mirror of
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git
synced 2026-10-30 16:29:09 +01:00
Allow non strict mode
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
package pqkem
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// TestManager_NonCapablePeerNotOffered: a peer known not to run the KEM (it advertised
|
||||
// no PQ port over signalling) is never offered an exchange, and no failure is raised —
|
||||
// this is what stops the reoffer storm against non-PQ peers (e.g. Rosenpass peers).
|
||||
func TestManager_NonCapablePeerNotOffered(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
wg := newFakeWG()
|
||||
d := NewManager("bbbb", wg, nil) // initiator vs "aaaa"
|
||||
d.Start(&loopback{ep: epB, sw: newSwitch()})
|
||||
defer d.Stop()
|
||||
|
||||
d.MarkNonCapable("aaaa")
|
||||
|
||||
offer, err := d.SignalOffer("aaaa")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.Nil(t, offer, "a non-capable peer must not be offered a KEM exchange")
|
||||
require.Empty(t, wg.failed, "a non-capable peer must not raise a rekey failure")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestManager_MarkNonCapableCancelsInFlight: if we start an exchange with a peer whose
|
||||
// capability is not yet known and then learn it does not run the KEM, the in-flight
|
||||
// exchange is cancelled and no further offer is produced (no timeout -> no failure).
|
||||
func TestManager_MarkNonCapableCancelsInFlight(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
wg := newFakeWG()
|
||||
d := NewManager("bbbb", wg, nil)
|
||||
d.Start(&loopback{ep: epB, sw: newSwitch()})
|
||||
defer d.Stop()
|
||||
|
||||
// Capability unknown -> the bootstrap offer goes out optimistically.
|
||||
offer, err := d.SignalOffer("aaaa")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, offer)
|
||||
|
||||
// Now we learn the peer is non-PQ: the exchange must be dropped.
|
||||
d.MarkNonCapable("aaaa")
|
||||
|
||||
next, err := d.SignalOffer("aaaa")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.Nil(t, next, "after learning non-capability the peer is no longer offered")
|
||||
require.Empty(t, wg.failed, "cancelling an in-flight exchange must not raise a failure")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestManager_EstablishedPeerNotDowngraded: a stray zero-port observation must not tear
|
||||
// down a peer we already have a working PQ session with.
|
||||
func TestManager_EstablishedPeerNotDowngraded(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
dA, dB, _, wgB, _ := pair(t)
|
||||
defer dA.Stop()
|
||||
defer dB.Stop()
|
||||
|
||||
bootstrap(t, dA, dB)
|
||||
require.NotEqual(t, PSK{}, wgB.psk("aaaa"), "established a PSK")
|
||||
|
||||
dB.MarkNonCapable("aaaa") // stray zero after establishment
|
||||
|
||||
offer, err := dB.SignalOffer("aaaa")
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
require.NotNil(t, offer, "an established peer must keep running the KEM despite a stray zero")
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ func (m *Manager) processOffer(remoteID RemoteID, o *OfferMsg) ([]byte, error) {
|
||||
ex.lastSent = raw
|
||||
ex.pendingPSK = psk
|
||||
m.psks[remoteID] = psk
|
||||
m.capable[remoteID] = true // a real KEM offer proves the peer runs the exchange
|
||||
m.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
m.trace("pqkem: new PSK derived", "peer", remoteID, "exchange", idHex(o.ExchangeID), "role", "responder", "psk_fp", pskFingerprint(psk))
|
||||
@@ -153,6 +154,7 @@ func (m *Manager) processAnswer(remoteID RemoteID, a *AnswerMsg) error {
|
||||
m.established[remoteID] = true
|
||||
m.failures[remoteID] = 0
|
||||
m.psks[remoteID] = psk
|
||||
m.capable[remoteID] = true // a real KEM answer proves the peer runs the exchange
|
||||
m.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
m.trace("pqkem: new PSK derived", "peer", remoteID, "exchange", idHex(a.ExchangeID), "role", "initiator", "psk_fp", pskFingerprint(psk))
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ type Manager struct {
|
||||
established map[RemoteID]bool // peer has completed at least one exchange
|
||||
failures map[RemoteID]int // consecutive rekey failures per peer
|
||||
psks map[RemoteID]PSK // latest derived PSK per peer (pulled at WG peer-config time)
|
||||
capable map[RemoteID]bool // peer runs the KEM (advertised a PQ port); false = known non-capable
|
||||
peerAddrs map[RemoteID]netip.AddrPort // remoteID -> data-path endpoint (send routing)
|
||||
peersByAddr map[netip.AddrPort]RemoteID // reverse: source endpoint -> remoteID (inbound)
|
||||
wait sync.WaitGroup
|
||||
@@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ func NewManager(localID LocalID, h CallbackHandler, logger *slog.Logger) *Manage
|
||||
established: make(map[RemoteID]bool),
|
||||
failures: make(map[RemoteID]int),
|
||||
psks: make(map[RemoteID]PSK),
|
||||
capable: make(map[RemoteID]bool),
|
||||
peerAddrs: make(map[RemoteID]netip.AddrPort),
|
||||
peersByAddr: make(map[netip.AddrPort]RemoteID),
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -184,7 +186,8 @@ func (m *Manager) trace(msg string, args ...any) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// AddPeer registers where a peer's data-path messages are sent and received: its
|
||||
// overlay endpoint (IP:port).
|
||||
// overlay endpoint (IP:port). A peer that advertises a PQ endpoint is, by that fact,
|
||||
// running the KEM, so it is marked capable.
|
||||
func (m *Manager) AddPeer(remoteID RemoteID, endpoint netip.AddrPort) {
|
||||
if !endpoint.IsValid() {
|
||||
return
|
||||
@@ -195,9 +198,35 @@ func (m *Manager) AddPeer(remoteID RemoteID, endpoint netip.AddrPort) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
m.peerAddrs[remoteID] = endpoint
|
||||
m.peersByAddr[endpoint] = remoteID
|
||||
m.capable[remoteID] = true
|
||||
m.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// MarkNonCapable records that a peer does not run the KEM: it answered our offer with
|
||||
// no KEM material over signalling (the capability signal is the peer's payload, not its
|
||||
// optional data-path port). Any in-flight exchange is cancelled and further offers are
|
||||
// suppressed (see SignalOffer), so a non-PQ peer never drives the rekey-recovery storm.
|
||||
// An already-established peer is left untouched — a stray empty answer must not tear
|
||||
// down a working PQ session.
|
||||
func (m *Manager) MarkNonCapable(remoteID RemoteID) {
|
||||
m.mu.Lock()
|
||||
defer m.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
if m.established[remoteID] {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
if prev, ok := m.capable[remoteID]; ok && !prev {
|
||||
return // already known non-capable, nothing to do
|
||||
}
|
||||
m.capable[remoteID] = false
|
||||
if ex := m.exchanges[remoteID]; ex != nil {
|
||||
if ex.cancel != nil {
|
||||
ex.cancel()
|
||||
}
|
||||
delete(m.exchanges, remoteID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
m.trace("pqkem: peer advertises no PQ service — treating as non-capable, no KEM attempted", "peer", remoteID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// RemovePeer stops any in-flight exchange for a peer and drops its state and routing.
|
||||
func (m *Manager) RemovePeer(remoteID RemoteID) {
|
||||
m.mu.Lock()
|
||||
@@ -210,6 +239,7 @@ func (m *Manager) RemovePeer(remoteID RemoteID) {
|
||||
delete(m.established, remoteID)
|
||||
delete(m.failures, remoteID)
|
||||
delete(m.psks, remoteID)
|
||||
delete(m.capable, remoteID)
|
||||
if ep, ok := m.peerAddrs[remoteID]; ok {
|
||||
delete(m.peersByAddr, ep)
|
||||
delete(m.peerAddrs, remoteID)
|
||||
@@ -246,6 +276,10 @@ func (m *Manager) SignalOffer(remoteID RemoteID) ([]byte, error) {
|
||||
return nil, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
m.mu.Lock()
|
||||
if capable, ok := m.capable[remoteID]; ok && !capable {
|
||||
m.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
return nil, nil // peer does not run the KEM; do not offer (avoids a failure/reoffer loop)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ex := m.exchanges[remoteID]; ex != nil && ex.viaSignal && ex.state == stateAwaitingAnswer {
|
||||
last := ex.lastSent
|
||||
m.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user