mirror of
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git
synced 2026-09-24 07:39:07 +02:00
Restrict rule authorization to accept rules, the destination side for SSH, and the marker protocol's own port
This commit is contained in:
@@ -16,18 +16,36 @@ type authRequirements struct {
|
||||
needAllowedUserIDs bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// collectFor records what rule needs to resolve its authorized users, for a
|
||||
// peer the resolver will authorize under it.
|
||||
// collectFor records what rule needs to resolve its authorized users, for the
|
||||
// peer named by peerInSources/peerInDestinations. It collects nothing for a
|
||||
// peer the resolver will not authorize under the rule, so the components do not
|
||||
// carry the account's user list to a peer that has no use for it.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The sides mirror ApplyResolvedRuleToState: SSH authorization follows the
|
||||
// destination alone, while a bidirectional VNC rule also authorizes its source
|
||||
// side, because the Noise_IK handshake needs the session key on both ends. A
|
||||
// rule that is not an accept authorizes nobody on either side.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Both marker protocols resolve users the same way, so a VNC rule needs exactly
|
||||
// what an SSH rule needs: the group-to-user mapping when the rule names groups,
|
||||
// the account's allowed-user set when it names nobody, and nothing at all when
|
||||
// it carries its own user.
|
||||
func (a *authRequirements) collectFor(rule *nmdata.PolicyRule, peerSSHEnabled bool) {
|
||||
isMarkerRule := rule.Protocol == string(types.PolicyRuleProtocolNetbirdSSH) ||
|
||||
rule.Protocol == string(types.PolicyRuleProtocolNetbirdVNC)
|
||||
if !isMarkerRule {
|
||||
if nmdata.PolicyRuleImpliesLegacySSH(rule) && peerSSHEnabled {
|
||||
func (a *authRequirements) collectFor(rule *nmdata.PolicyRule, peerSSHEnabled, peerInSources, peerInDestinations bool) {
|
||||
if rule.Action != string(types.PolicyTrafficActionAccept) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch rule.Protocol {
|
||||
case string(types.PolicyRuleProtocolNetbirdVNC):
|
||||
if !peerInDestinations && !(rule.Bidirectional && peerInSources) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
case string(types.PolicyRuleProtocolNetbirdSSH):
|
||||
if !peerInDestinations {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
if peerInDestinations && nmdata.PolicyRuleImpliesLegacySSH(rule) && peerSSHEnabled {
|
||||
a.needAllowedUserIDs = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
return
|
||||
@@ -393,14 +411,7 @@ func (nmd *NetworkMapData) getPeersGroupsPoliciesRoutes(
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Collected for whichever side the resolver will actually authorize:
|
||||
// a bidirectional rule grants access in both directions, so a peer
|
||||
// that appears only in Sources is authorized too. Gating this on
|
||||
// peerInDestinations alone leaves that peer's rule reaching the
|
||||
// resolver with none of the inputs it needs to name a user.
|
||||
if peerInDestinations || (rule.Bidirectional && peerInSources) {
|
||||
authReqs.collectFor(rule, peerSSHEnabled)
|
||||
}
|
||||
authReqs.collectFor(rule, peerSSHEnabled, peerInSources, peerInDestinations)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if policyRelevant {
|
||||
relevantPolicies = append(relevantPolicies, policy)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user