeersForPeerChanges(ctx, s, accountID, []string{peerIDs[1]})
 	assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{peerIDs[0], peerIDs[1]}, result)
 
+	// peerIDs[2] is unrelated to the route; only its own map can change.
 	result = manager.resolveAffectedPeersForPeerChanges(ctx, s, accountID, []string{peerIDs[2]})
-	assert.Empty(t, result)
+	assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{peerIDs[2]}, result)
 }
 
 func TestResolveAffectedPeers_PolicyThreeGroups(t *testing.T) {
@@ -544,8 +547,9 @@ func TestResolveAffectedPeers_RoutePeerGroups(t *testing.T) {
 	result = manager.resolveAffectedPeersForPeerChanges(ctx, s, accountID, []string{peerIDs[1]})
 	assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{peerIDs[0], peerIDs[1]}, result)
 
+	// peerIDs[2] is in no policy; only its own map can change, so it refreshes itself.
 	result = manager.resolveAffectedPeersForPeerChanges(ctx, s, accountID, []string{peerIDs[2]})
-	assert.Empty(t, result)
+	assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{peerIDs[2]}, result)
 }
 
 func TestResolveAffectedPeers_RouteWithDirectPeer(t *testing.T) {
@@ -602,9 +606,9 @@ func TestResolveAffectedPeers_RouteWithAccessControlGroups(t *testing.T) {
 	result := manager.resolveAffectedPeersForPeerChanges(ctx, s, accountID, []string{peerIDs[2]})
 	assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{peerIDs[0], peerIDs[1], peerIDs[2]}, result)
 
-	// peer3 is unrelated
+	// peer3 is unrelated to the route; only its own map can change.
 	result = manager.resolveAffectedPeersForPeerChanges(ctx, s, accountID, []string{peerIDs[3]})
-	assert.Empty(t, result)
+	assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{peerIDs[3]}, result)
 }
 
 func TestResolveAffectedPeers_NetworkRouter(t *testing.T) {
@@ -625,6 +629,7 @@ func TestResolveAffectedPeers_NetworkRouter(t *testing.T) {
 		AccountID:  accountID,
 		PeerGroups: []string{groupIDs[0]},
 		Peer:       peerIDs[3],
+		Enabled:    true,
 	})
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
@@ -896,8 +901,9 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_IsolatedPolicies(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NotContains(t, result, peerIDs[0])
 	assert.NotContains(t, result, peerIDs[1])
 
+	// peerIDs[4] is in neither isolated policy; only its own map can change.
 	result = manager.resolveAffectedPeersForPeerChanges(ctx, s, accountID, []string{peerIDs[4]})
-	assert.Empty(t, result)
+	assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{peerIDs[4]}, result)
 }
 
 func TestAffectedPeers_IsolatedRouteAndPolicy(t *testing.T) {
@@ -1019,12 +1025,13 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_GroupUpdateOnlyAffectsLinkedPeers(t *testing.T) {
 	})
 }
 
-func TestAffectedPeers_UnlinkedGroupChange_NoUpdates(t *testing.T) {
+// A peer in no policy/route refreshes only itself — no other peer is affected.
+func TestAffectedPeers_UnlinkedPeerChange_RefreshesSelfOnly(t *testing.T) {
 	manager, s, accountID, peerIDs, _ := setupAffectedPeersTest(t)
 	ctx := context.Background()
 
 	result := manager.resolveAffectedPeersForPeerChanges(ctx, s, accountID, []string{peerIDs[0]})
-	assert.Empty(t, result)
+	assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{peerIDs[0]}, result)
 }
 
 // TestAffectedPeers_PolicyChange_UnrelatedPeerNoUpdate verifies that creating/deleting a
@@ -1374,6 +1381,7 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_NetworkRouterUnlinkedPeerNoUpdate(t *testing.T) {
 		NetworkID:  net1.ID,
 		AccountID:  accountID,
 		PeerGroups: []string{"nr-grpA"},
+		Enabled:    true,
 	})
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 
@@ -1797,7 +1805,9 @@ func TestCollectAffectedFromProxyServices_GroupContainingTargetPeerChanged(t *te
 	assert.Contains(t, directPeers, peerIDs[1], "target peer must be refreshed")
 }
 
-func TestCollectAffectedFromProxyServices_DisabledServiceStillMatches(t *testing.T) {
+// A disabled service in the snapshot proxies nothing, so it is skipped: a changed
+// target peer does not pull in the service's proxy peer.
+func TestCollectAffectedFromProxyServices_DisabledServiceSkipped(t *testing.T) {
 	manager, s, accountID, peerIDs, _ := setupAffectedPeersTest(t)
 	ctx := context.Background()
 
@@ -1823,8 +1833,7 @@ func TestCollectAffectedFromProxyServices_DisabledServiceStillMatches(t *testing
 	require.NoError(t, s.CreateService(ctx, svc))
 
 	_, directPeers := collectPeerChangeAffectedGroups(ctx, manager.Store, accountID, nil, []string{peerIDs[1]})
-	assert.Contains(t, directPeers, peerIDs[0], "disabled service should still trigger a refresh so peers are ready when re-enabled")
-	assert.Contains(t, directPeers, peerIDs[1], "disabled target should still trigger a refresh")
+	assert.NotContains(t, directPeers, peerIDs[0], "a disabled service proxies nothing, so its proxy peer must not be folded")
 }
 
 func TestCollectAffectedFromProxyServices_NonPeerTargetType(t *testing.T) {

management/server/affectedpeers/resolver_test.go

@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ import (
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/types"
 )
 
-// policyGroupsAndPeers mirrors the explicit-policy extraction (RuleGroups +
-// direct peers) the resolver folds in, for asserting the pure logic.
+// policyGroupsAndPeers mirrors the both-sides extraction (RuleGroups + direct peers)
+// the resolver folds in for a changed policy, for asserting the pure logic.
 func policyGroupsAndPeers(policies ...*types.Policy) (groups []string, peers []string) {
 	peerSet := map[string]struct{}{}
 	for _, p := range policies {
@@ -19,7 +19,14 @@ func policyGroupsAndPeers(policies ...*types.Policy) (groups []string, peers []s
 			continue
 		}
 		groups = append(groups, p.RuleGroups()...)
-		collectPolicyDirectPeers(p, peerSet)
+		for _, rule := range p.Rules {
+			if rule.SourceResource.Type == types.ResourceTypePeer && rule.SourceResource.ID != "" {
+				peerSet[rule.SourceResource.ID] = struct{}{}
+			}
+			if rule.DestinationResource.Type == types.ResourceTypePeer && rule.DestinationResource.ID != "" {
+				peerSet[rule.DestinationResource.ID] = struct{}{}
+			}
+		}
 	}
 	for id := range peerSet {
 		peers = append(peers, id)
@@ -87,24 +94,9 @@ func TestPolicyReferencesPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.False(t, policyReferencesPostureChecks(policy, map[string]struct{}{"pc3": {}}))
 }
 
-func TestCollectPolicyDirectPeers(t *testing.T) {
-	policy := &types.Policy{Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{{
-		SourceResource:      types.Resource{Type: types.ResourceTypePeer, ID: "p1"},
-		DestinationResource: types.Resource{Type: types.ResourceTypePeer, ID: "p2"},
-	}, {
-		DestinationResource: types.Resource{Type: types.ResourceTypeHost, ID: "r1"},
-	}}}
-
-	peerSet := map[string]struct{}{}
-	collectPolicyDirectPeers(policy, peerSet)
-
-	assert.Contains(t, peerSet, "p1")
-	assert.Contains(t, peerSet, "p2")
-	assert.NotContains(t, peerSet, "r1")
-}
-
 func TestCollectPolicySources(t *testing.T) {
 	policy := &types.Policy{Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{{
+		Enabled:        true,
 		Sources:        []string{"g1"},
 		SourceResource: types.Resource{Type: types.ResourceTypePeer, ID: "p1"},
 		Destinations:   []string{"g2"},

management/server/group.go

@@ -520,7 +520,12 @@ func collectDeletableGroups(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accoun
 // GroupAddPeer appends peer to the group
 func (am *DefaultAccountManager) GroupAddPeer(ctx context.Context, accountID, groupID, peerID string) error {
 	var snap *affectedpeers.Snapshot
-	change := affectedpeers.Change{ChangedGroupIDs: []string{groupID}}
+	// A membership change affects only the peer itself and the opposite side of THIS
+	// group's policies — not the group's other members, and not the peer's other
+	// groups. LinkGroups walks only this group (matched, not expanded); OutputPeerIDs
+	// refreshes the peer without seeding its other group memberships. For an
+	// intra-group policy the opposite side is the group, so its members still refresh.
+	change := affectedpeers.Change{OutputPeerIDs: []string{peerID}, LinkGroups: []string{groupID}}
 
 	err := am.Store.ExecuteInTransaction(ctx, func(transaction store.Store) error {
 		if err := transaction.AddPeerToGroup(ctx, accountID, peerID, groupID); err != nil {
@@ -586,10 +591,11 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) GroupAddResource(ctx context.Context, accountID
 // GroupDeletePeer removes peer from the group
 func (am *DefaultAccountManager) GroupDeletePeer(ctx context.Context, accountID, groupID, peerID string) error {
 	var snap *affectedpeers.Snapshot
-	change := affectedpeers.Change{
-		ChangedGroupIDs:     []string{groupID},
-		RemovedPeersByGroup: map[string][]string{groupID: {peerID}},
-	}
+	// Same as GroupAddPeer: the removed peer and the opposite side of THIS group's
+	// policies refresh, not the group's other members or the peer's other groups. The
+	// peer is no longer in the group's index, but LinkGroups still drives the
+	// opposite-side walk, and OutputPeerIDs refreshes the removed peer itself.
+	change := affectedpeers.Change{OutputPeerIDs: []string{peerID}, LinkGroups: []string{groupID}}
 
 	err := am.Store.ExecuteInTransaction(ctx, func(transaction store.Store) error {
 		if err := transaction.RemovePeerFromGroup(ctx, peerID, groupID); err != nil {
@@ -600,8 +606,6 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) GroupDeletePeer(ctx context.Context, accountID,
 			return err
 		}
 
-		// The removed peer is carried in change.RemovedPeersByGroup and folded in
-		// only when the group is linked, so loading post-removal is correct.
 		var err error
 		if snap, err = affectedpeers.Load(ctx, transaction, accountID, change); err != nil {
 			return err

management/server/http/handlers/users/users_handler.go

@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ func (h *handler) getAllUsers(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
 		}
 
 		includeServiceUser, err := strconv.ParseBool(serviceUser)
-		log.WithContext(r.Context()).Debugf("Should include service user: %v", includeServiceUser)
+		log.WithContext(r.Context()).Tracef("Should include service user: %v", includeServiceUser)
 		if err != nil {
 			util.WriteError(r.Context(), status.Errorf(status.InvalidArgument, "invalid service_user query parameter"), w)
 			return

management/server/peer.go

@@ -209,14 +209,14 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) resolvePeerLocation(ctx context.Context, peer *
 	if am.geo == nil || realIP == nil {
 		return nil
 	}
-	if peer.Location.ConnectionIP != nil && peer.Location.ConnectionIP.Equal(realIP) {
-		return nil
-	}
 	location, err := am.geo.Lookup(realIP)
 	if err != nil {
 		log.WithContext(ctx).Warnf("failed to get location for peer %s realip: [%s]: %v", peer.ID, realIP.String(), err)
 		return nil
 	}
+	if peer.Location.ConnectionIP != nil && peer.Location.ConnectionIP.Equal(realIP) && peer.Location.GeoNameID == location.City.GeonameID {
+		return nil
+	}
 	return &nbpeer.Location{
 		ConnectionIP: realIP,
 		CountryCode:  location.Country.ISOCode,
@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) handleSetupKeyAddedPeer(ctx context.Context, en
 func (am *DefaultAccountManager) AddPeer(ctx context.Context, accountID, setupKey, userID string, peer *nbpeer.Peer, temporary bool) (*nbpeer.Peer, *types.Network, []*posture.Checks, bool, error) {
 	if setupKey == "" && userID == "" && !peer.ProxyMeta.Embedded {
 		// no auth method provided => reject access
-		return nil, nil, nil, false, status.Errorf(status.Unauthenticated, "no peer auth method provided, please use a setup key or interactive SSO login")
+		return nil, nil, nil, false, status.ErrNoAuthMethodProvided
 	}
 
 	upperKey := strings.ToUpper(setupKey)
@@ -1051,8 +1051,8 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) SyncPeer(ctx context.Context, sync types.PeerSy
 		return nil, nil, nil, 0, err
 	}
 
-	metaDiffAffectsPosture := posture.AffectsPosture(&metaDiff, resPostureChecks)
-	if isStatusChanged || sync.UpdateAccountPeers || ipv6CapabilityChanged || metaDiffAffectsPosture || metaDiff.VersionChanged || metaDiff.Hostname {
+	metaDiffAffectsPosture := posture.AffectsPosture(ctx, &metaDiff, resPostureChecks)
+	if requiresPeerUpdate(ctx, isStatusChanged, sync.UpdateAccountPeers, ipv6CapabilityChanged, metaDiffAffectsPosture, metaDiff.VersionChanged(), metaDiff.HostnameChanged()) {
 		changedPeerIDs := []string{peer.ID}
 		affectedPeerIDs := am.syncPeerAffectedPeers(ctx, accountID, peer.ID, nmap, peerNotValid, metaDiffAffectsPosture)
 		if err = am.networkMapController.OnPeersUpdated(ctx, accountID, changedPeerIDs, affectedPeerIDs); err != nil {
@@ -1063,6 +1063,29 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) SyncPeer(ctx context.Context, sync types.PeerSy
 	return peer, nmap, resPostureChecks, dnsFwdPort, nil
 }
 
+func requiresPeerUpdate(ctx context.Context, isStatusChanged, updateAccountPeers, ipv6CapabilityChanged, metaDiffAffectsPosture, versionChanged, hostname bool) bool {
+	var reason string
+	switch {
+	case isStatusChanged:
+		reason = "status changed"
+	case updateAccountPeers:
+		reason = "update account peers"
+	case ipv6CapabilityChanged:
+		reason = "ipv6 capability changed"
+	case metaDiffAffectsPosture:
+		reason = "meta diff affects posture"
+	case versionChanged:
+		reason = "version changed"
+	case hostname:
+		reason = "hostname changed"
+	default:
+		return false
+	}
+
+	log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("peer update required: %s", reason)
+	return true
+}
+
 // syncPeerAffectedPeers resolves the peers affected by a SyncPeer change. The
 // peer's own validated network map is bidirectional for policy and routing
 // reachability, so when the peer stays valid and no source-posture gate is in

management/server/peer/peer.go

@@ -107,6 +107,15 @@ type Location struct {
 	GeoNameID    uint // city level geoname id
 }
 
+// equal reports whether two locations match. ConnectionIP is a net.IP slice, so it uses
+// IP.Equal, not ==.
+func (l Location) equal(other Location) bool {
+	return l.CountryCode == other.CountryCode &&
+		l.CityName == other.CityName &&
+		l.GeoNameID == other.GeoNameID &&
+		l.ConnectionIP.Equal(other.ConnectionIP)
+}
+
 // NetworkAddress is the IP address with network and MAC address of a network interface
 type NetworkAddress struct {
 	NetIP netip.Prefix `gorm:"serializer:json"`
@@ -267,185 +276,141 @@ func (p *Peer) UpdateMetaIfNew(ctx context.Context, meta PeerSystemMeta, newLoca
 		return MetaDiff{}
 	}
 
-	versionChanged := p.Meta.WtVersion != meta.WtVersion
-
 	// Avoid overwriting UIVersion if the update was triggered sole by the CLI client
 	if meta.UIVersion == "" {
 		meta.UIVersion = p.Meta.UIVersion
 	}
 
-	oldVersion := p.Meta.WtVersion
+	effectiveLocation := p.Location
+	if newLocation != nil {
+		effectiveLocation = *newLocation
+	}
 
-	diff := diffMeta(p.Meta, meta)
-	if diff.Any() {
+	diff := diffMeta(p.Meta, meta, p.Location, effectiveLocation)
+	if diff.Updated() {
 		p.Meta = meta
 	}
-	diff.VersionChanged = versionChanged
+	p.Location = effectiveLocation
 
-	locationInfo := ""
-	if newLocation != nil {
-		p.Location = *newLocation
-		diff.LocationChanged = true
-		locationInfo = fmt.Sprintf("location changed to %s, ", newLocation.ConnectionIP)
-	}
-
-	versionInfo := ""
-	if diff.VersionChanged {
-		versionInfo = fmt.Sprintf("version changed: %s -> %s, ", oldVersion, meta.WtVersion)
-	}
-
-	if diff.Any() || diff.VersionChanged || diff.LocationChanged {
-		log.WithContext(ctx).
-			Debugf("peer meta updated, %s%s%d field(s) changed: %s", versionInfo, locationInfo, len(diff.Changed), strings.Join(diff.Changed, ", "))
+	if diff.Updated() {
+		log.WithContext(ctx).Debug(diff.LogSummary())
 	}
 
 	return diff
 }
 
-// MetaDiff records which PeerSystemMeta fields differ between two metas. Each bool
-// maps to a single struct field, except Environment, which is split into Cloud and
-// Platform. Changed holds the human-readable `field: <old> -> <new>` entries so the
-// existing log line and isEqual can be derived from the same comparison.
-//
-// VersionChanged and LocationChanged sit outside the per-meta-field set:
-// VersionChanged tracks the WireGuard client version specifically (compared before
-// the UIVersion fixup, to signal client upgrades) and LocationChanged tracks the
-// peer's connection geo location, which lives on Peer rather than PeerSystemMeta.
-// Neither contributes an entry to Changed, so the field-coverage accounting stays
-// driven purely by the PeerSystemMeta comparison.
+// MetaDiff holds a peer's full before/after state across a sync: both metas and both
+// connection locations (the location lives on Peer, not PeerSystemMeta, but posture
+// checks read it). Changed lists what moved, for logging and the persistence decision;
+// the snapshots let a posture check be replayed against old and new. Everything is derived
+// from these fields, so there are no parallel per-field flags to keep in sync.
 type MetaDiff struct {
-	Hostname            bool
-	GoOS                bool
-	Kernel              bool
-	KernelVersion       bool
-	Core                bool
-	Platform            bool
-	OS                  bool
-	OSVersion           bool
-	WtVersion           bool
-	UIVersion           bool
-	SystemSerialNumber  bool
-	SystemProductName   bool
-	SystemManufacturer  bool
-	EnvironmentCloud    bool
-	EnvironmentPlatform bool
-	Flags               bool
-	Capabilities        bool
-	NetworkAddresses    bool
-	Files               bool
-
-	VersionChanged  bool
-	LocationChanged bool
+	OldMeta     PeerSystemMeta
+	NewMeta     PeerSystemMeta
+	OldLocation Location
+	NewLocation Location
 
 	Changed []string
 }
 
-// Any reports whether any PeerSystemMeta field changed.
-func (d MetaDiff) Any() bool {
+// Updated reports whether anything changed and the peer must be persisted. diffMeta fills
+// Changed in the pass that builds the diff, so this is a length check, not a re-comparison.
+// Pointer receiver: MetaDiff embeds two metas, so copying it per call is wasteful.
+func (d *MetaDiff) Updated() bool {
 	return len(d.Changed) != 0
 }
 
-// Updated reports whether the peer needs to be persisted: any meta field changed
-// or the geo location changed. The version flag alone does not imply a write,
-// since a version change is also reflected in the WtVersion meta field.
-func (d MetaDiff) Updated() bool {
-	return d.Any() || d.LocationChanged || d.VersionChanged
+// VersionChanged reports whether the WireGuard client version changed (a client upgrade).
+func (d *MetaDiff) VersionChanged() bool {
+	return d.OldMeta.WtVersion != d.NewMeta.WtVersion
+}
+
+// HostnameChanged reports whether the peer's hostname changed.
+func (d *MetaDiff) HostnameChanged() bool {
+	return d.OldMeta.Hostname != d.NewMeta.Hostname
+}
+
+// LogSummary renders the changed fields as a single human-readable line.
+func (d *MetaDiff) LogSummary() string {
+	return fmt.Sprintf("peer meta updated, %d field(s) changed: %s",
+		len(d.Changed), strings.Join(d.Changed, ", "))
 }
 
 func metaDiff(oldMeta, newMeta PeerSystemMeta) []string {
-	return diffMeta(oldMeta, newMeta).Changed
+	return diffMeta(oldMeta, newMeta, Location{}, Location{}).Changed
 }
 
-// diffMeta compares two metas field by field, returning both a per-field flag set
-// (for callers that need to know exactly what changed, e.g. matching against
-// posture checks) and the human-readable Changed list. It is the single source of
-// truth for meta comparison: isEqual reports equality as an empty diff, so the log
-// line, the change decision, and the flags can never disagree.
-func diffMeta(oldMeta, newMeta PeerSystemMeta) MetaDiff {
-	var d MetaDiff
+// diffMeta snapshots a peer's old and new state and records a Changed entry per field that
+// moved. It is the single source of truth for the comparison: isEqual is an empty Changed
+// list, so the log line and the persistence decision can never disagree.
+func diffMeta(oldMeta, newMeta PeerSystemMeta, oldLocation, newLocation Location) MetaDiff {
+	d := MetaDiff{OldMeta: oldMeta, NewMeta: newMeta, OldLocation: oldLocation, NewLocation: newLocation}
 	add := func(field string, oldVal, newVal any) {
 		d.Changed = append(d.Changed, fmt.Sprintf("%s: %v -> %v", field, oldVal, newVal))
 	}
 
 	if oldMeta.Hostname != newMeta.Hostname {
-		d.Hostname = true
 		add("hostname", oldMeta.Hostname, newMeta.Hostname)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.GoOS != newMeta.GoOS {
-		d.GoOS = true
 		add("goos", oldMeta.GoOS, newMeta.GoOS)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.Kernel != newMeta.Kernel {
-		d.Kernel = true
 		add("kernel", oldMeta.Kernel, newMeta.Kernel)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.KernelVersion != newMeta.KernelVersion {
-		d.KernelVersion = true
 		add("kernel_version", oldMeta.KernelVersion, newMeta.KernelVersion)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.Core != newMeta.Core {
-		d.Core = true
 		add("core", oldMeta.Core, newMeta.Core)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.Platform != newMeta.Platform {
-		d.Platform = true
 		add("platform", oldMeta.Platform, newMeta.Platform)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.OS != newMeta.OS {
-		d.OS = true
 		add("os", oldMeta.OS, newMeta.OS)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.OSVersion != newMeta.OSVersion {
-		d.OSVersion = true
 		add("os_version", oldMeta.OSVersion, newMeta.OSVersion)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.WtVersion != newMeta.WtVersion {
-		d.WtVersion = true
 		add("wt_version", oldMeta.WtVersion, newMeta.WtVersion)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.UIVersion != newMeta.UIVersion {
-		d.UIVersion = true
 		add("ui_version", oldMeta.UIVersion, newMeta.UIVersion)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.SystemSerialNumber != newMeta.SystemSerialNumber {
-		d.SystemSerialNumber = true
 		add("system_serial_number", oldMeta.SystemSerialNumber, newMeta.SystemSerialNumber)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.SystemProductName != newMeta.SystemProductName {
-		d.SystemProductName = true
 		add("system_product_name", oldMeta.SystemProductName, newMeta.SystemProductName)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.SystemManufacturer != newMeta.SystemManufacturer {
-		d.SystemManufacturer = true
 		add("system_manufacturer", oldMeta.SystemManufacturer, newMeta.SystemManufacturer)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.Environment.Cloud != newMeta.Environment.Cloud {
-		d.EnvironmentCloud = true
 		add("environment_cloud", oldMeta.Environment.Cloud, newMeta.Environment.Cloud)
 	}
 	if oldMeta.Environment.Platform != newMeta.Environment.Platform {
-		d.EnvironmentPlatform = true
 		add("environment_platform", oldMeta.Environment.Platform, newMeta.Environment.Platform)
 	}
 	if !oldMeta.Flags.isEqual(newMeta.Flags) {
-		d.Flags = true
 		add("flags", fmt.Sprintf("%+v", oldMeta.Flags), fmt.Sprintf("%+v", newMeta.Flags))
 	}
 	if !capabilitiesEqual(oldMeta.Capabilities, newMeta.Capabilities) {
-		d.Capabilities = true
 		add("capabilities", oldMeta.Capabilities, newMeta.Capabilities)
 	}
-
 	if !sameMultiset(oldMeta.NetworkAddresses, newMeta.NetworkAddresses) {
-		d.NetworkAddresses = true
 		add("network_addresses", fmt.Sprintf("%v", oldMeta.NetworkAddresses), fmt.Sprintf("%v", newMeta.NetworkAddresses))
 	}
-
 	if !sameMultiset(oldMeta.Files, newMeta.Files) {
-		d.Files = true
 		add("files", fmt.Sprintf("%v", oldMeta.Files), fmt.Sprintf("%v", newMeta.Files))
 	}
 
+	if !oldLocation.equal(newLocation) {
+		add("connection_ip", oldLocation.ConnectionIP, newLocation.ConnectionIP)
+	}
+
 	return d
 }
 

management/server/peer_test.go

@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ import (
 
 	nbdns "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/dns"
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/activity"
+	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/geolocation"
 	nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/posture"
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/store"
@@ -2893,3 +2894,141 @@ func TestUpdatePeer_DnsLabelUniqueName(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err, "renaming to unique FQDN should succeed")
 	assert.Equal(t, "api-server", updated.DNSLabel, "DNS label should be first label of FQDN")
 }
+
+// fakeGeo is a configurable geolocation.Geolocation implementation for tests. It
+// returns a record built from the configured city geoname id, or an error when set.
+type fakeGeo struct {
+	geoNameID uint
+	isoCode   string
+	cityName  string
+	err       error
+}
+
+func (g *fakeGeo) Lookup(net.IP) (*geolocation.Record, error) {
+	if g.err != nil {
+		return nil, g.err
+	}
+	record := &geolocation.Record{}
+	record.City.GeonameID = g.geoNameID
+	record.City.Names.En = g.cityName
+	record.Country.ISOCode = g.isoCode
+	return record, nil
+}
+
+func (g *fakeGeo) GetAllCountries() ([]geolocation.Country, error) { return nil, nil }
+
+func (g *fakeGeo) GetCitiesByCountry(string) ([]geolocation.City, error) { return nil, nil }
+
+func (g *fakeGeo) Stop() error { return nil }
+
+func TestResolvePeerLocation(t *testing.T) {
+	realIP := net.ParseIP("203.0.113.10")
+
+	tests := []struct {
+		name    string
+		geo     geolocation.Geolocation
+		peer    *nbpeer.Peer
+		realIP  net.IP
+		want    *nbpeer.Location
+		wantNil bool
+	}{
+		{
+			name:    "no geo configured returns nil",
+			geo:     nil,
+			peer:    &nbpeer.Peer{ID: "p1"},
+			realIP:  realIP,
+			wantNil: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "nil real IP returns nil",
+			geo:     &fakeGeo{geoNameID: 100},
+			peer:    &nbpeer.Peer{ID: "p1"},
+			realIP:  nil,
+			wantNil: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "lookup error returns nil",
+			geo:     &fakeGeo{err: fmt.Errorf("lookup boom")},
+			peer:    &nbpeer.Peer{ID: "p1"},
+			realIP:  realIP,
+			wantNil: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "same IP and same geoname returns nil",
+			geo:  &fakeGeo{geoNameID: 100, isoCode: "US", cityName: "City A"},
+			peer: &nbpeer.Peer{
+				ID: "p1",
+				Location: nbpeer.Location{
+					ConnectionIP: realIP,
+					GeoNameID:    100,
+				},
+			},
+			realIP:  realIP,
+			wantNil: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "same IP but changed geoname returns location",
+			geo:  &fakeGeo{geoNameID: 200, isoCode: "US", cityName: "City B"},
+			peer: &nbpeer.Peer{
+				ID: "p1",
+				Location: nbpeer.Location{
+					ConnectionIP: realIP,
+					GeoNameID:    100,
+				},
+			},
+			realIP: realIP,
+			want: &nbpeer.Location{
+				ConnectionIP: realIP,
+				CountryCode:  "US",
+				CityName:     "City B",
+				GeoNameID:    200,
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			name: "different IP returns location",
+			geo:  &fakeGeo{geoNameID: 100, isoCode: "US", cityName: "City A"},
+			peer: &nbpeer.Peer{
+				ID: "p1",
+				Location: nbpeer.Location{
+					ConnectionIP: net.ParseIP("198.51.100.7"),
+					GeoNameID:    100,
+				},
+			},
+			realIP: realIP,
+			want: &nbpeer.Location{
+				ConnectionIP: realIP,
+				CountryCode:  "US",
+				CityName:     "City A",
+				GeoNameID:    100,
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			name:   "no prior location returns location",
+			geo:    &fakeGeo{geoNameID: 100, isoCode: "US", cityName: "City A"},
+			peer:   &nbpeer.Peer{ID: "p1"},
+			realIP: realIP,
+			want: &nbpeer.Location{
+				ConnectionIP: realIP,
+				CountryCode:  "US",
+				CityName:     "City A",
+				GeoNameID:    100,
+			},
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			am := &DefaultAccountManager{geo: tt.geo}
+			got := am.resolvePeerLocation(context.Background(), tt.peer, tt.realIP)
+			if tt.wantNil {
+				assert.Nil(t, got, "resolved location should be nil")
+				return
+			}
+			require.NotNil(t, got, "resolved location should not be nil")
+			assert.True(t, tt.want.ConnectionIP.Equal(got.ConnectionIP), "connection IP should match")
+			assert.Equal(t, tt.want.CountryCode, got.CountryCode, "country code should match")
+			assert.Equal(t, tt.want.CityName, got.CityName, "city name should match")
+			assert.Equal(t, tt.want.GeoNameID, got.GeoNameID, "geoname id should match")
+		})
+	}
+}

management/server/posture/affects_posture_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+package posture
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"net"
+	"net/netip"
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+
+	nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
+)
+
+// diffFrom builds a MetaDiff from the old/new snapshots AffectsPosture replays against.
+func diffFrom(oldMeta, newMeta nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta, oldLoc, newLoc nbpeer.Location) *nbpeer.MetaDiff {
+	return &nbpeer.MetaDiff{
+		OldMeta:     oldMeta,
+		NewMeta:     newMeta,
+		OldLocation: oldLoc,
+		NewLocation: newLoc,
+	}
+}
+
+func checks(def ChecksDefinition) []*Checks {
+	return []*Checks{{Checks: def}}
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_NilDiff(t *testing.T) {
+	assert.False(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), nil, checks(ChecksDefinition{
+		NBVersionCheck: &NBVersionCheck{MinVersion: "1.0.0"},
+	})))
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_NBVersion(t *testing.T) {
+	c := checks(ChecksDefinition{NBVersionCheck: &NBVersionCheck{MinVersion: "1.2.0"}})
+
+	tests := []struct {
+		name           string
+		oldVer, newVer string
+		want           bool
+	}{
+		{"both above min, no flip", "1.3.0", "1.4.0", false},
+		{"both below min, no flip", "1.0.0", "1.1.0", false},
+		{"crosses up below->above", "1.1.0", "1.3.0", true},
+		{"crosses down above->below", "1.3.0", "1.1.0", true},
+		{"unparsable old only -> flip", "garbage", "1.3.0", true},
+		{"unparsable both -> no flip", "garbage", "junk", false},
+	}
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			diff := diffFrom(
+				nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{WtVersion: tt.oldVer},
+				nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{WtVersion: tt.newVer},
+				nbpeer.Location{}, nbpeer.Location{},
+			)
+			assert.Equal(t, tt.want, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), diff, c))
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_OSVersion_KernelBumpWithinMin(t *testing.T) {
+	c := checks(ChecksDefinition{OSVersionCheck: &OSVersionCheck{
+		Linux: &MinKernelVersionCheck{MinKernelVersion: "5.0.0"},
+	}})
+
+	// Kernel moves but stays above the minimum: verdict stays pass -> not affected.
+	withinMin := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "linux", KernelVersion: "5.10.0-arch1"},
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "linux", KernelVersion: "5.15.0-arch2"},
+		nbpeer.Location{}, nbpeer.Location{},
+	)
+	assert.False(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), withinMin, c))
+
+	// Kernel drops below the minimum: verdict flips pass -> fail -> affected.
+	crossesDown := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "linux", KernelVersion: "5.10.0-arch1"},
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "linux", KernelVersion: "4.19.0-arch1"},
+		nbpeer.Location{}, nbpeer.Location{},
+	)
+	assert.True(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), crossesDown, c))
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_OSVersion_GoOSSwitchFlipsVerdict(t *testing.T) {
+	// Only Linux is constrained. An OS outside the switch (freebsd) passes; switching to a
+	// failing linux kernel flips the verdict pass -> fail.
+	c := checks(ChecksDefinition{OSVersionCheck: &OSVersionCheck{
+		Linux: &MinKernelVersionCheck{MinKernelVersion: "6.0.0"},
+	}})
+
+	diff := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "freebsd"},
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "linux", KernelVersion: "4.19.0"},
+		nbpeer.Location{}, nbpeer.Location{},
+	)
+	assert.True(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), diff, c))
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_Process_GoOSSwitchFlipsVerdict(t *testing.T) {
+	// Process runs at a linux path. Switching GoOS to windows (no WindowsPath configured)
+	// flips the verdict.
+	c := checks(ChecksDefinition{ProcessCheck: &ProcessCheck{
+		Processes: []Process{{LinuxPath: "/usr/bin/foo"}},
+	}})
+
+	files := []nbpeer.File{{Path: "/usr/bin/foo", ProcessIsRunning: true}}
+	diff := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "linux", Files: files},
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "windows", Files: files},
+		nbpeer.Location{}, nbpeer.Location{},
+	)
+	assert.True(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), diff, c))
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_Process_UnrelatedFileChange(t *testing.T) {
+	// A tracked process stays running while an unrelated file is added: the verdict does
+	// not move, so posture is not affected.
+	c := checks(ChecksDefinition{ProcessCheck: &ProcessCheck{
+		Processes: []Process{{LinuxPath: "/usr/bin/foo"}},
+	}})
+
+	diff := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "linux", Files: []nbpeer.File{
+			{Path: "/usr/bin/foo", ProcessIsRunning: true},
+		}},
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{GoOS: "linux", Files: []nbpeer.File{
+			{Path: "/usr/bin/foo", ProcessIsRunning: true},
+			{Path: "/usr/bin/bar", ProcessIsRunning: true},
+		}},
+		nbpeer.Location{}, nbpeer.Location{},
+	)
+	assert.False(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), diff, c))
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_GeoLocation(t *testing.T) {
+	c := checks(ChecksDefinition{GeoLocationCheck: &GeoLocationCheck{
+		Action:    CheckActionAllow,
+		Locations: []Location{{CountryCode: "DE"}},
+	}})
+
+	// Moving within allowed countries keeps the verdict; moving out flips it.
+	stayAllowed := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{}, nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{},
+		nbpeer.Location{CountryCode: "DE", CityName: "Berlin"},
+		nbpeer.Location{CountryCode: "DE", CityName: "Munich"},
+	)
+	assert.False(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), stayAllowed, c))
+
+	moveOut := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{}, nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{},
+		nbpeer.Location{CountryCode: "DE"},
+		nbpeer.Location{CountryCode: "FR"},
+	)
+	assert.True(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), moveOut, c))
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_PeerNetworkRange_ConnectionIP(t *testing.T) {
+	// The check reads the connection IP. Moving out of the allowed range flips the verdict;
+	// moving within it does not.
+	_, allowed, _ := net.ParseCIDR("10.0.0.0/8")
+	c := checks(ChecksDefinition{PeerNetworkRangeCheck: &PeerNetworkRangeCheck{
+		Action: CheckActionAllow,
+		Ranges: []netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix(allowed.String())},
+	}})
+
+	movesOutOfRange := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{}, nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{},
+		nbpeer.Location{ConnectionIP: net.ParseIP("10.1.2.3")},
+		nbpeer.Location{ConnectionIP: net.ParseIP("8.8.8.8")},
+	)
+	assert.True(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), movesOutOfRange, c))
+
+	staysInRange := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{}, nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{},
+		nbpeer.Location{ConnectionIP: net.ParseIP("10.1.2.3")},
+		nbpeer.Location{ConnectionIP: net.ParseIP("10.9.9.9")},
+	)
+	assert.False(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), staysInRange, c))
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_IrrelevantFieldChange(t *testing.T) {
+	// Hostname changes but no check reads it: not affected even with checks present.
+	c := checks(ChecksDefinition{
+		NBVersionCheck:   &NBVersionCheck{MinVersion: "1.0.0"},
+		GeoLocationCheck: &GeoLocationCheck{Action: CheckActionAllow, Locations: []Location{{CountryCode: "DE"}}},
+	})
+
+	diff := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{Hostname: "old", WtVersion: "1.5.0"},
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{Hostname: "new", WtVersion: "1.5.0"},
+		nbpeer.Location{CountryCode: "DE"}, nbpeer.Location{CountryCode: "DE"},
+	)
+	assert.False(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), diff, c))
+}
+
+func TestAffectsPosture_NoChecks(t *testing.T) {
+	diff := diffFrom(
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{WtVersion: "1.0.0"},
+		nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{WtVersion: "2.0.0"},
+		nbpeer.Location{}, nbpeer.Location{},
+	)
+	assert.False(t, AffectsPosture(context.Background(), diff, nil))
+}

management/server/posture/checks.go

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import (
 	"regexp"
 
 	"github.com/hashicorp/go-version"
+	log "github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
 
 	nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/shared/management/http/api"
@@ -52,34 +53,46 @@ type Checks struct {
 	Checks ChecksDefinition `gorm:"serializer:json"`
 }
 
-// AffectsPosture reports whether the peer metadata changes described by diff can
-// alter the outcome of any of the given posture checks. It maps each check kind to
-// the metadata fields it inspects, so an unrelated change (e.g. a hostname update)
-// does not force a posture re-evaluation.
-func AffectsPosture(diff *nbpeer.MetaDiff, checks []*Checks) bool {
+// AffectsPosture reports whether the change in diff flips the verdict of any check. It
+// replays each check against the peer's old and new state and compares verdicts, so a
+// change that moves a field but stays the right side of a threshold (e.g. a kernel bump
+// still above the minimum) does not force a re-evaluation. See verdictChanged for how an
+// evaluation error counts.
+func AffectsPosture(ctx context.Context, diff *nbpeer.MetaDiff, checks []*Checks) bool {
 	if diff == nil {
 		return false
 	}
+
+	oldPeer := nbpeer.Peer{Meta: diff.OldMeta, Location: diff.OldLocation}
+	newPeer := nbpeer.Peer{Meta: diff.NewMeta, Location: diff.NewLocation}
+
 	for _, c := range checks {
-		if c.Checks.ProcessCheck != nil && diff.Files {
-			return true
-		}
-		if c.Checks.OSVersionCheck != nil && (diff.OSVersion || diff.OS || diff.KernelVersion) {
-			return true
-		}
-		if c.Checks.NBVersionCheck != nil && diff.WtVersion {
-			return true
-		}
-		if c.Checks.GeoLocationCheck != nil && diff.LocationChanged {
-			return true
-		}
-		if c.Checks.PeerNetworkRangeCheck != nil && diff.NetworkAddresses {
-			return true
+		for _, check := range c.GetChecks() {
+			if verdictChanged(ctx, check, oldPeer, newPeer) {
+				return true
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	return false
 }
 
+// verdictChanged replays check against old and new state and reports whether the verdict
+// differs. Like callers, it treats an evaluation error as deny: two errors are the same
+// verdict (no change), an error on one side only is a flip.
+func verdictChanged(ctx context.Context, check Check, oldPeer, newPeer nbpeer.Peer) bool {
+	oldPass, oldErr := check.Check(ctx, oldPeer)
+	newPass, newErr := check.Check(ctx, newPeer)
+
+	oldVerdict := oldPass && (oldErr == nil)
+	newVerdict := newPass && (newErr == nil)
+	changed := oldVerdict != newVerdict
+
+	log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("posture check %s replay: verdict %t -> %t (changed=%t), errs: %v -> %v",
+		check.Name(), oldVerdict, newVerdict, changed, oldErr, newErr)
+
+	return changed
+}
+
 // ChecksDefinition contains definition of actual check
 type ChecksDefinition struct {
 	NBVersionCheck        *NBVersionCheck        `json:",omitempty"`

management/server/posture_checks_test.go

@@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ func TestArePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(t *testing.T) {
 
 	policy := &types.Policy{
 		AccountID: account.Id,
+		Enabled:   true,
 		Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{
 			{
 				Enabled:      true,

management/server/user.go

@@ -1059,8 +1059,8 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) BuildUserInfosForAccount(ctx context.Context, a
 		if err != nil {
 			return nil, err
 		}
-		log.WithContext(ctx).Debugf("Got %d users from ExternalCache for account %s", len(usersFromIntegration), accountID)
-		log.WithContext(ctx).Debugf("Got %d users from InternalCache for account %s", len(queriedUsers), accountID)
+		log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("Got %d users from ExternalCache for account %s", len(usersFromIntegration), accountID)
+		log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("Got %d users from InternalCache for account %s", len(queriedUsers), accountID)
 		queriedUsers = append(queriedUsers, usersFromIntegration...)
 	}
 

shared/management/status/error.go

@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ type Type int32
 var (
 	ErrExtraSettingsNotFound = errors.New("extra settings not found")
 	ErrPeerAlreadyLoggedIn   = errors.New("peer with the same public key is already logged in")
+
+	// ErrNoAuthMethodProvided is returned when a peer login attempt carries neither a
+	// setup key nor an SSO token. Match it with errors.Is.
+	ErrNoAuthMethodProvided = Errorf(Unauthenticated, "no peer auth method provided, please use a setup key or interactive SSO login")
 )
 
 // Error is an internal error
@@ -66,6 +70,16 @@ func (e *Error) Error() string {
 	return e.Message
 }
 
+// Is reports whether target is an *Error with the same type and message,
+// enabling matching with errors.Is against sentinel errors.
+func (e *Error) Is(target error) bool {
+	var t *Error
+	if !errors.As(target, &t) {
+		return false
+	}
+	return e.ErrorType == t.ErrorType && e.Message == t.Message
+}
+
 // Errorf returns Error(ErrorType, fmt.Sprintf(format, a...)).
 func Errorf(errorType Type, format string, a ...interface{}) error {
 	return &Error{