[management] network map for affected peers (#6105)

This commit is contained in:
Pascal Fischer
2026-06-15 17:43:22 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent e7c1d364c3
commit 967e2d6864
39 changed files with 5841 additions and 667 deletions
+25 -67
View File
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ import (
_ "embed"
"github.com/rs/xid"
"github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
log "github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/permissions/modules"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/permissions/operations"
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ import (
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/types"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/activity"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/affectedpeers"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/posture"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/shared/management/status"
)
@@ -45,44 +46,47 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) SavePolicy(ctx context.Context, accountID, user
}
var isUpdate = policy.ID != ""
var updateAccountPeers bool
var existingPolicy *types.Policy
var action = activity.PolicyAdded
var unchanged bool
var snap *affectedpeers.Snapshot
var change affectedpeers.Change
err = am.Store.ExecuteInTransaction(ctx, func(transaction store.Store) error {
existingPolicy, err := validatePolicy(ctx, transaction, accountID, policy)
existingPolicy, err = validatePolicy(ctx, transaction, accountID, policy)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if isUpdate {
if policy.Equal(existingPolicy) {
logrus.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("policy update skipped because equal to stored one - policy id %s", policy.ID)
log.WithContext(ctx).Tracef("policy update skipped because equal to stored one - policy id %s", policy.ID)
unchanged = true
return nil
}
action = activity.PolicyUpdated
updateAccountPeers, err = arePolicyChangesAffectPeersWithExisting(ctx, transaction, policy, existingPolicy)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err = transaction.SavePolicy(ctx, policy); err != nil {
return err
}
} else {
updateAccountPeers, err = arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx, transaction, policy)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err = transaction.CreatePolicy(ctx, policy); err != nil {
return err
}
}
// On update carry both the old and new policy so peers losing access via a
// removed rule still refresh; on create there is no prior policy.
if isUpdate {
change = affectedpeers.Change{Policies: []*types.Policy{existingPolicy, policy}}
} else {
change = affectedpeers.Change{Policies: []*types.Policy{policy}}
}
if snap, err = affectedpeers.Load(ctx, transaction, accountID, change); err != nil {
return err
}
return transaction.IncrementNetworkSerial(ctx, accountID)
})
if err != nil {
@@ -95,13 +99,7 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) SavePolicy(ctx context.Context, accountID, user
am.StoreEvent(ctx, userID, policy.ID, accountID, action, policy.EventMeta())
if updateAccountPeers {
policyOp := types.UpdateOperationCreate
if isUpdate {
policyOp = types.UpdateOperationUpdate
}
am.UpdateAccountPeers(ctx, accountID, types.UpdateReason{Resource: types.UpdateResourcePolicy, Operation: policyOp})
}
am.ExpandAndUpdateAffected(ctx, accountID, snap, change)
return policy, nil
}
@@ -117,7 +115,8 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) DeletePolicy(ctx context.Context, accountID, po
}
var policy *types.Policy
var updateAccountPeers bool
var snap *affectedpeers.Snapshot
change := affectedpeers.Change{}
err = am.Store.ExecuteInTransaction(ctx, func(transaction store.Store) error {
policy, err = transaction.GetPolicyByID(ctx, store.LockingStrengthUpdate, accountID, policyID)
@@ -125,8 +124,9 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) DeletePolicy(ctx context.Context, accountID, po
return err
}
updateAccountPeers, err = arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx, transaction, policy)
if err != nil {
// Load before delete: pre-state still references the policy.
change = affectedpeers.Change{Policies: []*types.Policy{policy}}
if snap, err = affectedpeers.Load(ctx, transaction, accountID, change); err != nil {
return err
}
@@ -142,9 +142,7 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) DeletePolicy(ctx context.Context, accountID, po
am.StoreEvent(ctx, userID, policyID, accountID, activity.PolicyRemoved, policy.EventMeta())
if updateAccountPeers {
am.UpdateAccountPeers(ctx, accountID, types.UpdateReason{Resource: types.UpdateResourcePolicy, Operation: types.UpdateOperationDelete})
}
am.ExpandAndUpdateAffected(ctx, accountID, snap, change)
return nil
}
@@ -162,46 +160,6 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) ListPolicies(ctx context.Context, accountID, us
return am.Store.GetAccountPolicies(ctx, store.LockingStrengthNone, accountID)
}
// arePolicyChangesAffectPeers checks if a policy (being created or deleted) will affect any associated peers.
func arePolicyChangesAffectPeers(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, policy *types.Policy) (bool, error) {
for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
if rule.SourceResource.Type != "" || rule.DestinationResource.Type != "" {
return true, nil
}
}
return anyGroupHasPeersOrResources(ctx, transaction, policy.AccountID, policy.RuleGroups())
}
func arePolicyChangesAffectPeersWithExisting(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, policy *types.Policy, existingPolicy *types.Policy) (bool, error) {
if !policy.Enabled && !existingPolicy.Enabled {
return false, nil
}
for _, rule := range existingPolicy.Rules {
if rule.SourceResource.Type != "" || rule.DestinationResource.Type != "" {
return true, nil
}
}
hasPeers, err := anyGroupHasPeersOrResources(ctx, transaction, policy.AccountID, existingPolicy.RuleGroups())
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if hasPeers {
return true, nil
}
for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
if rule.SourceResource.Type != "" || rule.DestinationResource.Type != "" {
return true, nil
}
}
return anyGroupHasPeersOrResources(ctx, transaction, policy.AccountID, policy.RuleGroups())
}
// validatePolicy validates the policy and its rules. For updates it returns
// the existing policy loaded from the store so callers can avoid a second read.
func validatePolicy(ctx context.Context, transaction store.Store, accountID string, policy *types.Policy) (*types.Policy, error) {