[management] Fix policy tests (#3135)

- Add firewall rule isEqual method
- Fix tests

.github/workflows/golangci-lint.yml

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ jobs:
       - name: codespell
         uses: codespell-project/actions-codespell@v2
         with:
-          ignore_words_list: erro,clienta,hastable,iif,groupd
+          ignore_words_list: erro,clienta,hastable,iif,groupd,testin
           skip: go.mod,go.sum
           only_warn: 1
   golangci:

client/firewall/iptables/manager_linux.go

@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ func (m *Manager) AllowNetbird() error {
 	}
 
 	_, err := m.AddPeerFiltering(
-		net.ParseIP("0.0.0.0"),
+		net.IP{0, 0, 0, 0},
 		"all",
 		nil,
 		nil,

client/internal/dns/handler_chain.go

@@ -68,17 +68,16 @@ func (c *HandlerChain) AddHandler(pattern string, handler dns.Handler, priority
 	c.mu.Lock()
 	defer c.mu.Unlock()
 
+	pattern = strings.ToLower(dns.Fqdn(pattern))
 	origPattern := pattern
 	isWildcard := strings.HasPrefix(pattern, "*.")
 	if isWildcard {
 		pattern = pattern[2:]
 	}
-	pattern = dns.Fqdn(pattern)
-	origPattern = dns.Fqdn(origPattern)
 
-	// First remove any existing handler with same original pattern and priority
+	// First remove any existing handler with same pattern (case-insensitive) and priority
 	for i := len(c.handlers) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
-		if c.handlers[i].OrigPattern == origPattern && c.handlers[i].Priority == priority {
+		if strings.EqualFold(c.handlers[i].OrigPattern, origPattern) && c.handlers[i].Priority == priority {
 			if c.handlers[i].StopHandler != nil {
 				c.handlers[i].StopHandler.stop()
 			}
@@ -126,10 +125,10 @@ func (c *HandlerChain) RemoveHandler(pattern string, priority int) {
 
 	pattern = dns.Fqdn(pattern)
 
-	// Find and remove handlers matching both original pattern and priority
+	// Find and remove handlers matching both original pattern (case-insensitive) and priority
 	for i := len(c.handlers) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
 		entry := c.handlers[i]
-		if entry.OrigPattern == pattern && entry.Priority == priority {
+		if strings.EqualFold(entry.OrigPattern, pattern) && entry.Priority == priority {
 			if entry.StopHandler != nil {
 				entry.StopHandler.stop()
 			}
@@ -144,9 +143,9 @@ func (c *HandlerChain) HasHandlers(pattern string) bool {
 	c.mu.RLock()
 	defer c.mu.RUnlock()
 
-	pattern = dns.Fqdn(pattern)
+	pattern = strings.ToLower(dns.Fqdn(pattern))
 	for _, entry := range c.handlers {
-		if entry.Pattern == pattern {
+		if strings.EqualFold(entry.Pattern, pattern) {
 			return true
 		}
 	}
@@ -158,7 +157,7 @@ func (c *HandlerChain) ServeDNS(w dns.ResponseWriter, r *dns.Msg) {
 		return
 	}
 
-	qname := r.Question[0].Name
+	qname := strings.ToLower(r.Question[0].Name)
 	log.Tracef("handling DNS request for domain=%s", qname)
 
 	c.mu.RLock()
@@ -187,9 +186,9 @@ func (c *HandlerChain) ServeDNS(w dns.ResponseWriter, r *dns.Msg) {
 			// If handler wants subdomain matching, allow suffix match
 			// Otherwise require exact match
 			if entry.MatchSubdomains {
-				matched = qname == entry.Pattern || strings.HasSuffix(qname, "."+entry.Pattern)
+				matched = strings.EqualFold(qname, entry.Pattern) || strings.HasSuffix(qname, "."+entry.Pattern)
 			} else {
-				matched = qname == entry.Pattern
+				matched = strings.EqualFold(qname, entry.Pattern)
 			}
 		}
 

client/internal/dns/handler_chain_test.go

@@ -507,5 +507,173 @@ func TestHandlerChain_MultiPriorityHandling(t *testing.T) {
 
 	// Test 4: Remove last handler
 	chain.RemoveHandler(testDomain, nbdns.PriorityDefault)
+
 	assert.False(t, chain.HasHandlers(testDomain))
 }
+
+func TestHandlerChain_CaseSensitivity(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name        string
+		scenario    string
+		addHandlers []struct {
+			pattern     string
+			priority    int
+			subdomains  bool
+			shouldMatch bool
+		}
+		query         string
+		expectedCalls int
+	}{
+		{
+			name:     "case insensitive exact match",
+			scenario: "handler registered lowercase, query uppercase",
+			addHandlers: []struct {
+				pattern     string
+				priority    int
+				subdomains  bool
+				shouldMatch bool
+			}{
+				{"example.com.", nbdns.PriorityDefault, false, true},
+			},
+			query:         "EXAMPLE.COM.",
+			expectedCalls: 1,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "case insensitive wildcard match",
+			scenario: "handler registered mixed case wildcard, query different case",
+			addHandlers: []struct {
+				pattern     string
+				priority    int
+				subdomains  bool
+				shouldMatch bool
+			}{
+				{"*.Example.Com.", nbdns.PriorityDefault, false, true},
+			},
+			query:         "sub.EXAMPLE.COM.",
+			expectedCalls: 1,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "multiple handlers different case same domain",
+			scenario: "second handler should replace first despite case difference",
+			addHandlers: []struct {
+				pattern     string
+				priority    int
+				subdomains  bool
+				shouldMatch bool
+			}{
+				{"EXAMPLE.COM.", nbdns.PriorityDefault, false, false},
+				{"example.com.", nbdns.PriorityDefault, false, true},
+			},
+			query:         "ExAmPlE.cOm.",
+			expectedCalls: 1,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "subdomain matching case insensitive",
+			scenario: "handler with MatchSubdomains true should match regardless of case",
+			addHandlers: []struct {
+				pattern     string
+				priority    int
+				subdomains  bool
+				shouldMatch bool
+			}{
+				{"example.com.", nbdns.PriorityDefault, true, true},
+			},
+			query:         "SUB.EXAMPLE.COM.",
+			expectedCalls: 1,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "root zone case insensitive",
+			scenario: "root zone handler should match regardless of case",
+			addHandlers: []struct {
+				pattern     string
+				priority    int
+				subdomains  bool
+				shouldMatch bool
+			}{
+				{".", nbdns.PriorityDefault, false, true},
+			},
+			query:         "EXAMPLE.COM.",
+			expectedCalls: 1,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "multiple handlers different priority",
+			scenario: "should call higher priority handler despite case differences",
+			addHandlers: []struct {
+				pattern     string
+				priority    int
+				subdomains  bool
+				shouldMatch bool
+			}{
+				{"EXAMPLE.COM.", nbdns.PriorityDefault, false, false},
+				{"example.com.", nbdns.PriorityMatchDomain, false, false},
+				{"Example.Com.", nbdns.PriorityDNSRoute, false, true},
+			},
+			query:         "example.com.",
+			expectedCalls: 1,
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			chain := nbdns.NewHandlerChain()
+			handlerCalls := make(map[string]bool) // track which patterns were called
+
+			// Add handlers according to test case
+			for _, h := range tt.addHandlers {
+				var handler dns.Handler
+				pattern := h.pattern // capture pattern for closure
+
+				if h.subdomains {
+					subHandler := &nbdns.MockSubdomainHandler{
+						Subdomains: true,
+					}
+					if h.shouldMatch {
+						subHandler.On("ServeDNS", mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Run(func(args mock.Arguments) {
+							handlerCalls[pattern] = true
+							w := args.Get(0).(dns.ResponseWriter)
+							r := args.Get(1).(*dns.Msg)
+							resp := new(dns.Msg)
+							resp.SetRcode(r, dns.RcodeSuccess)
+							assert.NoError(t, w.WriteMsg(resp))
+						}).Once()
+					}
+					handler = subHandler
+				} else {
+					mockHandler := &nbdns.MockHandler{}
+					if h.shouldMatch {
+						mockHandler.On("ServeDNS", mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Run(func(args mock.Arguments) {
+							handlerCalls[pattern] = true
+							w := args.Get(0).(dns.ResponseWriter)
+							r := args.Get(1).(*dns.Msg)
+							resp := new(dns.Msg)
+							resp.SetRcode(r, dns.RcodeSuccess)
+							assert.NoError(t, w.WriteMsg(resp))
+						}).Once()
+					}
+					handler = mockHandler
+				}
+
+				chain.AddHandler(pattern, handler, h.priority, nil)
+			}
+
+			// Execute request
+			r := new(dns.Msg)
+			r.SetQuestion(tt.query, dns.TypeA)
+			chain.ServeDNS(&mockResponseWriter{}, r)
+
+			// Verify each handler was called exactly as expected
+			for _, h := range tt.addHandlers {
+				wasCalled := handlerCalls[h.pattern]
+				assert.Equal(t, h.shouldMatch, wasCalled,
+					"Handler for pattern %q was %s when it should%s have been",
+					h.pattern,
+					map[bool]string{true: "called", false: "not called"}[wasCalled],
+					map[bool]string{true: "", false: " not"}[wasCalled == h.shouldMatch])
+			}
+
+			// Verify total number of calls
+			assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedCalls, len(handlerCalls),
+				"Wrong number of total handler calls")
+		})
+	}
+}

client/internal/dnsfwd/manager.go

@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ func (h *Manager) allowDNSFirewall() error {
 		IsRange: false,
 		Values:  []int{ListenPort},
 	}
-	dnsRules, err := h.firewall.AddPeerFiltering(net.ParseIP("0.0.0.0"), firewall.ProtocolUDP, nil, dport, firewall.RuleDirectionIN, firewall.ActionAccept, "", "")
+	dnsRules, err := h.firewall.AddPeerFiltering(net.IP{0, 0, 0, 0}, firewall.ProtocolUDP, nil, dport, firewall.RuleDirectionIN, firewall.ActionAccept, "", "")
 	if err != nil {
 		log.Errorf("failed to add allow DNS router rules, err: %v", err)
 		return err

client/internal/engine.go

@@ -406,13 +406,9 @@ func (e *Engine) Start() error {
 	e.firewall, err = firewall.NewFirewall(e.wgInterface, e.stateManager)
 	if err != nil {
 		log.Errorf("failed creating firewall manager: %s", err)
-	}
+	} else if e.firewall != nil {
-
+		if err := e.initFirewall(err); err != nil {
-	if e.firewall != nil && e.firewall.IsServerRouteSupported() {
+			return err
-		err = e.routeManager.EnableServerRouter(e.firewall)
-		if err != nil {
-			e.close()
-			return fmt.Errorf("enable server router: %w", err)
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -455,6 +451,41 @@ func (e *Engine) Start() error {
 	return nil
 }
 
+func (e *Engine) initFirewall(error) error {
+	if e.firewall.IsServerRouteSupported() {
+		if err := e.routeManager.EnableServerRouter(e.firewall); err != nil {
+			e.close()
+			return fmt.Errorf("enable server router: %w", err)
+		}
+	}
+
+	if e.rpManager == nil || !e.config.RosenpassEnabled {
+		return nil
+	}
+
+	rosenpassPort := e.rpManager.GetAddress().Port
+	port := manager.Port{Values: []int{rosenpassPort}}
+
+	// this rule is static and will be torn down on engine down by the firewall manager
+	if _, err := e.firewall.AddPeerFiltering(
+		net.IP{0, 0, 0, 0},
+		manager.ProtocolUDP,
+		nil,
+		&port,
+		manager.RuleDirectionIN,
+		manager.ActionAccept,
+		"",
+		"",
+	); err != nil {
+		log.Errorf("failed to allow rosenpass interface traffic: %v", err)
+		return nil
+	}
+
+	log.Infof("rosenpass interface traffic allowed on port %d", rosenpassPort)
+
+	return nil
+}
+
 // modifyPeers updates peers that have been modified (e.g. IP address has been changed).
 // It closes the existing connection, removes it from the peerConns map, and creates a new one.
 func (e *Engine) modifyPeers(peersUpdate []*mgmProto.RemotePeerConfig) error {

management/server/account.go

@@ -1252,6 +1252,12 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) GetAccountIDFromToken(ctx context.Context, clai
 // syncJWTGroups processes the JWT groups for a user, updates the account based on the groups,
 // and propagates changes to peers if group propagation is enabled.
 func (am *DefaultAccountManager) syncJWTGroups(ctx context.Context, accountID string, claims jwtclaims.AuthorizationClaims) error {
+	if claim, exists := claims.Raw[jwtclaims.IsToken]; exists {
+		if isToken, ok := claim.(bool); ok && isToken {
+			return nil
+		}
+	}
+
 	settings, err := am.Store.GetAccountSettings(ctx, store.LockingStrengthShare, accountID)
 	if err != nil {
 		return err

management/server/account_test.go

@@ -2729,6 +2729,19 @@ func TestAccount_SetJWTGroups(t *testing.T) {
 
 	assert.NoError(t, manager.Store.SaveAccount(context.Background(), account), "unable to save account")
 
+	t.Run("skip sync for token auth type", func(t *testing.T) {
+		claims := jwtclaims.AuthorizationClaims{
+			UserId: "user1",
+			Raw:    jwt.MapClaims{"groups": []interface{}{"group3"}, "is_token": true},
+		}
+		err = manager.syncJWTGroups(context.Background(), "accountID", claims)
+		assert.NoError(t, err, "unable to sync jwt groups")
+
+		user, err := manager.Store.GetUserByUserID(context.Background(), store.LockingStrengthShare, "user1")
+		assert.NoError(t, err, "unable to get user")
+		assert.Len(t, user.AutoGroups, 0, "JWT groups should not be synced")
+	})
+
 	t.Run("empty jwt groups", func(t *testing.T) {
 		claims := jwtclaims.AuthorizationClaims{
 			UserId: "user1",
@@ -2822,7 +2835,7 @@ func TestAccount_SetJWTGroups(t *testing.T) {
 		assert.Len(t, user.AutoGroups, 1, "new group should be added")
 	})
 
-	t.Run("remove all JWT groups", func(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Run("remove all JWT groups when list is empty", func(t *testing.T) {
 		claims := jwtclaims.AuthorizationClaims{
 			UserId: "user1",
 			Raw:    jwt.MapClaims{"groups": []interface{}{}},
@@ -2833,7 +2846,20 @@ func TestAccount_SetJWTGroups(t *testing.T) {
 		user, err := manager.Store.GetUserByUserID(context.Background(), store.LockingStrengthShare, "user1")
 		assert.NoError(t, err, "unable to get user")
 		assert.Len(t, user.AutoGroups, 1, "only non-JWT groups should remain")
-		assert.Contains(t, user.AutoGroups, "group1", " group1 should still be present")
+		assert.Contains(t, user.AutoGroups, "group1", "group1 should still be present")
+	})
+
+	t.Run("remove all JWT groups when claim does not exist", func(t *testing.T) {
+		claims := jwtclaims.AuthorizationClaims{
+			UserId: "user2",
+			Raw:    jwt.MapClaims{},
+		}
+		err = manager.syncJWTGroups(context.Background(), "accountID", claims)
+		assert.NoError(t, err, "unable to sync jwt groups")
+
+		user, err := manager.Store.GetUserByUserID(context.Background(), store.LockingStrengthShare, "user2")
+		assert.NoError(t, err, "unable to get user")
+		assert.Len(t, user.AutoGroups, 0, "all JWT groups should be removed")
 	})
 }
 
@@ -3037,9 +3063,9 @@ func BenchmarkSyncAndMarkPeer(b *testing.B) {
 		minMsPerOpCICD  float64
 		maxMsPerOpCICD  float64
 	}{
-		{"Small", 50, 5, 1, 3, 3, 10},
+		{"Small", 50, 5, 1, 3, 3, 11},
 		{"Medium", 500, 100, 7, 13, 10, 70},
-		{"Large", 5000, 200, 65, 80, 60, 200},
+		{"Large", 5000, 200, 65, 80, 60, 220},
 		{"Small single", 50, 10, 1, 3, 3, 70},
 		{"Medium single", 500, 10, 7, 13, 10, 26},
 		{"Large 5", 5000, 15, 65, 80, 60, 200},
@@ -3179,7 +3205,7 @@ func BenchmarkLoginPeer_NewPeer(b *testing.B) {
 		maxMsPerOpCICD  float64
 	}{
 		{"Small", 50, 5, 107, 120, 107, 160},
-		{"Medium", 500, 100, 105, 140, 105, 190},
+		{"Medium", 500, 100, 105, 140, 105, 220},
 		{"Large", 5000, 200, 180, 220, 180, 350},
 		{"Small single", 50, 10, 107, 120, 105, 160},
 		{"Medium single", 500, 10, 105, 140, 105, 170},

management/server/http/middleware/auth_middleware.go

@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ func (m *AuthMiddleware) checkPATFromRequest(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Requ
 	claimMaps[m.audience+jwtclaims.AccountIDSuffix] = account.Id
 	claimMaps[m.audience+jwtclaims.DomainIDSuffix] = account.Domain
 	claimMaps[m.audience+jwtclaims.DomainCategorySuffix] = account.DomainCategory
+	claimMaps[jwtclaims.IsToken] = true
 	jwtToken := jwt.NewWithClaims(jwt.SigningMethodHS256, claimMaps)
 	newRequest := r.WithContext(context.WithValue(r.Context(), jwtclaims.TokenUserProperty, jwtToken)) //nolint
 	// Update the current request with the new context information.

management/server/jwtclaims/extractor.go

@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ const (
 	LastLoginSuffix = "nb_last_login"
 	// Invited claim indicates that an incoming JWT is from a user that just accepted an invitation
 	Invited = "nb_invited"
+	// IsToken claim indicates that auth type from the user is a token
+	IsToken = "is_token"
 )
 
 // ExtractClaims Extract function type

management/server/metrics/selfhosted.go

@@ -195,6 +195,10 @@ func (w *Worker) generateProperties(ctx context.Context) properties {
 		groups                    int
 		routes                    int
 		routesWithRGGroups        int
+		networks                  int
+		networkResources          int
+		networkRouters            int
+		networkRoutersWithPG      int
 		nameservers               int
 		uiClient                  int
 		version                   string
@@ -219,6 +223,16 @@ func (w *Worker) generateProperties(ctx context.Context) properties {
 		}
 
 		groups += len(account.Groups)
+		networks += len(account.Networks)
+		networkResources += len(account.NetworkResources)
+
+		networkRouters += len(account.NetworkRouters)
+		for _, router := range account.NetworkRouters {
+			if len(router.PeerGroups) > 0 {
+				networkRoutersWithPG++
+			}
+		}
+
 		routes += len(account.Routes)
 		for _, route := range account.Routes {
 			if len(route.PeerGroups) > 0 {
@@ -312,6 +326,10 @@ func (w *Worker) generateProperties(ctx context.Context) properties {
 	metricsProperties["rules_with_src_posture_checks"] = rulesWithSrcPostureChecks
 	metricsProperties["posture_checks"] = postureChecks
 	metricsProperties["groups"] = groups
+	metricsProperties["networks"] = networks
+	metricsProperties["network_resources"] = networkResources
+	metricsProperties["network_routers"] = networkRouters
+	metricsProperties["network_routers_with_groups"] = networkRoutersWithPG
 	metricsProperties["routes"] = routes
 	metricsProperties["routes_with_routing_groups"] = routesWithRGGroups
 	metricsProperties["nameservers"] = nameservers

management/server/metrics/selfhosted_test.go

@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ import (
 	"testing"
 
 	nbdns "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/dns"
+	resourceTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/resources/types"
+	routerTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/routers/types"
+	networkTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/types"
 	nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/posture"
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/store"
@@ -172,6 +175,31 @@ func (mockDatasource) GetAllAccounts(_ context.Context) []*types.Account {
 					},
 				},
 			},
+			Networks: []*networkTypes.Network{
+				{
+					ID:        "1",
+					AccountID: "1",
+				},
+			},
+			NetworkResources: []*resourceTypes.NetworkResource{
+				{
+					ID:        "1",
+					AccountID: "1",
+					NetworkID: "1",
+				},
+				{
+					ID:        "2",
+					AccountID: "1",
+					NetworkID: "1",
+				},
+			},
+			NetworkRouters: []*routerTypes.NetworkRouter{
+				{
+					ID:        "1",
+					AccountID: "1",
+					NetworkID: "1",
+				},
+			},
 		},
 	}
 }
@@ -200,6 +228,15 @@ func TestGenerateProperties(t *testing.T) {
 	if properties["routes"] != 2 {
 		t.Errorf("expected 2 routes, got %d", properties["routes"])
 	}
+	if properties["networks"] != 1 {
+		t.Errorf("expected 1 networks, got %d", properties["networks"])
+	}
+	if properties["network_resources"] != 2 {
+		t.Errorf("expected 2 network_resources, got %d", properties["network_resources"])
+	}
+	if properties["network_routers"] != 1 {
+		t.Errorf("expected 1 network_routers, got %d", properties["network_routers"])
+	}
 	if properties["rules"] != 4 {
 		t.Errorf("expected 4 rules, got %d", properties["rules"])
 	}

management/server/networks/resources/types/resource.go

@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ func (n *NetworkResource) ToRoute(peer *nbpeer.Peer, router *routerTypes.Network
 		NetID:               route.NetID(n.Name),
 		Description:         n.Description,
 		Peer:                peer.Key,
+		PeerID:              peer.ID,
 		PeerGroups:          nil,
 		Masquerade:          router.Masquerade,
 		Metric:              router.Metric,

management/server/peer_test.go

@@ -932,11 +932,11 @@ func BenchmarkUpdateAccountPeers(b *testing.B) {
 	}{
 		{"Small", 50, 5, 90, 120, 90, 120},
 		{"Medium", 500, 100, 110, 150, 120, 260},
-		{"Large", 5000, 200, 800, 1390, 2500, 4600},
+		{"Large", 5000, 200, 800, 1700, 2500, 5000},
 		{"Small single", 50, 10, 90, 120, 90, 120},
 		{"Medium single", 500, 10, 110, 170, 120, 200},
-		{"Large 5", 5000, 15, 1300, 2100, 5000, 7000},
+		{"Large 5", 5000, 15, 1300, 2100, 4900, 7000},
-		{"Extra Large", 2000, 2000, 1300, 2100, 4000, 6000},
+		{"Extra Large", 2000, 2000, 1300, 2400, 4000, 6400},
 	}
 
 	log.SetOutput(io.Discard)

management/server/policy_test.go

@@ -74,6 +74,19 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 					"peerH",
 				},
 			},
+			"GroupWorkstations": {
+				ID:   "GroupWorkstations",
+				Name: "GroupWorkstations",
+				Peers: []string{
+					"peerB",
+					"peerA",
+					"peerD",
+					"peerE",
+					"peerF",
+					"peerG",
+					"peerH",
+				},
+			},
 			"GroupSwarm": {
 				ID:   "GroupSwarm",
 				Name: "swarm",
@@ -127,7 +140,7 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 						Action:        types.PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
 						Sources: []string{
 							"GroupSwarm",
-							"GroupAll",
+							"GroupWorkstations",
 						},
 						Destinations: []string{
 							"GroupSwarm",
@@ -159,6 +172,8 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerE"])
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
+		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerG"])
+		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerH"])
 
 		epectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
 			{
@@ -189,21 +204,6 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 				Protocol:  "all",
 				Port:      "",
 			},
-			{
-				PeerIP:    "100.65.254.139",
-				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionOUT,
-				Action:    "accept",
-				Protocol:  "all",
-				Port:      "",
-			},
-			{
-				PeerIP:    "100.65.254.139",
-				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionIN,
-				Action:    "accept",
-				Protocol:  "all",
-				Port:      "",
-			},
-
 			{
 				PeerIP:    "100.65.62.5",
 				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionOUT,
@@ -280,10 +280,16 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 		}
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
-		slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
+
-		slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
+		for _, rule := range firewallRules {
-		for i := range firewallRules {
+			contains := false
-			assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
+			for _, expectedRule := range epectedFirewallRules {
+				if rule.IsEqual(expectedRule) {
+					contains = true
+					break
+				}
+			}
+			assert.True(t, contains, "rule not found in expected rules %#v", rule)
 		}
 	})
 }

management/server/route.go

@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ func toProtocolRoute(route *route.Route) *proto.Route {
 }
 
 func toProtocolRoutes(routes []*route.Route) []*proto.Route {
-	protoRoutes := make([]*proto.Route, 0)
+	protoRoutes := make([]*proto.Route, 0, len(routes))
 	for _, r := range routes {
 		protoRoutes = append(protoRoutes, toProtocolRoute(r))
 	}

management/server/types/account.go

@@ -303,55 +303,47 @@ func (a *Account) GetPeerNetworkMap(
 	return nm
 }
 
-func (a *Account) addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes []*route.Route, peer *nbpeer.Peer, peersToConnect []*nbpeer.Peer, expiredPeers []*nbpeer.Peer, isRouter bool, sourcePeers []string) []*nbpeer.Peer {
+func (a *Account) addNetworksRoutingPeers(
-	missingPeers := map[string]struct{}{}
+	networkResourcesRoutes []*route.Route,
-	for _, r := range networkResourcesRoutes {
+	peer *nbpeer.Peer,
-		if r.Peer == peer.Key {
+	peersToConnect []*nbpeer.Peer,
-			continue
+	expiredPeers []*nbpeer.Peer,
-		}
+	isRouter bool,
+	sourcePeers map[string]struct{},
+) []*nbpeer.Peer {
 
-		missing := true
+	networkRoutesPeers := make(map[string]struct{}, len(networkResourcesRoutes))
-		for _, p := range slices.Concat(peersToConnect, expiredPeers) {
+	for _, r := range networkResourcesRoutes {
-			if r.Peer == p.Key {
+		networkRoutesPeers[r.PeerID] = struct{}{}
-				missing = false
-				break
-			}
-		}
-		if missing {
-			missingPeers[r.Peer] = struct{}{}
-		}
 	}
 
-	if isRouter {
+	delete(sourcePeers, peer.ID)
-		for _, s := range sourcePeers {
-			if s == peer.ID {
-				continue
-			}
 
-			missing := true
+	for _, existingPeer := range peersToConnect {
-			for _, p := range slices.Concat(peersToConnect, expiredPeers) {
+		delete(sourcePeers, existingPeer.ID)
-				if s == p.ID {
+		delete(networkRoutesPeers, existingPeer.ID)
-					missing = false
+	}
-					break
+	for _, expPeer := range expiredPeers {
-				}
+		delete(sourcePeers, expPeer.ID)
-			}
+		delete(networkRoutesPeers, expPeer.ID)
-			if missing {
+	}
-				p, ok := a.Peers[s]
+
-				if ok {
+	missingPeers := make(map[string]struct{}, len(sourcePeers)+len(networkRoutesPeers))
-					missingPeers[p.Key] = struct{}{}
+	if isRouter {
-				}
+		for p := range sourcePeers {
-			}
+			missingPeers[p] = struct{}{}
 		}
 	}
+	for p := range networkRoutesPeers {
+		missingPeers[p] = struct{}{}
+	}
 
 	for p := range missingPeers {
-		for _, p2 := range a.Peers {
+		if missingPeer := a.Peers[p]; missingPeer != nil {
-			if p2.Key == p {
+			peersToConnect = append(peersToConnect, missingPeer)
-				peersToConnect = append(peersToConnect, p2)
-				break
-			}
 		}
 	}
+
 	return peersToConnect
 }
 
@@ -1045,37 +1037,32 @@ func (a *Account) connResourcesGenerator(ctx context.Context) (func(*PolicyRule,
 // for destination group peers, call this method with an empty list of sourcePostureChecksIDs
 func (a *Account) getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx context.Context, groups []string, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) ([]*nbpeer.Peer, bool) {
 	peerInGroups := false
-	filteredPeers := make([]*nbpeer.Peer, 0, len(groups))
+	uniquePeerIDs := a.getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(ctx, groups)
-	for _, g := range groups {
+	filteredPeers := make([]*nbpeer.Peer, 0, len(uniquePeerIDs))
-		group, ok := a.Groups[g]
+	for _, p := range uniquePeerIDs {
-		if !ok {
+		peer, ok := a.Peers[p]
+		if !ok || peer == nil {
 			continue
 		}
 
-		for _, p := range group.Peers {
+		// validate the peer based on policy posture checks applied
-			peer, ok := a.Peers[p]
+		isValid := a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(ctx, sourcePostureChecksIDs, peer.ID)
-			if !ok || peer == nil {
+		if !isValid {
-				continue
+			continue
-			}
-
-			// validate the peer based on policy posture checks applied
-			isValid := a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(ctx, sourcePostureChecksIDs, peer.ID)
-			if !isValid {
-				continue
-			}
-
-			if _, ok := validatedPeersMap[peer.ID]; !ok {
-				continue
-			}
-
-			if peer.ID == peerID {
-				peerInGroups = true
-				continue
-			}
-
-			filteredPeers = append(filteredPeers, peer)
 		}
+
+		if _, ok := validatedPeersMap[peer.ID]; !ok {
+			continue
+		}
+
+		if peer.ID == peerID {
+			peerInGroups = true
+			continue
+		}
+
+		filteredPeers = append(filteredPeers, peer)
 	}
+
 	return filteredPeers, peerInGroups
 }
 
@@ -1151,7 +1138,7 @@ func (a *Account) getRouteFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, peerID string, poli
 				continue
 			}
 
-			rulePeers := a.getRulePeers(rule, peerID, distributionPeers, validatedPeersMap)
+			rulePeers := a.getRulePeers(rule, policy.SourcePostureChecks, peerID, distributionPeers, validatedPeersMap)
 			rules := generateRouteFirewallRules(ctx, route, rule, rulePeers, FirewallRuleDirectionIN)
 			fwRules = append(fwRules, rules...)
 		}
@@ -1159,7 +1146,7 @@ func (a *Account) getRouteFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, peerID string, poli
 	return fwRules
 }
 
-func (a *Account) getRulePeers(rule *PolicyRule, peerID string, distributionPeers map[string]struct{}, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) []*nbpeer.Peer {
+func (a *Account) getRulePeers(rule *PolicyRule, postureChecks []string, peerID string, distributionPeers map[string]struct{}, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) []*nbpeer.Peer {
 	distPeersWithPolicy := make(map[string]struct{})
 	for _, id := range rule.Sources {
 		group := a.Groups[id]
@@ -1173,7 +1160,7 @@ func (a *Account) getRulePeers(rule *PolicyRule, peerID string, distributionPeer
 			}
 			_, distPeer := distributionPeers[pID]
 			_, valid := validatedPeersMap[pID]
-			if distPeer && valid {
+			if distPeer && valid && a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(context.Background(), postureChecks, pID) {
 				distPeersWithPolicy[pID] = struct{}{}
 			}
 		}
@@ -1271,7 +1258,11 @@ func (a *Account) GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, peer
 		distributionPeers := getPoliciesSourcePeers(resourceAppliedPolicies, a.Groups)
 
 		rules := a.getRouteFirewallRules(ctx, peer.ID, resourceAppliedPolicies, route, validatedPeersMap, distributionPeers)
-		routesFirewallRules = append(routesFirewallRules, rules...)
+		for _, rule := range rules {
+			if len(rule.SourceRanges) > 0 {
+				routesFirewallRules = append(routesFirewallRules, rule)
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
 	return routesFirewallRules
@@ -1303,10 +1294,10 @@ func (a *Account) GetResourcePoliciesMap() map[string][]*Policy {
 }
 
 // GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync returns network routes for syncing with a specific peer and its ACL peers.
-func (a *Account) GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(ctx context.Context, peerID string, resourcePolicies map[string][]*Policy, routers map[string]map[string]*routerTypes.NetworkRouter) (bool, []*route.Route, []string) {
+func (a *Account) GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(ctx context.Context, peerID string, resourcePolicies map[string][]*Policy, routers map[string]map[string]*routerTypes.NetworkRouter) (bool, []*route.Route, map[string]struct{}) {
 	var isRoutingPeer bool
 	var routes []*route.Route
-	var allSourcePeers []string
+	allSourcePeers := make(map[string]struct{}, len(a.Peers))
 
 	for _, resource := range a.NetworkResources {
 		var addSourcePeers bool
@@ -1319,23 +1310,22 @@ func (a *Account) GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(ctx context.Context, peerID st
 			}
 		}
 
+		addedResourceRoute := false
 		for _, policy := range resourcePolicies[resource.ID] {
-			for _, sourceGroup := range policy.SourceGroups() {
+			peers := a.getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(ctx, policy.SourceGroups())
-				group := a.GetGroup(sourceGroup)
+			if addSourcePeers {
-				if group == nil {
+				for _, pID := range a.getPostureValidPeers(peers, policy.SourcePostureChecks) {
-					log.WithContext(ctx).Warnf("policy %s has source group %s that doesn't exist under account %s, will continue map generation without it", policy.ID, sourceGroup, a.Id)
+					allSourcePeers[pID] = struct{}{}
-					continue
 				}
-
+			} else if slices.Contains(peers, peerID) && a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(ctx, policy.SourcePostureChecks, peerID) {
-				// routing peer should be able to connect with all source peers
+				// add routes for the resource if the peer is in the distribution group
-				if addSourcePeers {
+				for peerId, router := range networkRoutingPeers {
-					allSourcePeers = append(allSourcePeers, group.Peers...)
+					routes = append(routes, a.getNetworkResourcesRoutes(resource, peerId, router, resourcePolicies)...)
-				} else if slices.Contains(group.Peers, peerID) {
-					// add routes for the resource if the peer is in the distribution group
-					for peerId, router := range networkRoutingPeers {
-						routes = append(routes, a.getNetworkResourcesRoutes(resource, peerId, router, resourcePolicies)...)
-					}
 				}
+				addedResourceRoute = true
+			}
+			if addedResourceRoute {
+				break
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -1343,6 +1333,42 @@ func (a *Account) GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(ctx context.Context, peerID st
 	return isRoutingPeer, routes, allSourcePeers
 }
 
+func (a *Account) getPostureValidPeers(inputPeers []string, postureChecksIDs []string) []string {
+	var dest []string
+	for _, peerID := range inputPeers {
+		if a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(context.Background(), postureChecksIDs, peerID) {
+			dest = append(dest, peerID)
+		}
+	}
+	return dest
+}
+
+func (a *Account) getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(ctx context.Context, groups []string) []string {
+	peerIDs := make(map[string]struct{}, len(groups)) // we expect at least one peer per group as initial capacity
+	for _, groupID := range groups {
+		group := a.GetGroup(groupID)
+		if group == nil {
+			log.WithContext(ctx).Warnf("group %s doesn't exist under account %s, will continue map generation without it", groupID, a.Id)
+			continue
+		}
+
+		if group.IsGroupAll() || len(groups) == 1 {
+			return group.Peers
+		}
+
+		for _, peerID := range group.Peers {
+			peerIDs[peerID] = struct{}{}
+		}
+	}
+
+	ids := make([]string, 0, len(peerIDs))
+	for peerID := range peerIDs {
+		ids = append(ids, peerID)
+	}
+
+	return ids
+}
+
 // getNetworkResources filters and returns a list of network resources associated with the given network ID.
 func (a *Account) getNetworkResources(networkID string) []*resourceTypes.NetworkResource {
 	var resources []*resourceTypes.NetworkResource

management/server/types/account_test.go

@@ -1,14 +1,20 @@
 package types
 
 import (
+	"context"
+	"net"
+	"net/netip"
+	"slices"
 	"testing"
 
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
 
 	resourceTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/resources/types"
 	routerTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/routers/types"
 	networkTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/types"
 	nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
+	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/posture"
 	"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/route"
 )
 
@@ -310,19 +316,19 @@ func Test_GetResourcePoliciesMap(t *testing.T) {
 
 func Test_AddNetworksRoutingPeersAddsMissingPeers(t *testing.T) {
 	account := setupTestAccount()
-	peer := &nbpeer.Peer{Key: "peer1"}
+	peer := &nbpeer.Peer{Key: "peer1Key", ID: "peer1"}
 	networkResourcesRoutes := []*route.Route{
-		{Peer: "peer2Key"},
+		{Peer: "peer2Key", PeerID: "peer2"},
-		{Peer: "peer3Key"},
+		{Peer: "peer3Key", PeerID: "peer3"},
 	}
 	peersToConnect := []*nbpeer.Peer{
-		{Key: "peer2Key"},
+		{Key: "peer2Key", ID: "peer2"},
 	}
 	expiredPeers := []*nbpeer.Peer{
-		{Key: "peer4Key"},
+		{Key: "peer4Key", ID: "peer4"},
 	}
 
-	result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, []string{})
+	result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, map[string]struct{}{})
 	require.Len(t, result, 2)
 	require.Equal(t, "peer2Key", result[0].Key)
 	require.Equal(t, "peer3Key", result[1].Key)
@@ -339,7 +345,7 @@ func Test_AddNetworksRoutingPeersIgnoresExistingPeers(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 	expiredPeers := []*nbpeer.Peer{}
 
-	result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, []string{})
+	result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, map[string]struct{}{})
 	require.Len(t, result, 1)
 	require.Equal(t, "peer2Key", result[0].Key)
 }
@@ -358,7 +364,7 @@ func Test_AddNetworksRoutingPeersAddsExpiredPeers(t *testing.T) {
 		{Key: "peer3Key"},
 	}
 
-	result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, []string{})
+	result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, map[string]struct{}{})
 	require.Len(t, result, 1)
 	require.Equal(t, "peer2Key", result[0].Key)
 }
@@ -370,6 +376,382 @@ func Test_AddNetworksRoutingPeersHandlesNoMissingPeers(t *testing.T) {
 	peersToConnect := []*nbpeer.Peer{}
 	expiredPeers := []*nbpeer.Peer{}
 
-	result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, []string{})
+	result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, map[string]struct{}{})
 	require.Len(t, result, 0)
 }
+
+const (
+	accID                                = "accountID"
+	network1ID                           = "network1ID"
+	group1ID                             = "group1"
+	accNetResourcePeer1ID                = "peer1"
+	accNetResourcePeer2ID                = "peer2"
+	accNetResourceRouter1ID              = "router1"
+	accNetResource1ID                    = "resource1ID"
+	accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID = "restrictPostureCheck"
+	accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID  = "relaxedPostureCheck"
+	accNetResourceLockedPostureCheckID   = "lockedPostureCheck"
+	accNetResourceLinuxPostureCheckID    = "linuxPostureCheck"
+)
+
+var (
+	accNetResourcePeer1IP    = net.IP{192, 168, 1, 1}
+	accNetResourcePeer2IP    = net.IP{192, 168, 1, 2}
+	accNetResourceRouter1IP  = net.IP{192, 168, 1, 3}
+	accNetResourceValidPeers = map[string]struct{}{accNetResourcePeer1ID: {}, accNetResourcePeer2ID: {}}
+)
+
+func getBasicAccountsWithResource() *Account {
+	return &Account{
+		Id: accID,
+		Peers: map[string]*nbpeer.Peer{
+			accNetResourcePeer1ID: {
+				ID:        accNetResourcePeer1ID,
+				AccountID: accID,
+				Key:       "peer1Key",
+				IP:        accNetResourcePeer1IP,
+				Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
+					GoOS:          "linux",
+					WtVersion:     "0.35.1",
+					KernelVersion: "4.4.0",
+				},
+			},
+			accNetResourcePeer2ID: {
+				ID:        accNetResourcePeer2ID,
+				AccountID: accID,
+				Key:       "peer2Key",
+				IP:        accNetResourcePeer2IP,
+				Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
+					GoOS:          "windows",
+					WtVersion:     "0.34.1",
+					KernelVersion: "4.4.0",
+				},
+			},
+			accNetResourceRouter1ID: {
+				ID:        accNetResourceRouter1ID,
+				AccountID: accID,
+				Key:       "router1Key",
+				IP:        accNetResourceRouter1IP,
+				Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
+					GoOS:          "linux",
+					WtVersion:     "0.35.1",
+					KernelVersion: "4.4.0",
+				},
+			},
+		},
+		Groups: map[string]*Group{
+			group1ID: {
+				ID:    group1ID,
+				Peers: []string{accNetResourcePeer1ID, accNetResourcePeer2ID},
+			},
+		},
+		Networks: []*networkTypes.Network{
+			{
+				ID:        network1ID,
+				AccountID: accID,
+				Name:      "network1",
+			},
+		},
+		NetworkRouters: []*routerTypes.NetworkRouter{
+			{
+				ID:         accNetResourceRouter1ID,
+				NetworkID:  network1ID,
+				AccountID:  accID,
+				Peer:       accNetResourceRouter1ID,
+				PeerGroups: []string{},
+				Masquerade: false,
+				Metric:     100,
+			},
+		},
+		NetworkResources: []*resourceTypes.NetworkResource{
+			{
+				ID:        accNetResource1ID,
+				AccountID: accID,
+				NetworkID: network1ID,
+				Address:   "10.10.10.0/24",
+				Prefix:    netip.MustParsePrefix("10.10.10.0/24"),
+				Type:      resourceTypes.NetworkResourceType("subnet"),
+			},
+		},
+		Policies: []*Policy{
+			{
+				ID:        "policy1ID",
+				AccountID: accID,
+				Enabled:   true,
+				Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+					{
+						ID:      "rule1ID",
+						Enabled: true,
+						Sources: []string{group1ID},
+						DestinationResource: Resource{
+							ID:   accNetResource1ID,
+							Type: "Host",
+						},
+						Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
+						Ports:    []string{"80"},
+						Action:   PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
+					},
+				},
+				SourcePostureChecks: nil,
+			},
+		},
+		PostureChecks: []*posture.Checks{
+			{
+				ID:   accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID,
+				Name: accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID,
+				Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
+					NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{
+						MinVersion: "0.35.0",
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			{
+				ID:   accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID,
+				Name: accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID,
+				Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
+					NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{
+						MinVersion: "0.0.1",
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			{
+				ID:   accNetResourceLockedPostureCheckID,
+				Name: accNetResourceLockedPostureCheckID,
+				Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
+					NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{
+						MinVersion: "7.7.7",
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			{
+				ID:   accNetResourceLinuxPostureCheckID,
+				Name: accNetResourceLinuxPostureCheckID,
+				Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
+					OSVersionCheck: &posture.OSVersionCheck{
+						Linux: &posture.MinKernelVersionCheck{
+							MinKernelVersion: "0.0.0"},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+		},
+	}
+}
+
+func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithNoPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
+	account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
+
+	// all peers should match the policy
+
+	// validate for peer1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate for peer2
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate routes for router1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 2, "expected source peers don't match")
+	assert.NotNil(t, sourcePeers[accNetResourcePeer1ID], "expected source peers don't match")
+	assert.NotNil(t, sourcePeers[accNetResourcePeer2ID], "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate rules for router1
+	rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
+	assert.Len(t, rules, 1, "expected rules count don't match")
+	assert.Equal(t, uint16(80), rules[0].Port, "should have port 80")
+	assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[0].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
+	if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
+	}
+	if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer2 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
+	}
+}
+
+func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
+	account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
+
+	// should allow peer1 to match the policy
+	policy := account.Policies[0]
+	policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID}
+
+	// validate for peer1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate for peer2
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 0, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate routes for router1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 1, "expected source peers don't match")
+	assert.NotNil(t, sourcePeers[accNetResourcePeer1ID], "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate rules for router1
+	rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
+	assert.Len(t, rules, 1, "expected rules count don't match")
+	assert.Equal(t, uint16(80), rules[0].Port, "should have port 80")
+	assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[0].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
+	if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
+	}
+	if slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should not have source range of peer2 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
+	}
+}
+
+func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithNoMatchedPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
+	account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
+
+	// should not match any peer
+	policy := account.Policies[0]
+	policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{accNetResourceLockedPostureCheckID}
+
+	// validate for peer1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 0, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate for peer2
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 0, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate routes for router1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate rules for router1
+	rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
+	assert.Len(t, rules, 0, "expected rules count don't match")
+}
+
+func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithTwoPoliciesAndPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
+	account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
+
+	// should allow peer1 to match the policy
+	policy := account.Policies[0]
+	policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID}
+
+	// should allow peer1 and peer2 to match the policy
+	newPolicy := &Policy{
+		ID:        "policy2ID",
+		AccountID: accID,
+		Enabled:   true,
+		Rules: []*PolicyRule{
+			{
+				ID:      "policy2ID",
+				Enabled: true,
+				Sources: []string{group1ID},
+				DestinationResource: Resource{
+					ID:   accNetResource1ID,
+					Type: "Host",
+				},
+				Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
+				Ports:    []string{"22"},
+				Action:   PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
+			},
+		},
+		SourcePostureChecks: []string{accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID},
+	}
+
+	account.Policies = append(account.Policies, newPolicy)
+
+	// validate for peer1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate for peer2
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate routes for router1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 2, "expected source peers don't match")
+	assert.NotNil(t, sourcePeers[accNetResourcePeer1ID], "expected source peers don't match")
+	assert.NotNil(t, sourcePeers[accNetResourcePeer2ID], "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate rules for router1
+	rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
+	assert.Len(t, rules, 2, "expected rules count don't match")
+	assert.Equal(t, uint16(80), rules[0].Port, "should have port 80")
+	assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[0].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
+	if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
+	}
+	if slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should not have source range of peer2 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
+	}
+
+	assert.Equal(t, uint16(22), rules[1].Port, "should have port 22")
+	assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[1].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
+	if !slices.Contains(rules[1].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[1].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
+	}
+	if !slices.Contains(rules[1].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer2 %s", rules[1].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
+	}
+}
+
+func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithTwoPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
+	account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
+
+	// two posture checks should match only the peers that match both checks
+	policy := account.Policies[0]
+	policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID, accNetResourceLinuxPostureCheckID}
+
+	// validate for peer1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate for peer2
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 0, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate routes for router1
+	isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
+	assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
+	assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
+	assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 1, "expected source peers don't match")
+	assert.NotNil(t, sourcePeers[accNetResourcePeer1ID], "expected source peers don't match")
+
+	// validate rules for router1
+	rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
+	assert.Len(t, rules, 1, "expected rules count don't match")
+	assert.Equal(t, uint16(80), rules[0].Port, "should have port 80")
+	assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[0].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
+	if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
+	}
+	if slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
+		t.Errorf("%s should not have source range of peer2 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
+	}
+}

management/server/types/firewall_rule.go

@@ -35,6 +35,15 @@ type FirewallRule struct {
 	Port string
 }
 
+// IsEqual checks if two firewall rules are equal.
+func (r *FirewallRule) IsEqual(other *FirewallRule) bool {
+	return r.PeerIP == other.PeerIP &&
+		r.Direction == other.Direction &&
+		r.Action == other.Action &&
+		r.Protocol == other.Protocol &&
+		r.Port == other.Port
+}
+
 // generateRouteFirewallRules generates a list of firewall rules for a given route.
 func generateRouteFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, route *nbroute.Route, rule *PolicyRule, groupPeers []*nbpeer.Peer, direction int) []*RouteFirewallRule {
 	rulesExists := make(map[string]struct{})

management/server/types/policy.go

@@ -117,9 +117,20 @@ func (p *Policy) RuleGroups() []string {
 
 // SourceGroups returns a slice of all unique source groups referenced in the policy's rules.
 func (p *Policy) SourceGroups() []string {
-	groups := make([]string, 0)
+	if len(p.Rules) == 1 {
-	for _, rule := range p.Rules {
+		return p.Rules[0].Sources
-		groups = append(groups, rule.Sources...)
 	}
-	return groups
+	groups := make(map[string]struct{}, len(p.Rules))
+	for _, rule := range p.Rules {
+		for _, source := range rule.Sources {
+			groups[source] = struct{}{}
+		}
+	}
+
+	groupIDs := make([]string, 0, len(groups))
+	for groupID := range groups {
+		groupIDs = append(groupIDs, groupID)
+	}
+
+	return groupIDs
 }

route/route.go

@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ type Route struct {
 	NetID               NetID
 	Description         string
 	Peer                string
+	PeerID              string   `gorm:"-"`
 	PeerGroups          []string `gorm:"serializer:json"`
 	NetworkType         NetworkType
 	Masquerade          bool
@@ -120,6 +121,7 @@ func (r *Route) Copy() *Route {
 		KeepRoute:           r.KeepRoute,
 		NetworkType:         r.NetworkType,
 		Peer:                r.Peer,
+		PeerID:              r.PeerID,
 		PeerGroups:          slices.Clone(r.PeerGroups),
 		Metric:              r.Metric,
 		Masquerade:          r.Masquerade,
@@ -146,6 +148,7 @@ func (r *Route) IsEqual(other *Route) bool {
 		other.KeepRoute == r.KeepRoute &&
 		other.NetworkType == r.NetworkType &&
 		other.Peer == r.Peer &&
+		other.PeerID == r.PeerID &&
 		other.Metric == r.Metric &&
 		other.Masquerade == r.Masquerade &&
 		other.Enabled == r.Enabled &&