[management] fix posture check evaluation for direct peers in policy definition (#7348)

This commit is contained in:
Pascal Fischer
2026-08-28 16:46:42 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 611a9291cd
commit 353251d886
19 changed files with 698 additions and 119 deletions

View File

@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ func peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData *networkmap.NetworkMapData, peerID string)
if policy == nil || !policy.Enabled || len(policy.SourcePostureChecks) == 0 {
continue
}
if !isPeerInPolicySourceGroupsFromData(nmData, peerID, policy) {
if !isPeerInPolicySourcesFromData(nmData, peerID, policy) {
continue
}
for _, checkID := range policy.SourcePostureChecks {
@@ -590,11 +590,14 @@ func peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData *networkmap.NetworkMapData, peerID string)
return maps.Values(peerPostureChecks)
}
func isPeerInPolicySourceGroupsFromData(nmData *networkmap.NetworkMapData, peerID string, policy *nmdata.Policy) bool {
func isPeerInPolicySourcesFromData(nmData *networkmap.NetworkMapData, peerID string, policy *nmdata.Policy) bool {
for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
if rule == nil || !rule.Enabled {
continue
}
if rule.SourceResource.Type == string(types.ResourceTypePeer) && rule.SourceResource.ID == peerID {
return true
}
for _, groupID := range rule.Sources {
if group := nmData.Groups[groupID]; group != nil && slices.Contains(group.Peers, peerID) {
return true
@@ -1314,7 +1317,7 @@ func computeForwarderPortFromVersions(wtVersions []string, requiredVersion strin
// addPolicyPostureChecks adds posture checks from a policy to the peer posture checks map if the peer is in the policy's source groups.
func addPolicyPostureChecks(account *types.Account, peerID string, policy *types.Policy, peerPostureChecks map[string]*posture.Checks) error {
isInGroup, err := isPeerInPolicySourceGroups(account, peerID, policy)
isInGroup, err := isPeerInPolicySources(account, peerID, policy)
if err != nil {
return err
}
@@ -1334,13 +1337,17 @@ func addPolicyPostureChecks(account *types.Account, peerID string, policy *types
return nil
}
// isPeerInPolicySourceGroups checks if a peer is present in any of the policy rule source groups.
func isPeerInPolicySourceGroups(account *types.Account, peerID string, policy *types.Policy) (bool, error) {
// isPeerInPolicySources checks if a peer is a source of the policy, directly or through a source group.
func isPeerInPolicySources(account *types.Account, peerID string, policy *types.Policy) (bool, error) {
for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
if !rule.Enabled {
continue
}
if rule.SourceResource.Type == types.ResourceTypePeer && rule.SourceResource.ID == peerID {
return true, nil
}
for _, sourceGroup := range rule.Sources {
group := account.GetGroup(sourceGroup)
if group == nil {

View File

@@ -4,35 +4,65 @@ import (
"testing"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/shared/management/networkmap"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/shared/management/networkmap/nmdata"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/shared/management/types"
)
func TestPeerPostureChecksFromData_ReturnsTwinsUnchanged(t *testing.T) {
check := &nmdata.PostureChecks{
ID: "pc1",
Checks: nmdata.ChecksDefinition{
NBVersionCheck: &nmdata.NBVersionCheck{MinVersion: "0.30.0"},
OSVersionCheck: &nmdata.OSVersionCheck{Linux: &nmdata.MinKernelVersionCheck{MinKernelVersion: "6.1"}},
func postureSelectionData(policies ...*nmdata.Policy) *networkmap.NetworkMapData {
return &networkmap.NetworkMapData{
Groups: map[string]*nmdata.Group{"g-src": {ID: "g-src", Peers: []string{"peer-group"}}},
Policies: policies,
PostureChecks: map[string]*nmdata.PostureChecks{
"pc1": {ID: "pc1", Checks: nmdata.ChecksDefinition{NBVersionCheck: &nmdata.NBVersionCheck{MinVersion: "0.30.0"}}},
},
}
nmData := &networkmap.NetworkMapData{
Groups: map[string]*nmdata.Group{"g1": {ID: "g1", Peers: []string{"peer1"}}},
Policies: []*nmdata.Policy{{
ID: "policy1",
Enabled: true,
SourcePostureChecks: []string{"pc1"},
Rules: []*nmdata.PolicyRule{{ID: "rule1", Enabled: true, Sources: []string{"g1"}}},
}},
PostureChecks: map[string]*nmdata.PostureChecks{"pc1": check},
}
got := peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData, "peer1")
require.Len(t, got, 1)
assert.Same(t, check, got[0])
assert.Len(t, got[0].GetChecks(), 2)
assert.Empty(t, peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData, "peer-outside-source-group"))
}
func gatedPolicy(id string, rule *nmdata.PolicyRule, checkIDs ...string) *nmdata.Policy {
return &nmdata.Policy{ID: id, Enabled: true, SourcePostureChecks: checkIDs, Rules: []*nmdata.PolicyRule{rule}}
}
func checkIDs(checks []*nmdata.PostureChecks) []string {
ids := make([]string, 0, len(checks))
for _, c := range checks {
ids = append(ids, c.ID)
}
return ids
}
func TestPeerPostureChecksFromData_SelectsPolicySourcePeers(t *testing.T) {
groupRule := &nmdata.PolicyRule{ID: "r-group", Enabled: true, Sources: []string{"g-src"}, Destinations: []string{"g-dst"}}
directRule := &nmdata.PolicyRule{ID: "r-direct", Enabled: true, SourceResource: nmdata.Resource{ID: "peer-direct", Type: string(types.ResourceTypePeer)}, Destinations: []string{"g-dst"}}
t.Run("source group member and direct source peer both get the checks", func(t *testing.T) {
nmData := postureSelectionData(gatedPolicy("p1", groupRule, "pc1"), gatedPolicy("p2", directRule, "pc1"))
assert.Equal(t, []string{"pc1"}, checkIDs(peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData, "peer-group")))
assert.Equal(t, []string{"pc1"}, checkIDs(peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData, "peer-direct")))
assert.Empty(t, peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData, "peer-elsewhere"))
})
t.Run("source resource of a non-peer type never matches a peer", func(t *testing.T) {
hostRule := &nmdata.PolicyRule{ID: "r-host", Enabled: true, SourceResource: nmdata.Resource{ID: "peer-direct", Type: string(types.ResourceTypeHost)}, Destinations: []string{"g-dst"}}
nmData := postureSelectionData(gatedPolicy("p1", hostRule, "pc1"))
assert.Empty(t, peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData, "peer-direct"))
})
t.Run("same check through two policies is returned once", func(t *testing.T) {
nmData := postureSelectionData(gatedPolicy("p1", groupRule, "pc1"), gatedPolicy("p2", groupRule, "pc1"))
assert.Equal(t, []string{"pc1"}, checkIDs(peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData, "peer-group")))
})
t.Run("disabled policy, disabled rule and dangling check are ignored", func(t *testing.T) {
disabledPolicy := gatedPolicy("p-off", groupRule, "pc1")
disabledPolicy.Enabled = false
disabledRule := &nmdata.PolicyRule{ID: "r-off", Enabled: false, Sources: []string{"g-src"}}
nmData := postureSelectionData(disabledPolicy, gatedPolicy("p-rule-off", disabledRule, "pc1"), gatedPolicy("p-dangling", groupRule, "pc-missing"))
assert.Empty(t, peerPostureChecksFromData(nmData, "peer-group"))
})
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
{
"description": "A peer named directly as a rule source or destination is subject to approval exactly like a group member: unvalidated peer-b is neither a source for peer-c nor a destination for peer-a, while the validated direct source peer-a reaches peer-c. Legacy mode is excluded: the frozen legacynmap copy still carries the direct-peer bypass.",
"peers": ["peer-a", "peer-c"],
"modes": ["full", "envelope"]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
{
"Serial": "22",
"peerConfig": {
"address": "100.64.0.1/10",
"sshConfig": {},
"fqdn": "peer-a.netbird.test",
"autoUpdate": {}
},
"remotePeers": [
{
"wgPubKey": "4deEImv8zGvsyBmmfC2G0eQkbyMzyGuz/YK7pcYETwM=",
"allowedIps": [
"100.64.0.3/32"
],
"sshConfig": {},
"fqdn": "peer-c.netbird.test",
"agentVersion": "0.60.0"
}
],
"DNSConfig": {
"ServiceEnable": true,
"CustomZones": [
{
"Domain": "netbird.test.",
"Records": [
{
"Name": "peer-a.netbird.test",
"Type": "1",
"Class": "IN",
"TTL": "300",
"RData": "100.64.0.1"
},
{
"Name": "peer-c.netbird.test",
"Type": "1",
"Class": "IN",
"TTL": "300",
"RData": "100.64.0.3"
}
]
}
],
"ForwarderPort": "22054"
},
"FirewallRules": [
{
"PeerIP": "100.64.0.3",
"Protocol": "TCP",
"Port": "443",
"PolicyID": "cG9sLWRpcmVjdC1vaw=="
},
{
"PeerIP": "100.64.0.3",
"Direction": "OUT",
"Protocol": "TCP",
"Port": "443",
"PolicyID": "cG9sLWRpcmVjdC1vaw=="
}
],
"routesFirewallRulesIsEmpty": true,
"sshAuth": {
"UserIDClaim": "sub"
}
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
{
"Serial": "22",
"peerConfig": {
"address": "100.64.0.3/10",
"sshConfig": {},
"fqdn": "peer-c.netbird.test",
"autoUpdate": {}
},
"remotePeers": [
{
"wgPubKey": "vblMc9U8RAI6cVopcKEMTVT6lVC3D9nTTMSwot5d3L4=",
"allowedIps": [
"100.64.0.1/32"
],
"sshConfig": {},
"fqdn": "peer-a.netbird.test",
"agentVersion": "0.60.0"
}
],
"DNSConfig": {
"ServiceEnable": true,
"CustomZones": [
{
"Domain": "netbird.test.",
"Records": [
{
"Name": "peer-a.netbird.test",
"Type": "1",
"Class": "IN",
"TTL": "300",
"RData": "100.64.0.1"
},
{
"Name": "peer-c.netbird.test",
"Type": "1",
"Class": "IN",
"TTL": "300",
"RData": "100.64.0.3"
}
]
}
],
"ForwarderPort": "22054"
},
"FirewallRules": [
{
"PeerIP": "100.64.0.1",
"Protocol": "TCP",
"Port": "443",
"PolicyID": "cG9sLWRpcmVjdC1vaw=="
},
{
"PeerIP": "100.64.0.1",
"Direction": "OUT",
"Protocol": "TCP",
"Port": "443",
"PolicyID": "cG9sLWRpcmVjdC1vaw=="
}
],
"routesFirewallRulesIsEmpty": true,
"sshAuth": {
"UserIDClaim": "sub"
}
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
{
"Network": {"Serial": 22},
"Peers": {
"peer-a": {"IP": "100.64.0.1", "Meta": {"WtVersion": "0.60.0"}},
"peer-b": {"IP": "100.64.0.2", "Meta": {"WtVersion": "0.60.0"}},
"peer-c": {"IP": "100.64.0.3", "Meta": {"WtVersion": "0.60.0"}}
},
"ValidatedPeers": {"peer-a": {}, "peer-c": {}},
"Groups": {
"grp-dev": {"Peers": ["peer-a"]},
"grp-ops": {"Peers": ["peer-c"]}
},
"Policies": [
{
"ID": "pol-direct-ok",
"PublicID": "pol-direct-ok-pub",
"Enabled": true,
"Rules": [
{
"Enabled": true,
"Action": "accept",
"Protocol": "tcp",
"Ports": ["443"],
"Bidirectional": true,
"SourceResource": {"ID": "peer-a", "Type": "peer"},
"Destinations": ["grp-ops"]
}
]
},
{
"ID": "pol-src-unval",
"PublicID": "pol-src-unval-pub",
"Enabled": true,
"Rules": [
{
"Enabled": true,
"Action": "accept",
"Protocol": "tcp",
"Ports": ["8443"],
"Bidirectional": true,
"SourceResource": {"ID": "peer-b", "Type": "peer"},
"Destinations": ["grp-ops"]
}
]
},
{
"ID": "pol-dst-unval",
"PublicID": "pol-dst-unval-pub",
"Enabled": true,
"Rules": [
{
"Enabled": true,
"Action": "accept",
"Protocol": "tcp",
"Ports": ["9443"],
"Bidirectional": true,
"Sources": ["grp-dev"],
"DestinationResource": {"ID": "peer-b", "Type": "peer"}
}
]
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
{
"description": "A peer named directly as a rule source is gated by the policy's posture checks exactly like a group member: peer-b (0.40.0) fails the 0.45.0 minimum, so it gets no connectivity and peer-c must not see it, while the compliant direct source peer-a reaches peer-c. Legacy mode is excluded: the frozen legacynmap copy still carries the direct-peer bypass.",
"peers": ["peer-b", "peer-c"],
"modes": ["full", "envelope"]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
{
"Serial": "21",
"peerConfig": {
"address": "100.64.0.2/10",
"sshConfig": {},
"fqdn": "peer-b.netbird.test",
"autoUpdate": {}
},
"remotePeersIsEmpty": true,
"DNSConfig": {
"ServiceEnable": true,
"CustomZones": [
{
"Domain": "netbird.test.",
"Records": [
{
"Name": "peer-b.netbird.test",
"Type": "1",
"Class": "IN",
"TTL": "300",
"RData": "100.64.0.2"
}
]
}
],
"ForwarderPort": "5353"
},
"firewallRulesIsEmpty": true,
"routesFirewallRulesIsEmpty": true,
"sshAuth": {
"UserIDClaim": "sub"
}
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
{
"Serial": "21",
"peerConfig": {
"address": "100.64.0.3/10",
"sshConfig": {},
"fqdn": "peer-c.netbird.test",
"autoUpdate": {}
},
"remotePeers": [
{
"wgPubKey": "vblMc9U8RAI6cVopcKEMTVT6lVC3D9nTTMSwot5d3L4=",
"allowedIps": [
"100.64.0.1/32"
],
"sshConfig": {},
"fqdn": "peer-a.netbird.test",
"agentVersion": "0.60.0"
}
],
"DNSConfig": {
"ServiceEnable": true,
"CustomZones": [
{
"Domain": "netbird.test.",
"Records": [
{
"Name": "peer-a.netbird.test",
"Type": "1",
"Class": "IN",
"TTL": "300",
"RData": "100.64.0.1"
},
{
"Name": "peer-c.netbird.test",
"Type": "1",
"Class": "IN",
"TTL": "300",
"RData": "100.64.0.3"
}
]
}
],
"ForwarderPort": "5353"
},
"FirewallRules": [
{
"PeerIP": "100.64.0.1",
"Protocol": "TCP",
"Port": "443",
"PolicyID": "cG9sLWRpcmVjdC1vaw=="
},
{
"PeerIP": "100.64.0.1",
"Direction": "OUT",
"Protocol": "TCP",
"Port": "443",
"PolicyID": "cG9sLWRpcmVjdC1vaw=="
}
],
"routesFirewallRulesIsEmpty": true,
"sshAuth": {
"UserIDClaim": "sub"
}
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
{
"Network": {"Serial": 21},
"Peers": {
"peer-a": {"IP": "100.64.0.1", "Meta": {"WtVersion": "0.60.0"}},
"peer-b": {"IP": "100.64.0.2", "Meta": {"WtVersion": "0.40.0"}},
"peer-c": {"IP": "100.64.0.3", "Meta": {"WtVersion": "0.60.0"}}
},
"Groups": {
"grp-ops": {"Peers": ["peer-c"]}
},
"PostureChecks": {
"chk-ver": {"Checks": {"NBVersionCheck": {"MinVersion": "0.45.0"}}}
},
"PostureCheckXIDToPublicID": {"chk-ver": "chk-ver-pub"},
"Policies": [
{
"ID": "pol-direct-ok",
"PublicID": "pol-direct-ok-pub",
"Enabled": true,
"SourcePostureChecks": ["chk-ver"],
"Rules": [
{
"Enabled": true,
"Action": "accept",
"Protocol": "tcp",
"Ports": ["443"],
"Bidirectional": true,
"SourceResource": {"ID": "peer-a", "Type": "peer"},
"Destinations": ["grp-ops"]
}
]
},
{
"ID": "pol-direct-denied",
"PublicID": "pol-direct-denied-pub",
"Enabled": true,
"SourcePostureChecks": ["chk-ver"],
"Rules": [
{
"Enabled": true,
"Action": "accept",
"Protocol": "tcp",
"Ports": ["8443"],
"Bidirectional": true,
"SourceResource": {"ID": "peer-b", "Type": "peer"},
"Destinations": ["grp-ops"]
}
]
}
]
}

View File

@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_GroupAddResource_RefreshesRoutingPeer(t *testing.T) {
assert.NotContains(t, affected, s.unrelatedPeerID, "unrelated peer must not be affected")
}
func (s *routerScenario) createPostureCheckGatedPolicy(t *testing.T, ctx context.Context) string {
func (s *routerScenario) createPostureCheckGatedPolicy(t *testing.T, ctx context.Context, policy *types.Policy) string {
t.Helper()
check, err := s.manager.SavePostureChecks(ctx, s.accountID, userID, &posture.Checks{
@@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ func (s *routerScenario) createPostureCheckGatedPolicy(t *testing.T, ctx context
}, true)
require.NoError(t, err)
policy := peerToResourcePolicyByGroup(s.sourceGroupID, s.resourceGroupID)
policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{check.ID}
_, err = s.manager.SavePolicy(ctx, s.accountID, userID, policy, true)
require.NoError(t, err)
@@ -169,7 +168,7 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_E2E_SavePostureCheck_RefreshesRoutingPeer(t *testing.T) {
s := setupRouterScenario(t, true)
ctx := context.Background()
checkID := s.createPostureCheckGatedPolicy(t, ctx)
checkID := s.createPostureCheckGatedPolicy(t, ctx, peerToResourcePolicyByGroup(s.sourceGroupID, s.resourceGroupID))
srcCh := s.updateManager.CreateChannel(ctx, s.sourcePeerID)
routerCh := s.updateManager.CreateChannel(ctx, s.routerPeerID)
@@ -347,11 +346,28 @@ func TestAffectedPeers_PeerChange_RouterInOtherNetworkNotAffected(t *testing.T)
// shortcut (the denied peer's map holds no router) and the allow direction
// depends on which meta field moved, leaving the routers with a stale map.
func TestAffectedPeers_E2E_PostureFlip_RefreshesRoutingPeer(t *testing.T) {
runPostureFlipRefreshesRoutingPeer(t, func(s *routerScenario) *types.Policy {
return peerToResourcePolicyByGroup(s.sourceGroupID, s.resourceGroupID)
})
}
// TestAffectedPeers_E2E_PostureFlip_DirectSourcePeer_RefreshesRoutingPeer is the same
// scenario with the source peer named directly in the rule: it must receive its posture
// checks and have its flips detected exactly like a group member.
func TestAffectedPeers_E2E_PostureFlip_DirectSourcePeer_RefreshesRoutingPeer(t *testing.T) {
runPostureFlipRefreshesRoutingPeer(t, func(s *routerScenario) *types.Policy {
return peerToResourcePolicyByPeer(s.sourcePeerID, s.resourceGroupID)
})
}
func runPostureFlipRefreshesRoutingPeer(t *testing.T, policyFor func(s *routerScenario) *types.Policy) {
t.Helper()
manager, updateManager := createManagerWithNetworkMapStore(t)
s := buildRouterScenario(t, manager, updateManager, true)
ctx := context.Background()
s.createPostureCheckGatedPolicy(t, ctx)
s.createPostureCheckGatedPolicy(t, ctx, policyFor(s))
source, err := s.manager.Store.GetPeerByID(ctx, store.LockingStrengthNone, s.accountID, s.sourcePeerID)
require.NoError(t, err)

View File

@@ -173,6 +173,23 @@ func peerToResourcePolicyByGroup(sourceGroupID, resourceGroupID string) *types.P
}
}
// peerToResourcePolicyByPeer builds a policy naming the source peer directly via
// SourceResource rather than through a group.
func peerToResourcePolicyByPeer(sourcePeerID, resourceGroupID string) *types.Policy {
return &types.Policy{
Enabled: true,
Name: "peer-to-resource-by-peer",
Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{
{
Enabled: true,
SourceResource: types.Resource{ID: sourcePeerID, Type: types.ResourceTypePeer},
Destinations: []string{resourceGroupID},
Action: types.PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
}
// peerToResourcePolicyByResource builds a policy referencing the resource
// directly via DestinationResource rather than its group.
func peerToResourcePolicyByResource(sourceGroupID, resourceID string) *types.Policy {

View File

@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ func getPeerLoginInfo(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID st
return nil, nil, false, err
}
postureChecks, err := getPeerPostureChecks(ctx, transaction, accountID, peerGroupIDs, policies)
postureChecks, err := getPeerPostureChecks(ctx, transaction, accountID, peer.ID, peerGroupIDs, policies)
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, false, err
}
@@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ func isPeerSSHEnabled(ctx context.Context, peer *nbpeer.Peer, policies []*types.
}
// getPeerPostureChecks returns the posture checks for the peer.
func getPeerPostureChecks(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID string, peerGroupIDs []string, policies []*types.Policy) ([]*nmdata.PostureChecks, error) {
func getPeerPostureChecks(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID, peerID string, peerGroupIDs []string, policies []*types.Policy) ([]*nmdata.PostureChecks, error) {
if len(policies) == 0 {
return nil, nil
}
@@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ func getPeerPostureChecks(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountI
continue
}
postureChecksIDs := processPeerPostureChecks(policy, peerGroupIDs)
postureChecksIDs := processPeerPostureChecks(policy, peerID, peerGroupIDs)
peerPostureChecksIDs = append(peerPostureChecksIDs, postureChecksIDs...)
}
@@ -1395,13 +1395,17 @@ func getPeerPostureChecks(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountI
return types.TwinPostureChecksList(maps.Values(peerPostureChecks)), nil
}
// processPeerPostureChecks checks if the peer is in the source group of the policy and returns the posture checks.
func processPeerPostureChecks(policy *types.Policy, peerGroupIDs []string) []string {
// processPeerPostureChecks returns the policy's posture checks when the peer is a source of the policy, directly or through a source group.
func processPeerPostureChecks(policy *types.Policy, peerID string, peerGroupIDs []string) []string {
for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
if !rule.Enabled {
continue
}
if rule.SourceResource.Type == types.ResourceTypePeer && rule.SourceResource.ID == peerID {
return policy.SourcePostureChecks
}
for _, sourceGroup := range rule.Sources {
if slices.Contains(peerGroupIDs, sourceGroup) {
return policy.SourcePostureChecks

View File

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import (
nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/posture"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/types"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/shared/management/networkmap/nmdata"
)
@@ -181,3 +182,22 @@ func TestMetaDiffAffectsPosture_NoChecks(t *testing.T) {
)
assert.False(t, metaDiffAffectsPosture(diff, nil))
}
func TestProcessPeerPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
policy := &types.Policy{
Enabled: true,
SourcePostureChecks: []string{"pc1"},
Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{
{Enabled: false, Sources: []string{"g-disabled"}, SourceResource: types.Resource{ID: "peer-disabled", Type: types.ResourceTypePeer}},
{Enabled: true, Sources: []string{"g-src"}, Destinations: []string{"g-dst"}},
{Enabled: true, SourceResource: types.Resource{ID: "peer-direct", Type: types.ResourceTypePeer}, Destinations: []string{"g-dst"}},
{Enabled: true, SourceResource: types.Resource{ID: "peer-as-host", Type: types.ResourceTypeHost}, Destinations: []string{"g-dst"}},
},
}
assert.Equal(t, []string{"pc1"}, processPeerPostureChecks(policy, "peer-in-group", []string{"g-src"}), "source group member")
assert.Equal(t, []string{"pc1"}, processPeerPostureChecks(policy, "peer-direct", nil), "direct source peer")
assert.Empty(t, processPeerPostureChecks(policy, "peer-elsewhere", []string{"g-dst"}), "destination-only peer")
assert.Empty(t, processPeerPostureChecks(policy, "peer-disabled", []string{"g-disabled"}), "disabled rule")
assert.Empty(t, processPeerPostureChecks(policy, "peer-as-host", nil), "source resource of a non-peer type")
}

View File

@@ -909,13 +909,13 @@ func (a *Account) GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx context.Context, peer *nbpeer.P
var peerInSources, peerInDestinations bool
if rule.SourceResource.Type == ResourceTypePeer && rule.SourceResource.ID != "" {
sourcePeers, peerInSources = a.getPeerFromResource(rule.SourceResource, peer.ID)
sourcePeers, peerInSources = a.getPeerFromResource(ctx, rule.SourceResource, peer.ID, policy.SourcePostureChecks, validatedPeersMap)
} else {
sourcePeers, peerInSources = a.getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx, rule.Sources, peer.ID, policy.SourcePostureChecks, validatedPeersMap)
}
if rule.DestinationResource.Type == ResourceTypePeer && rule.DestinationResource.ID != "" {
destinationPeers, peerInDestinations = a.getPeerFromResource(rule.DestinationResource, peer.ID)
destinationPeers, peerInDestinations = a.getPeerFromResource(ctx, rule.DestinationResource, peer.ID, nil, validatedPeersMap)
} else {
destinationPeers, peerInDestinations = a.getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx, rule.Destinations, peer.ID, nil, validatedPeersMap)
}
@@ -1120,8 +1120,17 @@ func ruleHasDestination(rule *PolicyRule, peerID string, peerGroupIDs map[string
// Important: Posture checks are applicable only to source group peers,
// for destination group peers, call this method with an empty list of sourcePostureChecksIDs
func (a *Account) getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx context.Context, groups []string, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) ([]*nbpeer.Peer, bool) {
return a.filterPolicyPeers(ctx, a.getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(ctx, groups), peerID, sourcePostureChecksIDs, validatedPeersMap)
}
// getPeerFromResource resolves a rule side that names a peer directly, admitting it
// like a member of a group holding only that peer.
func (a *Account) getPeerFromResource(ctx context.Context, resource Resource, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) ([]*nbpeer.Peer, bool) {
return a.filterPolicyPeers(ctx, []string{resource.ID}, peerID, sourcePostureChecksIDs, validatedPeersMap)
}
func (a *Account) filterPolicyPeers(ctx context.Context, uniquePeerIDs []string, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) ([]*nbpeer.Peer, bool) {
peerInGroups := false
uniquePeerIDs := a.getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(ctx, groups)
filteredPeers := make([]*nbpeer.Peer, 0, len(uniquePeerIDs))
for _, p := range uniquePeerIDs {
peer, ok := a.Peers[p]
@@ -1150,19 +1159,6 @@ func (a *Account) getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx context.Context, groups []string, pe
return filteredPeers, peerInGroups
}
func (a *Account) getPeerFromResource(resource Resource, peerID string) ([]*nbpeer.Peer, bool) {
peer := a.GetPeer(resource.ID)
if peer == nil {
return []*nbpeer.Peer{}, false
}
if peer.ID == peerID {
return []*nbpeer.Peer{}, true
}
return []*nbpeer.Peer{peer}, false
}
// validatePostureChecksOnPeer validates the posture checks on a peer
func (a *Account) validatePostureChecksOnPeer(ctx context.Context, sourcePostureChecksID []string, peerID string) bool {
peer, ok := a.Peers[peerID]

View File

@@ -875,6 +875,89 @@ func TestComponents_PeerAsSourceResource(t *testing.T) {
assert.True(t, has443, "peer-0 as source resource should have port 443 rule")
}
func hasFirewallRuleTo(nm *types.NetworkMap, peerIP, port string) bool {
for _, rule := range nm.FirewallRules {
if rule.PeerIP == peerIP && rule.Port == port {
return true
}
}
return false
}
// TestComponents_PeerAsSourceResource_PostureChecks verifies that a directly referenced
// source peer is gated by the policy's posture checks like a member of a group holding only
// that peer: peer-1 (0.25.0) fails the 0.26.0 minimum, peer-2 (0.40.0) passes.
func TestComponents_PeerAsSourceResource_PostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
account, validatedPeers := scalableTestAccountWithoutDefaultPolicy(20, 2)
for _, sourcePeerID := range []string{"peer-1", "peer-2"} {
account.Policies = append(account.Policies, &types.Policy{
ID: "policy-peer-src-" + sourcePeerID, Name: "Peer Source " + sourcePeerID, Enabled: true, AccountID: "test-account",
SourcePostureChecks: []string{"posture-check-ver"},
Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{{
ID: "rule-peer-src-" + sourcePeerID, Enabled: true,
Action: types.PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
Protocol: types.PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
Bidirectional: true,
Ports: []string{"9443"},
SourceResource: types.Resource{ID: sourcePeerID, Type: types.ResourceTypePeer},
Destinations: []string{"group-0"},
}},
})
}
nm0 := componentsNetworkMap(account, "peer-0", validatedPeers)
require.NotNil(t, nm0)
assert.False(t, hasFirewallRuleTo(nm0, "100.64.0.1", "9443"), "destination must not see the direct source peer failing the posture check")
assert.True(t, hasFirewallRuleTo(nm0, "100.64.0.2", "9443"), "destination must see the direct source peer passing the posture check")
nm1 := componentsNetworkMap(account, "peer-1", validatedPeers)
require.NotNil(t, nm1)
assert.False(t, hasFirewallRuleTo(nm1, "100.64.0.0", "9443"), "a direct source peer failing the posture check gets no policy connectivity")
nm2 := componentsNetworkMap(account, "peer-2", validatedPeers)
require.NotNil(t, nm2)
assert.True(t, hasFirewallRuleTo(nm2, "100.64.0.0", "9443"), "a direct source peer passing the posture check gets policy connectivity")
}
// TestComponents_PeerAsResource_Unvalidated verifies that a directly referenced peer is
// subject to approval like a group member, whether it is the rule's source or destination.
func TestComponents_PeerAsResource_Unvalidated(t *testing.T) {
account, validatedPeers := scalableTestAccountWithoutDefaultPolicy(20, 2)
delete(validatedPeers, "peer-2")
account.Policies = append(account.Policies,
&types.Policy{
ID: "policy-unval-src", Name: "Unvalidated Source", Enabled: true, AccountID: "test-account",
Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{{
ID: "rule-unval-src", Enabled: true,
Action: types.PolicyTrafficActionAccept, Protocol: types.PolicyRuleProtocolTCP, Bidirectional: true,
Ports: []string{"9443"},
SourceResource: types.Resource{ID: "peer-2", Type: types.ResourceTypePeer},
Destinations: []string{"group-0"},
}},
},
&types.Policy{
ID: "policy-unval-dst", Name: "Unvalidated Destination", Enabled: true, AccountID: "test-account",
Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{{
ID: "rule-unval-dst", Enabled: true,
Action: types.PolicyTrafficActionAccept, Protocol: types.PolicyRuleProtocolTCP, Bidirectional: true,
Ports: []string{"9444"},
Sources: []string{"group-0"},
DestinationResource: types.Resource{ID: "peer-2", Type: types.ResourceTypePeer},
}},
},
)
nm0 := componentsNetworkMap(account, "peer-0", validatedPeers)
require.NotNil(t, nm0)
assert.False(t, hasFirewallRuleTo(nm0, "100.64.0.2", "9443"), "an unvalidated direct source peer must not be admitted")
assert.False(t, hasFirewallRuleTo(nm0, "100.64.0.2", "9444"), "an unvalidated direct destination peer must not be admitted")
for _, p := range nm0.Peers {
assert.NotEqual(t, "peer-2", p.ID, "an unvalidated direct peer must not be shipped as a remote peer")
}
}
// TestComponents_PeerAsDestinationResource verifies that a policy with DestinationResource.Type=Peer
// targets only that specific peer as the destination.
func TestComponents_PeerAsDestinationResource(t *testing.T) {

View File

@@ -324,19 +324,13 @@ func (nmd *NetworkMapData) getPeersGroupsPoliciesRoutes(
var peerInSources, peerInDestinations bool
if rule.SourceResource.Type == string(types.ResourceTypePeer) && rule.SourceResource.ID != "" {
sourcePeers = []string{rule.SourceResource.ID}
if rule.SourceResource.ID == peerID {
peerInSources = true
}
sourcePeers, peerInSources = nmd.getPeerFromResource(rule.SourceResource, peerID, policy.SourcePostureChecks, postureFailedPeers)
} else {
sourcePeers, peerInSources = nmd.getPeersFromGroups(rule.Sources, peerID, policy.SourcePostureChecks, postureFailedPeers)
}
if rule.DestinationResource.Type == string(types.ResourceTypePeer) && rule.DestinationResource.ID != "" {
destinationPeers = []string{rule.DestinationResource.ID}
if rule.DestinationResource.ID == peerID {
peerInDestinations = true
}
destinationPeers, peerInDestinations = nmd.getPeerFromResource(rule.DestinationResource, peerID, nil, postureFailedPeers)
} else {
destinationPeers, peerInDestinations = nmd.getPeersFromGroups(rule.Destinations, peerID, nil, postureFailedPeers)
}
@@ -403,30 +397,16 @@ func (nmd *NetworkMapData) getPeersFromGroups(groups []string, peerID string, so
filteredPeerIDs = make([]string, 0, len(group.Peers))
peerInGroups = false
for _, pid := range group.Peers {
peer, ok := nmd.Peers[pid]
if !ok || peer == nil {
if !nmd.admitPolicyPeer(pid, sourcePostureChecksIDs, postureFailedPeers) {
continue
}
if _, ok := nmd.ValidatedPeers[peer.ID]; !ok {
continue
}
isValid, pname := nmd.validatePostureChecksOnPeerGetFailed(sourcePostureChecksIDs, peer.ID)
if !isValid && len(pname) > 0 {
if _, ok := (*postureFailedPeers)[pname]; !ok {
(*postureFailedPeers)[pname] = make(map[string]struct{})
}
(*postureFailedPeers)[pname][peer.ID] = struct{}{}
continue
}
if peer.ID == peerID {
if pid == peerID {
peerInGroups = true
continue
}
filteredPeerIDs = append(filteredPeerIDs, peer.ID)
filteredPeerIDs = append(filteredPeerIDs, pid)
}
return filteredPeerIDs, peerInGroups
}
@@ -436,36 +416,59 @@ func (nmd *NetworkMapData) getPeersFromGroups(groups []string, peerID string, so
continue
}
seenPeerIds[pid] = struct{}{}
peer, ok := nmd.Peers[pid]
if !ok || peer == nil {
if !nmd.admitPolicyPeer(pid, sourcePostureChecksIDs, postureFailedPeers) {
continue
}
if _, ok := nmd.ValidatedPeers[peer.ID]; !ok {
continue
}
isValid, pname := nmd.validatePostureChecksOnPeerGetFailed(sourcePostureChecksIDs, peer.ID)
if !isValid && len(pname) > 0 {
if _, ok := (*postureFailedPeers)[pname]; !ok {
(*postureFailedPeers)[pname] = make(map[string]struct{})
}
(*postureFailedPeers)[pname][peer.ID] = struct{}{}
continue
}
if peer.ID == peerID {
if pid == peerID {
peerInGroups = true
continue
}
filteredPeerIDs = append(filteredPeerIDs, peer.ID)
filteredPeerIDs = append(filteredPeerIDs, pid)
}
}
return filteredPeerIDs, peerInGroups
}
// getPeerFromResource resolves a rule side that names a peer directly, admitting it
// like a member of a group holding only that peer.
func (nmd *NetworkMapData) getPeerFromResource(resource nmdata.Resource, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string,
postureFailedPeers *map[string]map[string]struct{}) ([]string, bool) {
if !nmd.admitPolicyPeer(resource.ID, sourcePostureChecksIDs, postureFailedPeers) {
return nil, false
}
if resource.ID == peerID {
return nil, true
}
return []string{resource.ID}, false
}
// admitPolicyPeer applies the per-peer admission of a rule side: the peer must exist,
// be validated and pass the rule's posture checks. A failed check is recorded in
// postureFailedPeers.
func (nmd *NetworkMapData) admitPolicyPeer(pid string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string, postureFailedPeers *map[string]map[string]struct{}) bool {
peer, ok := nmd.Peers[pid]
if !ok || peer == nil {
return false
}
if _, ok := nmd.ValidatedPeers[pid]; !ok {
return false
}
isValid, pname := nmd.validatePostureChecksOnPeerGetFailed(sourcePostureChecksIDs, pid)
if !isValid && len(pname) > 0 {
if _, ok := (*postureFailedPeers)[pname]; !ok {
(*postureFailedPeers)[pname] = make(map[string]struct{})
}
(*postureFailedPeers)[pname][pid] = struct{}{}
return false
}
return true
}
func (nmd *NetworkMapData) validatePostureChecksOnPeerGetFailed(sourcePostureChecksID []string, peerID string) (bool, string) {
peer, ok := nmd.Peers[peerID]
if !ok || peer == nil {

View File

@@ -448,10 +448,9 @@ func TestGetPeerNetworkMapComponents_PeerResourceRules(t *testing.T) {
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{targetID, remote.ID}, peerIDSet(c.Peers))
})
// Legacy parity: directly referenced peers bypass the ValidatedPeers gate
// and posture checks that group-derived peers go through; the client-side
// Calculate shares this behavior via getPeerFromResource.
t.Run("unvalidated source resource peer still connects", func(t *testing.T) {
// A directly referenced peer is admitted like a member of a group holding only
// that peer: the ValidatedPeers gate and the posture checks apply equally.
t.Run("unvalidated source resource peer is excluded", func(t *testing.T) {
target := newPeer(targetID, 1)
unval := newPeer("peer-unval", 2)
nmd := newNMD(target, unval)
@@ -463,10 +462,10 @@ func TestGetPeerNetworkMapComponents_PeerResourceRules(t *testing.T) {
c := compute(nmd, targetID)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{targetID, unval.ID}, peerIDSet(c.Peers))
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{targetID}, peerIDSet(c.Peers))
})
t.Run("source resource peer bypasses posture checks", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("source resource peer failing posture checks is excluded", func(t *testing.T) {
target := newPeer(targetID, 1)
failing := newPeer("peer-failing", 2)
failing.Meta.WtVersion = failingVersion
@@ -481,10 +480,65 @@ func TestGetPeerNetworkMapComponents_PeerResourceRules(t *testing.T) {
c := compute(nmd, targetID)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{targetID, failing.ID}, peerIDSet(c.Peers))
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{targetID}, peerIDSet(c.Peers))
assert.Empty(t, c.PostureFailedPeers)
})
t.Run("direct source peer failure recorded when connected via another policy", func(t *testing.T) {
target := newPeer(targetID, 1)
failing := newPeer("peer-failing", 2)
failing.Meta.WtVersion = failingVersion
nmd := newNMD(target, failing)
addVersionCheck(nmd, "pc-1", postureMinVersion)
addGroup(nmd, "g-dst", targetID)
checkedRule := newRule(nil, []string{"g-dst"})
checkedRule.SourceResource = peerResource(failing.ID)
checked := newPolicy("p-checked", checkedRule)
checked.SourcePostureChecks = []string{"pc-1"}
openRule := newRule(nil, []string{"g-dst"})
openRule.SourceResource = peerResource(failing.ID)
nmd.Policies = []*nmdata.Policy{checked, newPolicy("p-open", openRule)}
c := compute(nmd, targetID)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{targetID, failing.ID}, peerIDSet(c.Peers))
assert.Equal(t, map[string]map[string]struct{}{"pc-1": {failing.ID: {}}}, c.PostureFailedPeers)
})
t.Run("target as source resource failing posture checks gets no policy", func(t *testing.T) {
target := newPeer(targetID, 1)
target.Meta.WtVersion = failingVersion
dst := newPeer("peer-dst", 2)
nmd := newNMD(target, dst)
addVersionCheck(nmd, "pc-1", postureMinVersion)
addGroup(nmd, "g-dst", dst.ID)
rule := newRule(nil, []string{"g-dst"})
rule.SourceResource = peerResource(targetID)
p := newPolicy("p-1", rule)
p.SourcePostureChecks = []string{"pc-1"}
nmd.Policies = []*nmdata.Policy{p}
c := compute(nmd, targetID)
assert.Empty(t, policyIDs(c.Policies))
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{targetID}, peerIDSet(c.Peers))
})
t.Run("unvalidated destination resource peer is excluded", func(t *testing.T) {
target := newPeer(targetID, 1)
unval := newPeer("peer-unval", 2)
nmd := newNMD(target, unval)
delete(nmd.ValidatedPeers, unval.ID)
addGroup(nmd, "g-src", targetID)
rule := newRule([]string{"g-src"}, nil)
rule.DestinationResource = peerResource(unval.ID)
nmd.Policies = []*nmdata.Policy{newPolicy("p-1", rule)}
c := compute(nmd, targetID)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{targetID}, peerIDSet(c.Peers))
})
t.Run("unrelated peer resource rule ignored", func(t *testing.T) {
target := newPeer(targetID, 1)
a := newPeer("peer-a", 2)

View File

@@ -230,13 +230,13 @@ func (c *NetworkMapComponents) getPeerConnectionResources(targetPeerID string) (
var peerInSources, peerInDestinations bool
if rule.SourceResource.Type == string(ResourceTypePeer) && rule.SourceResource.ID != "" {
sourcePeers, peerInSources = c.getPeerFromResource(rule.SourceResource, targetPeerID)
sourcePeers, peerInSources = c.getPeerFromResource(rule.SourceResource, targetPeerID, policy.SourcePostureChecks)
} else {
sourcePeers, peerInSources = c.getAllPeersFromGroups(rule.Sources, targetPeerID, policy.SourcePostureChecks)
}
if rule.DestinationResource.Type == string(ResourceTypePeer) && rule.DestinationResource.ID != "" {
destinationPeers, peerInDestinations = c.getPeerFromResource(rule.DestinationResource, targetPeerID)
destinationPeers, peerInDestinations = c.getPeerFromResource(rule.DestinationResource, targetPeerID, nil)
} else {
destinationPeers, peerInDestinations = c.getAllPeersFromGroups(rule.Destinations, targetPeerID, nil)
}
@@ -373,8 +373,21 @@ func (c *NetworkMapComponents) connResourcesGenerator(targetPeer *nmdata.Peer) (
}
func (c *NetworkMapComponents) getAllPeersFromGroups(groups []string, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string) ([]*nmdata.Peer, bool) {
return c.filterPolicyPeers(c.getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(groups), peerID, sourcePostureChecksIDs)
}
// getPeerFromResource resolves a rule side that names a peer directly. The peer is
// subject to the same admission as a group member, so a direct peer behaves exactly
// like a group holding only that peer.
func (c *NetworkMapComponents) getPeerFromResource(resource nmdata.Resource, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string) ([]*nmdata.Peer, bool) {
return c.filterPolicyPeers([]string{resource.ID}, peerID, sourcePostureChecksIDs)
}
// filterPolicyPeers admits the peers of one rule side: known to the components and
// passing the rule's posture checks. It reports the admitted peers other than peerID
// and whether peerID itself is admitted on that side.
func (c *NetworkMapComponents) filterPolicyPeers(uniquePeerIDs []string, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string) ([]*nmdata.Peer, bool) {
peerInGroups := false
uniquePeerIDs := c.getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(groups)
filteredPeers := make([]*nmdata.Peer, 0, len(uniquePeerIDs))
for _, p := range uniquePeerIDs {
@@ -427,19 +440,6 @@ func (c *NetworkMapComponents) getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(groups []string) []
return ids
}
func (c *NetworkMapComponents) getPeerFromResource(resource nmdata.Resource, peerID string) ([]*nmdata.Peer, bool) {
if resource.ID == peerID {
return []*nmdata.Peer{}, true
}
peerInfo := c.GetPeerInfo(resource.ID)
if peerInfo == nil {
return []*nmdata.Peer{}, false
}
return []*nmdata.Peer{peerInfo}, false
}
func (c *NetworkMapComponents) filterPeersByLoginExpiration(aclPeers []*nmdata.Peer) ([]*nmdata.Peer, []*nmdata.Peer) {
peersToConnect := make([]*nmdata.Peer, 0, len(aclPeers))
var expiredPeers []*nmdata.Peer