Adds Gate Login as well when --disable-update-settings=true is given to service

This commit tries to settle things with an old PR-4237 which had relaxed
the case where the SetConfig returned an `Unavailable` code error.

Under this circumnstance the PR allowed the upFunc to just emit a warning and
progress further with the login gRPC. Since the login call is consuming
the --management-url coming from the `up` command, it might be possible
to abuse the "Unavailable" code to inject a management URL that is different
from the configured one even though the --disable-update-settings is set
to true (?)
This commit is contained in:
riccardom
2026-06-08 18:06:02 +02:00
parent 1b477d39a8
commit b200f47e6d
2 changed files with 115 additions and 0 deletions
+16
View File
@@ -440,6 +440,22 @@ func (s *Server) SetConfig(callerCtx context.Context, msg *proto.SetConfigReques
// Login uses setup key to prepare configuration for the daemon.
func (s *Server) Login(callerCtx context.Context, msg *proto.LoginRequest) (*proto.LoginResponse, error) {
// Config-override gates. LoginRequest carries the same surface as
// SetConfigRequest (managementUrl, PSK, ssh/rosenpass/port toggles,
// ...), so the same protections must apply. Without these the CLI
// command `netbird up --management-url=X` (which falls through to
// Login when SetConfig is rejected — see cmd/up.go) would silently
// bypass `--disable-update-settings` and any MDM policy.
if loginRequestHasConfigOverrides(msg) {
if s.checkUpdateSettingsDisabled() {
return nil, gstatus.Errorf(codes.Unavailable, errUpdateSettingsDisabled)
}
policy := loadMDMPolicy()
if err := rejectMDMManagedFieldConflicts(policy, loginRequestMDMConflicts(msg, policy)); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
}
s.mutex.Lock()
if s.actCancel != nil {
s.actCancel()