Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into refactor/permissions-manager

This commit is contained in:
pascal
2026-09-11 13:55:02 +02:00
2126 changed files with 284567 additions and 42026 deletions
+84 -26
View File
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ func TestPostureCheckAccountPeersUpdate(t *testing.T) {
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
case <-time.After(peerUpdateTimeout):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ func TestPostureCheckAccountPeersUpdate(t *testing.T) {
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
case <-time.After(peerUpdateTimeout):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ func TestPostureCheckAccountPeersUpdate(t *testing.T) {
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
case <-time.After(peerUpdateTimeout):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ func TestPostureCheckAccountPeersUpdate(t *testing.T) {
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
case <-time.After(peerUpdateTimeout):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ func TestPostureCheckAccountPeersUpdate(t *testing.T) {
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
case <-time.After(peerUpdateTimeout):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
@@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ func TestArePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(t *testing.T) {
policy := &types.Policy{
AccountID: account.Id,
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{
{
Enabled: true,
@@ -491,21 +492,20 @@ func TestArePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to save policy")
t.Run("posture check exists and is linked to policy with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
result, err := arePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, result)
groupIDs, _ := collectPostureCheckAffectedGroupsAndPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
assert.NotEmpty(t, groupIDs)
})
t.Run("posture check exists but is not linked to any policy", func(t *testing.T) {
result, err := arePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckB.ID)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, result)
groupIDs, directPeerIDs := collectPostureCheckAffectedGroupsAndPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckB.ID)
assert.Empty(t, groupIDs)
assert.Empty(t, directPeerIDs)
})
t.Run("posture check does not exist", func(t *testing.T) {
result, err := arePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, "unknown")
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, result)
groupIDs, directPeerIDs := collectPostureCheckAffectedGroupsAndPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, "unknown")
assert.Empty(t, groupIDs)
assert.Empty(t, directPeerIDs)
})
t.Run("posture check is linked to policy with no peers in source groups", func(t *testing.T) {
@@ -514,9 +514,8 @@ func TestArePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(t *testing.T) {
_, err = manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, adminUserID, policy, true)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to update policy")
result, err := arePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, result)
groupIDs, _ := collectPostureCheckAffectedGroupsAndPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
assert.NotEmpty(t, groupIDs)
})
t.Run("posture check is linked to policy with no peers in destination groups", func(t *testing.T) {
@@ -525,9 +524,8 @@ func TestArePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(t *testing.T) {
_, err = manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, adminUserID, policy, true)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to update policy")
result, err := arePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, result)
groupIDs, _ := collectPostureCheckAffectedGroupsAndPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
assert.NotEmpty(t, groupIDs)
})
t.Run("posture check is linked to policy but no peers in groups", func(t *testing.T) {
@@ -535,9 +533,9 @@ func TestArePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(t *testing.T) {
err = manager.UpdateGroup(context.Background(), account.Id, adminUserID, groupA)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to save groups")
result, err := arePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, result)
// The collector returns groups even if they have no peers — the groups are still referenced
groupIDs, _ := collectPostureCheckAffectedGroupsAndPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
assert.NotEmpty(t, groupIDs)
})
t.Run("posture check is linked to policy with non-existent group", func(t *testing.T) {
@@ -546,8 +544,68 @@ func TestArePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(t *testing.T) {
_, err = manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, adminUserID, policy, true)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to update policy")
result, err := arePostureCheckChangesAffectPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, result)
// Non-existent groups are filtered out during SavePolicy validation,
// so the saved policy has empty Sources/Destinations
groupIDs, directPeerIDs := collectPostureCheckAffectedGroupsAndPeers(context.Background(), manager.Store, account.Id, postureCheckA.ID)
assert.Empty(t, groupIDs)
assert.Empty(t, directPeerIDs)
})
}
// TestSavePostureChecks_AllocatesSeqIDOnCreate verifies that the create path
// (no incoming ID) allocates a non-zero AccountSeqID via the
// account_seq_counters table.
func TestSavePostureChecks_AllocatesSeqIDOnCreate(t *testing.T) {
am, _, err := createManager(t)
require.NoError(t, err)
account, err := initTestPostureChecksAccount(am)
require.NoError(t, err)
created, err := am.SavePostureChecks(context.Background(), account.Id, adminUserID, &posture.Checks{
Name: "seq-allocation-test",
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{MinVersion: "0.26.0"},
},
}, true)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NotEqual(t, "", created.PublicID, "SavePostureChecks on create must create PublicID")
}
// TestSavePostureChecks_PreservesSeqIDOnUpdate verifies the update path does
// not reset AccountSeqID even when the caller passes a zero value (REST
// handler shape, because the field is `json:"-"`).
func TestSavePostureChecks_PreservesSeqIDOnUpdate(t *testing.T) {
am, _, err := createManager(t)
require.NoError(t, err)
account, err := initTestPostureChecksAccount(am)
require.NoError(t, err)
created, err := am.SavePostureChecks(context.Background(), account.Id, adminUserID, &posture.Checks{
Name: "seq-preserve-original",
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{MinVersion: "0.26.0"},
},
}, true)
require.NoError(t, err)
originalPublicID := created.PublicID
require.NotEqual(t, "", originalPublicID)
update := &posture.Checks{
ID: created.ID,
Name: "seq-preserve-renamed",
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{MinVersion: "0.27.0"},
},
}
require.Equal(t, "", update.PublicID, "incoming struct must mirror an HTTP handler shape")
_, err = am.SavePostureChecks(context.Background(), account.Id, adminUserID, update, false)
require.NoError(t, err)
got, err := am.GetPostureChecks(context.Background(), account.Id, created.ID, adminUserID)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, originalPublicID, got.PublicID, "PublicID must survive SavePostureChecks update")
require.Equal(t, "seq-preserve-renamed", got.Name)
}