Unify peer and route ACL filtering with multi-source peer rules

This commit is contained in:
Viktor Liu
2026-06-02 10:50:53 +02:00
parent 9189625487
commit 38603c7552
64 changed files with 7314 additions and 6127 deletions
+57 -49
View File
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
//go:build integration && !android
package iptables
import (
@@ -65,46 +67,39 @@ func TestIptablesManager(t *testing.T) {
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}()
var rule2 []fw.Rule
var rule2 fw.Rule
t.Run("add second rule", func(t *testing.T) {
ip := netip.MustParseAddr("10.20.0.3")
port := &fw.Port{
IsRange: true,
Values: []uint16{8043, 8046},
}
rule2, err = manager.AddPeerFiltering(nil, ip.AsSlice(), "tcp", port, nil, fw.ActionAccept, "")
rule2, err = manager.AddFilterRule(nil, pfx(ip.AsSlice()), fw.Network{}, "tcp", port, nil, fw.ActionAccept)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add rule")
for _, r := range rule2 {
rr := r.(*Rule)
checkRuleSpecs(t, ipv4Client, rr.chain, true, rr.specs...)
}
rr := rule2.(*Rule)
checkRuleSpecs(t, ipv4Client, rr.chain, true, rr.specs...)
})
t.Run("delete second rule", func(t *testing.T) {
for _, r := range rule2 {
err := manager.DeletePeerRule(r)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to delete rule")
}
require.Empty(t, manager.aclMgr.ipsetStore.ipsets, "rulesets index after removed second rule must be empty")
require.NoError(t, manager.DeleteFilterRule(rule2), "failed to delete rule")
})
t.Run("reset check", func(t *testing.T) {
// add second rule
ip := netip.MustParseAddr("10.20.0.3")
port := &fw.Port{Values: []uint16{5353}}
_, err = manager.AddPeerFiltering(nil, ip.AsSlice(), "udp", nil, port, fw.ActionAccept, "")
_, err = manager.AddFilterRule(nil, pfx(ip.AsSlice()), fw.Network{}, "udp", nil, port, fw.ActionAccept)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add rule")
err = manager.Close(nil)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to reset")
ok, err := ipv4Client.ChainExists("filter", chainNameInputRules)
ok, err := ipv4Client.ChainExists("filter", chainACLInput)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed check chain exists")
if ok {
require.NoErrorf(t, err, "chain '%v' still exists after Close", chainNameInputRules)
require.NoErrorf(t, err, "chain '%v' still exists after Close", chainACLInput)
}
})
}
@@ -126,15 +121,13 @@ func TestIptablesManagerDenyRules(t *testing.T) {
ip := netip.MustParseAddr("10.20.0.3")
port := &fw.Port{Values: []uint16{22}}
rule, err := manager.AddPeerFiltering(nil, ip.AsSlice(), "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionDrop, "deny-ssh")
rule, err := manager.AddFilterRule(nil, pfx(ip.AsSlice()), fw.Network{}, "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionDrop)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add deny rule")
require.NotEmpty(t, rule, "deny rule should not be empty")
require.NotNil(t, rule, "deny rule should not be nil")
// Verify the rule was added by checking iptables
for _, r := range rule {
rr := r.(*Rule)
checkRuleSpecs(t, ipv4Client, rr.chain, true, rr.specs...)
}
rr := rule.(*Rule)
checkRuleSpecs(t, ipv4Client, rr.chain, true, rr.specs...)
})
t.Run("deny rule precedence test", func(t *testing.T) {
@@ -142,36 +135,40 @@ func TestIptablesManagerDenyRules(t *testing.T) {
port := &fw.Port{Values: []uint16{80}}
// Add accept rule first
_, err := manager.AddPeerFiltering(nil, ip.AsSlice(), "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionAccept, "accept-http")
_, err := manager.AddFilterRule(nil, pfx(ip.AsSlice()), fw.Network{}, "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionAccept)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add accept rule")
// Add deny rule second for same IP/port - this should take precedence
_, err = manager.AddPeerFiltering(nil, ip.AsSlice(), "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionDrop, "deny-http")
_, err = manager.AddFilterRule(nil, pfx(ip.AsSlice()), fw.Network{}, "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionDrop)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add deny rule")
// Inspect the actual iptables rules to verify deny rule comes before accept rule
rules, err := ipv4Client.List("filter", chainNameInputRules)
rules, err := ipv4Client.List("filter", chainACLInput)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to list iptables rules")
// Debug: print all rules
t.Logf("All iptables rules in chain %s:", chainNameInputRules)
t.Logf("All iptables rules in chain %s:", chainACLInput)
for i, rule := range rules {
t.Logf(" [%d] %s", i, rule)
}
// Single-source rules emit a direct `-s <ip>/32 ... --dport 80`
// match. Match on that shape instead of the legacy
// per-(action,port) ipset names ("deny-http"/"accept-http")
// that this test predates.
srcMatch := fmt.Sprintf("-s %s/32", ip)
var denyRuleIndex, acceptRuleIndex = -1, -1
for i, rule := range rules {
if strings.Contains(rule, "DROP") {
t.Logf("Found DROP rule at index %d: %s", i, rule)
if strings.Contains(rule, "deny-http") && strings.Contains(rule, "80") {
denyRuleIndex = i
}
if !strings.Contains(rule, srcMatch) || !strings.Contains(rule, "--dport 80") {
continue
}
if strings.Contains(rule, "ACCEPT") {
if strings.Contains(rule, "-j DROP") {
t.Logf("Found DROP rule at index %d: %s", i, rule)
denyRuleIndex = i
}
if strings.Contains(rule, "-j ACCEPT") {
t.Logf("Found ACCEPT rule at index %d: %s", i, rule)
if strings.Contains(rule, "accept-http") && strings.Contains(rule, "80") {
acceptRuleIndex = i
}
acceptRuleIndex = i
}
}
@@ -196,7 +193,6 @@ func TestIptablesManagerIPSet(t *testing.T) {
},
}
// just check on the local interface
manager, err := Create(mock, iface.DefaultMTU)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NoError(t, manager.Init(nil))
@@ -210,27 +206,39 @@ func TestIptablesManagerIPSet(t *testing.T) {
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}()
var rule2 []fw.Rule
t.Run("add second rule", func(t *testing.T) {
var rule2 fw.Rule
t.Run("single source uses direct -s match (no ipset)", func(t *testing.T) {
ip := netip.MustParseAddr("10.20.0.3")
port := &fw.Port{
Values: []uint16{443},
}
rule2, err = manager.AddPeerFiltering(nil, ip.AsSlice(), "tcp", port, nil, fw.ActionAccept, "default")
for _, r := range rule2 {
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add rule")
require.Equal(t, r.(*Rule).ipsetName, "default-sport", "ipset name must be set")
require.Equal(t, r.(*Rule).ip, "10.20.0.3", "ipset IP must be set")
}
rule2, err = manager.AddFilterRule(nil, pfx(ip.AsSlice()), fw.Network{}, "tcp", port, nil, fw.ActionAccept)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add rule")
require.NotNil(t, rule2)
require.Contains(t, rule2.(*Rule).specs, "-s",
"single-source rule should use direct -s match, not an ipset")
require.Empty(t, findSets(rule2.(*Rule).specs),
"single-source rule should not allocate a shared ipset")
})
t.Run("delete second rule", func(t *testing.T) {
for _, r := range rule2 {
err := manager.DeletePeerRule(r)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to delete rule")
t.Run("delete single-source rule", func(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, manager.DeleteFilterRule(rule2), "failed to delete rule")
})
require.Empty(t, manager.aclMgr.ipsetStore.ipsets, "rulesets index after removed second rule must be empty")
t.Run("multi-source uses shared ipset", func(t *testing.T) {
sources := []netip.Prefix{
netip.PrefixFrom(netip.MustParseAddr("10.20.0.3"), 32),
netip.PrefixFrom(netip.MustParseAddr("10.20.0.4"), 32),
netip.PrefixFrom(netip.MustParseAddr("10.20.0.5"), 32),
}
port := &fw.Port{Values: []uint16{8080}}
multi, err := manager.AddFilterRule(nil, sources, fw.Network{}, "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionAccept)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add multi-source rule")
require.NotNil(t, multi, "multi-source rule must produce one iptables rule")
sets := findSets(multi.(*Rule).specs)
require.Len(t, sets, 1, "multi-source rule must reference exactly one ipset")
require.NoError(t, manager.DeleteFilterRule(multi))
})
t.Run("reset check", func(t *testing.T) {
@@ -281,7 +289,7 @@ func TestIptablesCreatePerformance(t *testing.T) {
start := time.Now()
for i := 0; i < testMax; i++ {
port := &fw.Port{Values: []uint16{uint16(1000 + i)}}
_, err = manager.AddPeerFiltering(nil, ip.AsSlice(), "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionAccept, "")
_, err = manager.AddFilterRule(nil, pfx(ip.AsSlice()), fw.Network{}, "tcp", nil, port, fw.ActionAccept)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to add rule")
}