mirror of
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git
synced 2026-10-12 16:39:09 +02:00
The partial-failure test only placed the unknown ID after the valid exit node, so it never verified that selection processing continues past a leading invalid ID. Run the same assertions for both orderings.
130 lines
5.6 KiB
Go
130 lines
5.6 KiB
Go
package routemanager
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"net/netip"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/routeselector"
|
|
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/route"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func v6ExitRoute(netID, peer string) *route.Route {
|
|
return &route.Route{
|
|
NetID: route.NetID(netID),
|
|
Network: netip.MustParsePrefix("::/0"),
|
|
Peer: peer,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func newSelectionTestManager() *DefaultManager {
|
|
return &DefaultManager{
|
|
routeSelector: routeselector.NewRouteSelector(),
|
|
clientRoutes: route.HAMap{
|
|
"exitA|0.0.0.0/0": {exitRoute("exitA", "p1", true)},
|
|
"exitA-v6|::/0": {v6ExitRoute("exitA-v6", "p1")},
|
|
"exitB|0.0.0.0/0": {exitRoute("exitB", "p2", true)},
|
|
"lan|192.168.1.0/24": {{NetID: "lan", Network: netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.1.0/24"), Peer: "p3"}},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSelectRoutes_ExitNodeExclusivity(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := newSelectionTestManager()
|
|
|
|
// Selecting an exit node selects its v6 pair and deselects the sibling.
|
|
require.NoError(t, m.selectRoutes([]route.NetID{"exitA"}, true))
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitA"), "exitA should be selected")
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitA-v6"), "the v6 pair follows its v4 base")
|
|
assert.False(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitB"), "the sibling exit node must be deselected")
|
|
|
|
// Switching to the sibling deselects the previous exit node and its v6 pair.
|
|
require.NoError(t, m.selectRoutes([]route.NetID{"exitB"}, true))
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitB"), "exitB should now be selected")
|
|
assert.False(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitA"), "the previous exit node must be deselected")
|
|
assert.False(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitA-v6"), "the previous exit node's v6 pair must be deselected")
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("lan"), "non-exit route selection is untouched")
|
|
|
|
// Selecting a non-exit route leaves the active exit node alone.
|
|
require.NoError(t, m.selectRoutes([]route.NetID{"lan"}, true))
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitB"), "selecting a non-exit route keeps the exit node")
|
|
|
|
// Deselecting the active exit node turns every exit node off.
|
|
require.NoError(t, m.deselectRoutes([]route.NetID{"exitB"}))
|
|
assert.False(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitB"), "exitB should be deselected")
|
|
assert.False(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitA"), "exitA stays deselected")
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("lan"), "non-exit route selection is untouched")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSelectRoutes_PartialErrorStillEnforcesExclusivity(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// The unknown ID must be reported, but the valid exit node in the same
|
|
// request is still selected — so its sibling must still be deselected.
|
|
// Both orderings are covered: processing must continue past the invalid
|
|
// ID wherever it sits in the request.
|
|
requests := map[string][]route.NetID{
|
|
"invalid id first": {"missing", "exitB"},
|
|
"invalid id last": {"exitB", "missing"},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for name, ids := range requests {
|
|
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := newSelectionTestManager()
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, m.selectRoutes([]route.NetID{"exitA"}, true))
|
|
|
|
err := m.selectRoutes(ids, true)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err, "unknown id must be reported")
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitB"), "valid exit node from the request is selected")
|
|
assert.False(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitA"), "sibling exit node must be deselected despite the error")
|
|
assert.False(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitA-v6"), "sibling's v6 pair must be deselected too")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSelectAllRoutes_KeepsSingleExitNode(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Both exit nodes are marked for auto-apply by management
|
|
// (SkipAutoApply=false), the state where select-all could turn on two at
|
|
// once without the immediate reconciliation.
|
|
m := &DefaultManager{
|
|
routeSelector: routeselector.NewRouteSelector(),
|
|
clientRoutes: route.HAMap{
|
|
"exitA|0.0.0.0/0": {exitRoute("exitA", "p1", false)},
|
|
"exitB|0.0.0.0/0": {exitRoute("exitB", "p2", false)},
|
|
"lan|192.168.1.0/24": {{NetID: "lan", Network: netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.1.0/24"), Peer: "p3"}},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, m.selectRoutes([]route.NetID{"exitB"}, true))
|
|
|
|
m.selectAllRoutes()
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("lan"), "non-exit routes are all selected")
|
|
assert.True(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitA"), "the deterministic management pick stays active")
|
|
assert.False(t, m.routeSelector.IsSelected("exitB"), "select-all must not leave a second exit node active")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSelectRoutes_UnknownRoute(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m := newSelectionTestManager()
|
|
|
|
assert.Error(t, m.selectRoutes([]route.NetID{"missing"}, true), "selecting an unavailable route must fail")
|
|
assert.Error(t, m.deselectRoutes([]route.NetID{"missing"}), "deselecting an unavailable route must fail")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestExitNodeSelectionHelpers(t *testing.T) {
|
|
routesMap := map[route.NetID][]*route.Route{
|
|
"exitA": {{Network: netip.MustParsePrefix("0.0.0.0/0")}},
|
|
"exitB": {{Network: netip.MustParsePrefix("::/0")}},
|
|
"lan": {{Network: netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/16")}},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, requestActivatesExitNode([]route.NetID{"exitA"}, routesMap), "v4 default route is an exit node")
|
|
assert.True(t, requestActivatesExitNode([]route.NetID{"exitB"}, routesMap), "v6 default route is an exit node")
|
|
assert.False(t, requestActivatesExitNode([]route.NetID{"lan"}, routesMap), "lan route is not an exit node")
|
|
assert.False(t, requestActivatesExitNode([]route.NetID{"missing"}, routesMap), "unknown id is not an exit node")
|
|
|
|
others := otherExitNodeIDs(routesMap, []route.NetID{"exitB"})
|
|
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []route.NetID{"exitA"}, others, "only the other exit node is a sibling; the lan route is ignored")
|
|
}
|