minor changes

management/server/policy.go

@@ -46,33 +46,51 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) SavePolicy(ctx context.Context, accountID, user
 	var isUpdate = policy.ID != ""
 	var updateAccountPeers bool
 	var action = activity.PolicyAdded
+	var unchanged bool
 
 	err = am.Store.ExecuteInTransaction(ctx, func(transaction store.Store) error {
-		if err = validatePolicy(ctx, transaction, accountID, policy); err != nil {
+		existingPolicy, err := validatePolicy(ctx, transaction, accountID, policy)
-			return err
-		}
-
-		updateAccountPeers, err = arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx, transaction, accountID, policy, isUpdate)
 		if err != nil {
 			return err
 		}
 
-		saveFunc := transaction.CreatePolicy
 		if isUpdate {
-			action = activity.PolicyUpdated
+			if policy.Equal(existingPolicy) {
-			saveFunc = transaction.SavePolicy
+				unchanged = true
+				return nil
 			}
 
-		if err = saveFunc(ctx, policy); err != nil {
+			action = activity.PolicyUpdated
+
+			updateAccountPeers, err = arePolicyChangesAffectPeersWithExisting(ctx, transaction, policy, existingPolicy)
+			if err != nil {
 				return err
 			}
 
+			if err = transaction.SavePolicy(ctx, policy); err != nil {
+				return err
+			}
+		} else {
+			updateAccountPeers, err = arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx, transaction, policy)
+			if err != nil {
+				return err
+			}
+
+			if err = transaction.CreatePolicy(ctx, policy); err != nil {
+				return err
+			}
+		}
+
 		return transaction.IncrementNetworkSerial(ctx, accountID)
 	})
 	if err != nil {
 		return nil, err
 	}
 
+	if unchanged {
+		return policy, nil
+	}
+
 	am.StoreEvent(ctx, userID, policy.ID, accountID, action, policy.EventMeta())
 
 	if updateAccountPeers {
@@ -101,7 +119,7 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) DeletePolicy(ctx context.Context, accountID, po
 			return err
 		}
 
-		updateAccountPeers, err = arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx, transaction, accountID, policy, false)
+		updateAccountPeers, err = arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx, transaction, policy)
 		if err != nil {
 			return err
 		}
@@ -138,14 +156,18 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) ListPolicies(ctx context.Context, accountID, us
 	return am.Store.GetAccountPolicies(ctx, store.LockingStrengthNone, accountID)
 }
 
-// arePolicyChangesAffectPeers checks if changes to a policy will affect any associated peers.
+// arePolicyChangesAffectPeers checks if a policy (being created or deleted) will affect any associated peers.
-func arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID string, policy *types.Policy, isUpdate bool) (bool, error) {
+func arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, policy *types.Policy) (bool, error) {
-	if isUpdate {
+	for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
-		existingPolicy, err := transaction.GetPolicyByID(ctx, store.LockingStrengthNone, accountID, policy.ID)
+		if rule.SourceResource.Type != "" || rule.DestinationResource.Type != "" {
-		if err != nil {
+			return true, nil
-			return false, err
+		}
 	}
 
+	return anyGroupHasPeersOrResources(ctx, transaction, policy.AccountID, policy.RuleGroups())
+}
+
+func arePolicyChangesAffectPeersWithExisting(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, policy *types.Policy, existingPolicy *types.Policy) (bool, error) {
 	if !policy.Enabled && !existingPolicy.Enabled {
 		return false, nil
 	}
@@ -164,7 +186,6 @@ func arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, a
 	if hasPeers {
 		return true, nil
 	}
-	}
 
 	for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
 		if rule.SourceResource.Type != "" || rule.DestinationResource.Type != "" {
@@ -175,12 +196,15 @@ func arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, a
 	return anyGroupHasPeersOrResources(ctx, transaction, policy.AccountID, policy.RuleGroups())
 }
 
-// validatePolicy validates the policy and its rules.
+// validatePolicy validates the policy and its rules. For updates it returns
-func validatePolicy(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID string, policy *types.Policy) error {
+// the existing policy loaded from the store so callers can avoid a second read.
+func validatePolicy(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID string, policy *types.Policy) (*types.Policy, error) {
+	var existingPolicy *types.Policy
 	if policy.ID != "" {
-		existingPolicy, err := transaction.GetPolicyByID(ctx, store.LockingStrengthNone, accountID, policy.ID)
+		var err error
+		existingPolicy, err = transaction.GetPolicyByID(ctx, store.LockingStrengthNone, accountID, policy.ID)
 		if err != nil {
-			return err
+			return nil, err
 		}
 
 		// TODO: Refactor to support multiple rules per policy
@@ -191,7 +215,7 @@ func validatePolicy(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID stri
 
 		for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
 			if rule.ID != "" && !existingRuleIDs[rule.ID] {
-				return status.Errorf(status.InvalidArgument, "invalid rule ID: %s", rule.ID)
+				return nil, status.Errorf(status.InvalidArgument, "invalid rule ID: %s", rule.ID)
 			}
 		}
 	} else {
@@ -201,12 +225,12 @@ func validatePolicy(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID stri
 
 	groups, err := transaction.GetGroupsByIDs(ctx, store.LockingStrengthNone, accountID, policy.RuleGroups())
 	if err != nil {
-		return err
+		return nil, err
 	}
 
 	postureChecks, err := transaction.GetPostureChecksByIDs(ctx, store.LockingStrengthNone, accountID, policy.SourcePostureChecks)
 	if err != nil {
-		return err
+		return nil, err
 	}
 
 	for i, rule := range policy.Rules {
@@ -225,7 +249,7 @@ func validatePolicy(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID stri
 		policy.SourcePostureChecks = getValidPostureCheckIDs(postureChecks, policy.SourcePostureChecks)
 	}
 
-	return nil
+	return existingPolicy, nil
 }
 
 // getValidPostureCheckIDs filters and returns only the valid posture check IDs from the provided list.

management/server/types/policy.go

@@ -93,6 +93,44 @@ func (p *Policy) Copy() *Policy {
 	return c
 }
 
+func (p *Policy) Equal(other *Policy) bool {
+	if p == nil || other == nil {
+		return p == other
+	}
+
+	if p.ID != other.ID ||
+		p.AccountID != other.AccountID ||
+		p.Name != other.Name ||
+		p.Description != other.Description ||
+		p.Enabled != other.Enabled {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	if !stringSlicesEqualUnordered(p.SourcePostureChecks, other.SourcePostureChecks) {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	if len(p.Rules) != len(other.Rules) {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	otherRules := make(map[string]*PolicyRule, len(other.Rules))
+	for _, r := range other.Rules {
+		otherRules[r.ID] = r
+	}
+	for _, r := range p.Rules {
+		otherRule, ok := otherRules[r.ID]
+		if !ok {
+			return false
+		}
+		if !r.Equal(otherRule) {
+			return false
+		}
+	}
+
+	return true
+}
+
 // EventMeta returns activity event meta related to this policy
 func (p *Policy) EventMeta() map[string]any {
 	return map[string]any{"name": p.Name}

management/server/types/policy_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+package types
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+)
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_SameRulesDifferentOrder(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &Policy{
+		ID:        "pol1",
+		AccountID: "acc1",
+		Name:      "test",
+		Enabled:   true,
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{ID: "r1", PolicyID: "pol1", Ports: []string{"80"}},
+			{ID: "r2", PolicyID: "pol1", Ports: []string{"443"}},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &Policy{
+		ID:        "pol1",
+		AccountID: "acc1",
+		Name:      "test",
+		Enabled:   true,
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{ID: "r2", PolicyID: "pol1", Ports: []string{"443"}},
+			{ID: "r1", PolicyID: "pol1", Ports: []string{"80"}},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_DifferentRules(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &Policy{
+		ID:      "pol1",
+		Enabled: true,
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{ID: "r1", PolicyID: "pol1", Ports: []string{"80"}},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &Policy{
+		ID:      "pol1",
+		Enabled: true,
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{ID: "r1", PolicyID: "pol1", Ports: []string{"443"}},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_DifferentRuleCount(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &Policy{
+		ID: "pol1",
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{ID: "r1", PolicyID: "pol1"},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &Policy{
+		ID: "pol1",
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{ID: "r1", PolicyID: "pol1"},
+			{ID: "r2", PolicyID: "pol1"},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_PostureChecksDifferentOrder(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &Policy{
+		ID:                  "pol1",
+		SourcePostureChecks: []string{"pc3", "pc1", "pc2"},
+	}
+	b := &Policy{
+		ID:                  "pol1",
+		SourcePostureChecks: []string{"pc1", "pc2", "pc3"},
+	}
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_DifferentPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &Policy{
+		ID:                  "pol1",
+		SourcePostureChecks: []string{"pc1", "pc2"},
+	}
+	b := &Policy{
+		ID:                  "pol1",
+		SourcePostureChecks: []string{"pc1", "pc3"},
+	}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_DifferentScalarFields(t *testing.T) {
+	base := Policy{
+		ID:          "pol1",
+		AccountID:   "acc1",
+		Name:        "test",
+		Description: "desc",
+		Enabled:     true,
+	}
+
+	other := base
+	other.Name = "changed"
+	assert.False(t, base.Equal(&other))
+
+	other = base
+	other.Enabled = false
+	assert.False(t, base.Equal(&other))
+
+	other = base
+	other.Description = "changed"
+	assert.False(t, base.Equal(&other))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_NilCases(t *testing.T) {
+	var a *Policy
+	var b *Policy
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+
+	a = &Policy{ID: "pol1"}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(nil))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_RulesMismatchByID(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &Policy{
+		ID: "pol1",
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{ID: "r1", PolicyID: "pol1"},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &Policy{
+		ID: "pol1",
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{ID: "r2", PolicyID: "pol1"},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyEqual_FullScenario(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &Policy{
+		ID:                  "pol1",
+		AccountID:           "acc1",
+		Name:                "Web Access",
+		Description:         "Allow web access",
+		Enabled:             true,
+		SourcePostureChecks: []string{"pc2", "pc1"},
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{
+				ID:            "r1",
+				PolicyID:      "pol1",
+				Name:          "HTTP",
+				Enabled:       true,
+				Action:        PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
+				Protocol:      PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
+				Bidirectional: true,
+				Sources:       []string{"g2", "g1"},
+				Destinations:  []string{"g4", "g3"},
+				Ports:         []string{"443", "80", "8080"},
+				PortRanges: []RulePortRange{
+					{Start: 8000, End: 9000},
+					{Start: 80, End: 80},
+				},
+			},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &Policy{
+		ID:                  "pol1",
+		AccountID:           "acc1",
+		Name:                "Web Access",
+		Description:         "Allow web access",
+		Enabled:             true,
+		SourcePostureChecks: []string{"pc1", "pc2"},
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{
+				ID:            "r1",
+				PolicyID:      "pol1",
+				Name:          "HTTP",
+				Enabled:       true,
+				Action:        PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
+				Protocol:      PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
+				Bidirectional: true,
+				Sources:       []string{"g1", "g2"},
+				Destinations:  []string{"g3", "g4"},
+				Ports:         []string{"80", "8080", "443"},
+				PortRanges: []RulePortRange{
+					{Start: 80, End: 80},
+					{Start: 8000, End: 9000},
+				},
+			},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+}

management/server/types/policyrule.go

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 package types
 
 import (
+	"slices"
+
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/shared/management/proto"
 )
 
@@ -118,3 +120,106 @@ func (pm *PolicyRule) Copy() *PolicyRule {
 	}
 	return rule
 }
+
+func (pm *PolicyRule) Equal(other *PolicyRule) bool {
+	if pm == nil || other == nil {
+		return pm == other
+	}
+
+	if pm.ID != other.ID ||
+		pm.PolicyID != other.PolicyID ||
+		pm.Name != other.Name ||
+		pm.Description != other.Description ||
+		pm.Enabled != other.Enabled ||
+		pm.Action != other.Action ||
+		pm.Bidirectional != other.Bidirectional ||
+		pm.Protocol != other.Protocol ||
+		pm.SourceResource != other.SourceResource ||
+		pm.DestinationResource != other.DestinationResource ||
+		pm.AuthorizedUser != other.AuthorizedUser {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	if !stringSlicesEqualUnordered(pm.Sources, other.Sources) {
+		return false
+	}
+	if !stringSlicesEqualUnordered(pm.Destinations, other.Destinations) {
+		return false
+	}
+	if !stringSlicesEqualUnordered(pm.Ports, other.Ports) {
+		return false
+	}
+	if !portRangeSlicesEqualUnordered(pm.PortRanges, other.PortRanges) {
+		return false
+	}
+	if !authorizedGroupsEqual(pm.AuthorizedGroups, other.AuthorizedGroups) {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	return true
+}
+
+func stringSlicesEqualUnordered(a, b []string) bool {
+	if len(a) != len(b) {
+		return false
+	}
+	if len(a) == 0 {
+		return true
+	}
+	sorted1 := make([]string, len(a))
+	sorted2 := make([]string, len(b))
+	copy(sorted1, a)
+	copy(sorted2, b)
+	slices.Sort(sorted1)
+	slices.Sort(sorted2)
+	return slices.Equal(sorted1, sorted2)
+}
+
+func portRangeSlicesEqualUnordered(a, b []RulePortRange) bool {
+	if len(a) != len(b) {
+		return false
+	}
+	if len(a) == 0 {
+		return true
+	}
+	cmp := func(x, y RulePortRange) int {
+		if x.Start != y.Start {
+			if x.Start < y.Start {
+				return -1
+			}
+			return 1
+		}
+		if x.End != y.End {
+			if x.End < y.End {
+				return -1
+			}
+			return 1
+		}
+		return 0
+	}
+	sorted1 := make([]RulePortRange, len(a))
+	sorted2 := make([]RulePortRange, len(b))
+	copy(sorted1, a)
+	copy(sorted2, b)
+	slices.SortFunc(sorted1, cmp)
+	slices.SortFunc(sorted2, cmp)
+	return slices.EqualFunc(sorted1, sorted2, func(x, y RulePortRange) bool {
+		return x.Start == y.Start && x.End == y.End
+	})
+}
+
+func authorizedGroupsEqual(a, b map[string][]string) bool {
+	if len(a) != len(b) {
+		return false
+	}
+	for k, va := range a {
+		vb, ok := b[k]
+		if !ok {
+			return false
+		}
+		if !stringSlicesEqualUnordered(va, vb) {
+			return false
+		}
+	}
+	return true
+}

management/server/types/policyrule_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+package types
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+)
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_SamePortsDifferentOrder(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		Ports:    []string{"443", "80", "22"},
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		Ports:    []string{"22", "443", "80"},
+	}
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_DifferentPorts(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		Ports:    []string{"443", "80"},
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		Ports:    []string{"443", "22"},
+	}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_SourcesDestinationsDifferentOrder(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:           "rule1",
+		PolicyID:     "pol1",
+		Sources:      []string{"g1", "g2", "g3"},
+		Destinations: []string{"g4", "g5"},
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:           "rule1",
+		PolicyID:     "pol1",
+		Sources:      []string{"g3", "g1", "g2"},
+		Destinations: []string{"g5", "g4"},
+	}
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_DifferentSources(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		Sources:  []string{"g1", "g2"},
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		Sources:  []string{"g1", "g3"},
+	}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_PortRangesDifferentOrder(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		PortRanges: []RulePortRange{
+			{Start: 8000, End: 9000},
+			{Start: 80, End: 80},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		PortRanges: []RulePortRange{
+			{Start: 80, End: 80},
+			{Start: 8000, End: 9000},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_DifferentPortRanges(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		PortRanges: []RulePortRange{
+			{Start: 80, End: 80},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		PortRanges: []RulePortRange{
+			{Start: 80, End: 443},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_AuthorizedGroupsDifferentValueOrder(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		AuthorizedGroups: map[string][]string{
+			"g1": {"u1", "u2", "u3"},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		AuthorizedGroups: map[string][]string{
+			"g1": {"u3", "u1", "u2"},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_DifferentAuthorizedGroups(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		AuthorizedGroups: map[string][]string{
+			"g1": {"u1"},
+		},
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		AuthorizedGroups: map[string][]string{
+			"g2": {"u1"},
+		},
+	}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_DifferentScalarFields(t *testing.T) {
+	base := PolicyRule{
+		ID:            "rule1",
+		PolicyID:      "pol1",
+		Name:          "test",
+		Description:   "desc",
+		Enabled:       true,
+		Action:        PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
+		Bidirectional: true,
+		Protocol:      PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
+	}
+
+	other := base
+	other.Name = "changed"
+	assert.False(t, base.Equal(&other))
+
+	other = base
+	other.Enabled = false
+	assert.False(t, base.Equal(&other))
+
+	other = base
+	other.Action = PolicyTrafficActionDrop
+	assert.False(t, base.Equal(&other))
+
+	other = base
+	other.Protocol = PolicyRuleProtocolUDP
+	assert.False(t, base.Equal(&other))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_NilCases(t *testing.T) {
+	var a *PolicyRule
+	var b *PolicyRule
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+
+	a = &PolicyRule{ID: "rule1"}
+	assert.False(t, a.Equal(nil))
+}
+
+func TestPolicyRuleEqual_EmptySlices(t *testing.T) {
+	a := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		Ports:    []string{},
+		Sources:  nil,
+	}
+	b := &PolicyRule{
+		ID:       "rule1",
+		PolicyID: "pol1",
+		Ports:    nil,
+		Sources:  []string{},
+	}
+	assert.True(t, a.Equal(b))
+}
+