Files
netbird/management/internals/modules/agentnetwork/policyselect_model_test.go
mlsmaycon 66e48bc933 agentnetwork: scope model allowlist per policy/group and provider
The model-allowlist guardrail was merged into one account-wide union
and enforced flat on every request, independent of which policy,
group, or provider actually authorised it. With multiple policies —
especially a mix of guardrailed and un-guardrailed ones — this
produced two defects:

  - false-allow: a model allowlisted for one group/provider leaked to
    any caller, because the flat union ignored which policy authorised
    the request; and
  - false-deny: a policy with no guardrail (intended unrestricted) had
    its traffic blocked by an unrelated policy's allowlist.

Make enforcement policy/group-aware, mirroring how llm_limit_check
already resolves caps:

  - Management (SelectPolicyForRequest) is authoritative. It now uses
    the request model (already carried on the wire in
    CheckLLMPolicyLimitsRequest.model, previously ignored) to keep only
    the applicable policies whose guardrails permit the model; a policy
    with no allowlist-enabled guardrail is unrestricted. When policies
    govern the (provider, groups) but none permits the model it denies
    with llm_policy.model_blocked. No proto change — the field already
    existed and the proxy already sends it.

  - The proxy llm_guardrail becomes a per-provider fail-closed backstop.
    The synthesiser emits a per-provider allowlist only when every
    policy authorising that provider restricts models; a provider
    reachable by any un-guardrailed policy is omitted (unrestricted).
    The middleware keys the allowlist by the resolved provider id and
    keeps the unknown/undetermined-model fail-closed behaviour so
    path-routed providers stay enforced when management is unreachable.

Unit tests cover the selector gate (block, allow, cross-group no-leak,
un-guardrailed policy unrestricted, undetermined-model fail-closed) and
the per-provider synthesis; an e2e proves all three properties end to
end over the tunnel. Docs updated for the new config shape and the
two-layer enforcement.
2026-07-26 10:51:07 +00:00

227 lines
9.0 KiB
Go

package agentnetwork
import (
"context"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/golang/mock/gomock"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/internals/modules/agentnetwork/types"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/store"
)
// guardedPolicy builds an enabled, uncapped policy that authorises sourceGroups
// to reach providerID under the given guardrails. Uncapped keeps the selector's
// headroom scoring trivial so these tests isolate the model-allowlist gate.
func guardedPolicy(id, account string, sourceGroups []string, providerID string, guardrailIDs ...string) *types.Policy {
return &types.Policy{
ID: id,
AccountID: account,
Enabled: true,
SourceGroups: sourceGroups,
DestinationProviderIDs: []string{providerID},
GuardrailIDs: guardrailIDs,
CreatedAt: time.Now().UTC(),
}
}
// allowlistGuardrail builds a guardrail whose model allowlist is enabled and
// carries the given models.
func allowlistGuardrail(id, account string, models ...string) *types.Guardrail {
return &types.Guardrail{
ID: id,
AccountID: account,
Checks: types.GuardrailChecks{
ModelAllowlist: types.GuardrailModelAllowlist{Enabled: true, Models: models},
},
}
}
func expectPolicies(mockStore *store.MockStore, account string, policies ...*types.Policy) {
mockStore.EXPECT().
GetAccountAgentNetworkPolicies(gomock.Any(), gomock.Any(), account).
Return(policies, nil)
}
func expectGuardrails(mockStore *store.MockStore, account string, guardrails ...*types.Guardrail) {
mockStore.EXPECT().
GetAccountAgentNetworkGuardrails(gomock.Any(), gomock.Any(), account).
Return(guardrails, nil)
}
// TestSelectPolicy_ModelBlockedByAllowlist proves the authoritative allowlist
// decision: a policy authorises the (provider, group) but restricts the model,
// and the requested model isn't on the list, so the request is denied.
func TestSelectPolicy_ModelBlockedByAllowlist(t *testing.T) {
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
mgr, mockStore := newSelectorMgr(t, ctrl)
policy := guardedPolicy("pol-A", "acc-1", []string{"grp-eng"}, "prov-1", "g-1")
expectPolicies(mockStore, "acc-1", policy)
expectGuardrails(mockStore, "acc-1", allowlistGuardrail("g-1", "acc-1", "gpt-4o"))
res, err := mgr.SelectPolicyForRequest(context.Background(), PolicySelectionInput{
AccountID: "acc-1",
UserID: "user-1",
GroupIDs: []string{"grp-eng"},
ProviderID: "prov-1",
Model: "claude-opus-4",
})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, res.Allow, "a model outside the only applicable policy's allowlist must be denied")
assert.Equal(t, denyCodeModelBlocked, res.DenyCode, "deny code must be model_blocked")
assert.NotEmpty(t, res.DenyReason, "deny reason must be populated")
}
// TestSelectPolicy_ModelAllowedByAllowlist is the allow counterpart: the model
// is on the applicable policy's allowlist, so selection proceeds normally.
func TestSelectPolicy_ModelAllowedByAllowlist(t *testing.T) {
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
mgr, mockStore := newSelectorMgr(t, ctrl)
policy := guardedPolicy("pol-A", "acc-1", []string{"grp-eng"}, "prov-1", "g-1")
expectPolicies(mockStore, "acc-1", policy)
expectGuardrails(mockStore, "acc-1", allowlistGuardrail("g-1", "acc-1", "gpt-4o", "claude-opus-4"))
expectConsumptionBatch(mockStore, nil)
res, err := mgr.SelectPolicyForRequest(context.Background(), PolicySelectionInput{
AccountID: "acc-1",
UserID: "user-1",
GroupIDs: []string{"grp-eng"},
ProviderID: "prov-1",
Model: "claude-opus-4",
})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, res.Allow, "a model on the applicable policy's allowlist must be allowed")
assert.Equal(t, "pol-A", res.SelectedPolicyID)
}
// TestSelectPolicy_CaseInsensitiveModelMatch proves the compare tolerates case
// and surrounding whitespace, matching the proxy guardrail's normalisation.
func TestSelectPolicy_CaseInsensitiveModelMatch(t *testing.T) {
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
mgr, mockStore := newSelectorMgr(t, ctrl)
policy := guardedPolicy("pol-A", "acc-1", []string{"grp-eng"}, "prov-1", "g-1")
expectPolicies(mockStore, "acc-1", policy)
expectGuardrails(mockStore, "acc-1", allowlistGuardrail("g-1", "acc-1", " GPT-4o "))
expectConsumptionBatch(mockStore, nil)
res, err := mgr.SelectPolicyForRequest(context.Background(), PolicySelectionInput{
AccountID: "acc-1",
GroupIDs: []string{"grp-eng"},
ProviderID: "prov-1",
Model: "gpt-4o",
})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, res.Allow, "case/whitespace variants must match the allowlist entry")
}
// TestSelectPolicy_UnguardedPolicyIsUnrestricted is the false-deny fix: when
// two policies authorise the same (provider, group) and one carries no
// guardrail, that un-guardrailed policy makes the request unrestricted — it is
// NOT caught by the other policy's allowlist.
func TestSelectPolicy_UnguardedPolicyIsUnrestricted(t *testing.T) {
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
mgr, mockStore := newSelectorMgr(t, ctrl)
restricted := guardedPolicy("pol-restricted", "acc-1", []string{"grp-eng"}, "prov-1", "g-1")
open := guardedPolicy("pol-open", "acc-1", []string{"grp-eng"}, "prov-1") // no guardrail
expectPolicies(mockStore, "acc-1", restricted, open)
expectGuardrails(mockStore, "acc-1", allowlistGuardrail("g-1", "acc-1", "gpt-4o"))
expectConsumptionBatch(mockStore, nil)
res, err := mgr.SelectPolicyForRequest(context.Background(), PolicySelectionInput{
AccountID: "acc-1",
GroupIDs: []string{"grp-eng"},
ProviderID: "prov-1",
Model: "claude-opus-4",
})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, res.Allow, "an un-guardrailed policy for the same (provider, group) must leave the request unrestricted")
assert.Equal(t, "pol-open", res.SelectedPolicyID, "the unrestricted policy must be the one that pays")
}
// TestSelectPolicy_AllowlistDoesNotLeakAcrossGroups is the false-allow fix: a
// model allowlisted only for grp-b must not be usable by a caller in grp-a,
// even though both groups' policies target the same provider. The selector only
// considers policies applicable to the caller's groups, so grp-b's allowlist
// never enters grp-a's decision.
func TestSelectPolicy_AllowlistDoesNotLeakAcrossGroups(t *testing.T) {
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
mgr, mockStore := newSelectorMgr(t, ctrl)
polA := guardedPolicy("pol-a", "acc-1", []string{"grp-a"}, "prov-1", "g-a")
polB := guardedPolicy("pol-b", "acc-1", []string{"grp-b"}, "prov-1", "g-b")
expectPolicies(mockStore, "acc-1", polA, polB)
expectGuardrails(mockStore, "acc-1",
allowlistGuardrail("g-a", "acc-1", "gpt-4o"),
allowlistGuardrail("g-b", "acc-1", "claude-opus-4"),
)
res, err := mgr.SelectPolicyForRequest(context.Background(), PolicySelectionInput{
AccountID: "acc-1",
GroupIDs: []string{"grp-a"},
ProviderID: "prov-1",
Model: "claude-opus-4", // only allowed for grp-b
})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, res.Allow, "grp-b's allowlisted model must not leak to a grp-a caller")
assert.Equal(t, denyCodeModelBlocked, res.DenyCode)
}
// TestSelectPolicy_UndeterminedModelFailsClosed proves the fail-closed contract
// mirrors the proxy: with a restricted applicable policy and an empty model
// (e.g. a path-routed shape the parser couldn't map), the request is denied.
func TestSelectPolicy_UndeterminedModelFailsClosed(t *testing.T) {
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
mgr, mockStore := newSelectorMgr(t, ctrl)
policy := guardedPolicy("pol-A", "acc-1", []string{"grp-eng"}, "prov-1", "g-1")
expectPolicies(mockStore, "acc-1", policy)
expectGuardrails(mockStore, "acc-1", allowlistGuardrail("g-1", "acc-1", "gpt-4o"))
res, err := mgr.SelectPolicyForRequest(context.Background(), PolicySelectionInput{
AccountID: "acc-1",
GroupIDs: []string{"grp-eng"},
ProviderID: "prov-1",
Model: "", // undetermined
})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.False(t, res.Allow, "an undetermined model must fail closed against a restricted policy")
assert.Equal(t, denyCodeModelBlocked, res.DenyCode)
}
// TestSelectPolicy_DisabledAllowlistDoesNotRestrict proves a guardrail whose
// model allowlist is disabled imposes no model restriction, even though the
// policy references it.
func TestSelectPolicy_DisabledAllowlistDoesNotRestrict(t *testing.T) {
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
mgr, mockStore := newSelectorMgr(t, ctrl)
policy := guardedPolicy("pol-A", "acc-1", []string{"grp-eng"}, "prov-1", "g-1")
disabled := &types.Guardrail{
ID: "g-1",
AccountID: "acc-1",
Checks: types.GuardrailChecks{
ModelAllowlist: types.GuardrailModelAllowlist{Enabled: false, Models: []string{"gpt-4o"}},
},
}
expectPolicies(mockStore, "acc-1", policy)
expectGuardrails(mockStore, "acc-1", disabled)
expectConsumptionBatch(mockStore, nil)
res, err := mgr.SelectPolicyForRequest(context.Background(), PolicySelectionInput{
AccountID: "acc-1",
GroupIDs: []string{"grp-eng"},
ProviderID: "prov-1",
Model: "anything-goes",
})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, res.Allow, "a disabled allowlist must not restrict the model")
assert.Equal(t, "pol-A", res.SelectedPolicyID)
}