mirror of
https://github.com/certctl-io/certctl.git
synced 2026-08-29 18:01:24 +02:00
# Phase 9 — approval-bypass closure (Decision 9, option a)
* Migration 000033_approval_kinds.up.sql: ALTER TABLE
issuance_approval_requests ADD COLUMN approval_kind +
payload JSONB; relax certificate_id + job_id to nullable;
CHECK (approval_kind IN ('cert_issuance','profile_edit'))
+ CHECK (per-kind nullability invariant) + index on
approval_kind. Idempotent throughout via DO blocks.
* domain.ApprovalKind enum (cert_issuance / profile_edit) +
IsValidApprovalKind. ApprovalRequest gains Kind +
Payload []byte for the pending profile diff.
* postgres.ApprovalRepository.Create + scanApprovalRow extended
to round-trip the new columns; certificate_id + job_id
switched to sql.NullString so profile_edit rows persist
cleanly. Default Kind=cert_issuance preserves back-compat
for every Phase-7-2026-05-03 caller.
* ApprovalService.RequestProfileEditApproval: new entry point
that creates a pending profile-edit row carrying the
serialized profile diff. Bypass mode (CERTCTL_APPROVAL_BYPASS)
short-circuits the same way it does for cert_issuance.
* ApprovalService.SetProfileEditApply hook: cmd/server/main.go
registers a closure that deserializes req.Payload + persists
via profileRepo.Update + emits a profile.edit_applied audit
row with category=auth. The hook avoids the Approval ↔
Profile import cycle.
* ProfileService.UpdateProfile: gates when (a) the live
profile carries RequiresApproval=true, OR (b) the proposed
edit would set it true. Returns ErrProfileEditPendingApproval
with the new approval ID; ProfileHandler maps to HTTP 202
Accepted + {pending_approval_id}. Both arms close the
flip-flop loophole because every transition through an
approval-tier profile fires the gate.
* TestProfileEdit_RequiresApprovalLoopholeClosed pins all 3
bypass attempts (flip-off / kept-on / flip-on) gated; nil-
approval-service preserves pre-Phase-9 direct-apply for
test fixtures.
* Approval service tests gain 4 profile_edit rows: pending row
shape; same-actor self-approve rejected with
ErrApproveBySameActor (load-bearing two-person integrity);
approve fails-closed when apply callback unwired;
apply callback invoked on approve.
* docs/reference/profiles.md (new) explains the gate +
edit response shape (202) + same-actor invariant + bypass
+ audit hooks.
# Phase 10 — RBAC management GUI
* useAuthMe hook (web/src/hooks/useAuthMe.ts): TanStack Query
fetches /api/v1/auth/me on app boot, caches for 60s, exposes
hasPerm(p) + hasAnyPerm + isAdmin predicates. Every Phase-10
page consumes this on mount + gates affordances against the
cached effective_permissions slice. Server-side enforcement
is the load-bearing gate; client-side hide/disable is UX.
* New routes:
- /auth/roles — list (auth.role.list); create-role modal
(auth.role.create) hidden when missing.
- /auth/roles/:id — detail + permissions; edit
(auth.role.edit), delete (auth.role.delete), add/remove
permission affordances each gated.
- /auth/keys — list of every actor with role grants; assign
+ revoke modals (auth.role.assign). actor-demo-anon
flagged system-managed; mutation buttons hidden for it.
- /auth/settings — stub showing /v1/auth/me identity +
bootstrap-endpoint availability via /v1/auth/bootstrap.
* AuditPage extended with category filter ('All categories'
+ the 3 enum values from migration 000032). Selection flows
to the API call params + the URL-driven query state.
* Layout: 3 new nav entries (Roles / API Keys / Auth Settings).
* api/client.ts: 12 new exported functions for the RBAC
surface (authMe, list/get/create/update/delete role,
list/add/remove role permissions, list keys, assign/revoke
key role, bootstrap-availability probe).
* data-testid attributes on every interactive element so a
future Playwright suite can assert behavior without brittle
CSS selectors.
* Empty state, error state, and unsaved-changes warnings on
every form per the prompt's implementation rules.
# Frontend tests
* RolesPage.test.tsx (6 tests): list render, empty state,
error state, hide-create-button-without-perm,
show-create-button-with-perm, submit-create-modal.
* KeysPage.test.tsx (3 tests): demo-anon flagged
system-managed (no buttons), permission-gated affordance
hide for auditor caller, assign-modal-POST contract.
* AuthSettingsPage.test.tsx (2 tests): identity surface,
bootstrap-OPEN-status surface.
* AuditPage.test.tsx (+1): category-filter select renders
with the 4 documented options.
15 frontend tests total in src/pages/auth/ + the audit
category-filter test; all pass via npx vitest run.
# Verifications
* go vet ./... clean.
* staticcheck across internal/auth + handler + router + cli +
service + repository + cmd + domain: clean.
* gofmt -l clean repo-wide.
* go test -short -count=1 green across internal/service,
internal/api/handler, internal/api/router, internal/auth,
internal/auth/bootstrap, internal/service/auth,
internal/domain/auth, cmd/server, cmd/cli, internal/cli.
* npx tsc --noEmit clean.
* npm run build green (vite build produces dist/index.html
+ 946KB JS bundle; chunk-size warning is pre-existing).
* npx vitest run src/pages/auth/ src/pages/AuditPage.test.tsx
green (15 tests, 4 files).
172 lines
5.7 KiB
TypeScript
172 lines
5.7 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest';
|
|
import { render, screen, waitFor, fireEvent, cleanup } from '@testing-library/react';
|
|
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from '@tanstack/react-query';
|
|
import { MemoryRouter } from 'react-router-dom';
|
|
import type { ReactNode } from 'react';
|
|
|
|
// =============================================================================
|
|
// Bundle 1 Phase 10 — RolesPage Vitest coverage. Pins:
|
|
// - List renders when authListRoles resolves.
|
|
// - Empty state renders when the list is empty.
|
|
// - "Create role" button is HIDDEN when the caller lacks
|
|
// auth.role.create. Server-side enforcement is the load-bearing
|
|
// gate; this test pins the UX hide.
|
|
// - "Create role" button is SHOWN when the caller has the perm.
|
|
// - Submitting the create modal calls authCreateRole.
|
|
// - Error state renders when authListRoles rejects.
|
|
// =============================================================================
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../../api/client', () => ({
|
|
authListRoles: vi.fn(),
|
|
authCreateRole: vi.fn(),
|
|
authMe: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
import RolesPage from './RolesPage';
|
|
import * as client from '../../api/client';
|
|
|
|
function renderWithProviders(ui: ReactNode) {
|
|
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
|
|
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false }, mutations: { retry: false } },
|
|
});
|
|
return render(
|
|
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
|
|
<MemoryRouter>{ui}</MemoryRouter>
|
|
</QueryClientProvider>,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
cleanup();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const sampleRoles = [
|
|
{ id: 'r-admin', tenant_id: 't-default', name: 'admin', description: 'Full access' },
|
|
{ id: 'r-viewer', tenant_id: 't-default', name: 'viewer', description: 'Read-only' },
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
describe('RolesPage', () => {
|
|
it('renders the role list from authListRoles', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authListRoles).mockResolvedValue(sampleRoles);
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authMe).mockResolvedValue({
|
|
actor_id: 'alice',
|
|
actor_type: 'APIKey',
|
|
tenant_id: 't-default',
|
|
admin: true,
|
|
roles: ['r-admin'],
|
|
effective_permissions: [{ permission: 'auth.role.create', scope_type: 'global' }],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
renderWithProviders(<RolesPage />);
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(screen.getByTestId('roles-table')).toBeTruthy();
|
|
});
|
|
expect(screen.getByText('admin')).toBeTruthy();
|
|
expect(screen.getByText('viewer')).toBeTruthy();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('shows the create button when the caller has auth.role.create', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authListRoles).mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authMe).mockResolvedValue({
|
|
actor_id: 'alice',
|
|
actor_type: 'APIKey',
|
|
tenant_id: 't-default',
|
|
admin: false,
|
|
roles: ['r-operator'],
|
|
effective_permissions: [{ permission: 'auth.role.create', scope_type: 'global' }],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
renderWithProviders(<RolesPage />);
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(screen.queryByTestId('roles-create-button')).toBeTruthy();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('hides the create button when the caller lacks auth.role.create', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authListRoles).mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authMe).mockResolvedValue({
|
|
actor_id: 'audrey',
|
|
actor_type: 'APIKey',
|
|
tenant_id: 't-default',
|
|
admin: false,
|
|
roles: ['r-auditor'],
|
|
effective_permissions: [{ permission: 'audit.read', scope_type: 'global' }],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
renderWithProviders(<RolesPage />);
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(screen.getByTestId('roles-empty')).toBeTruthy());
|
|
expect(screen.queryByTestId('roles-create-button')).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('renders the empty state when the list is empty', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authListRoles).mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authMe).mockResolvedValue({
|
|
actor_id: 'alice',
|
|
actor_type: 'APIKey',
|
|
tenant_id: 't-default',
|
|
admin: true,
|
|
roles: ['r-admin'],
|
|
effective_permissions: [],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
renderWithProviders(<RolesPage />);
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(screen.getByTestId('roles-empty')).toBeTruthy());
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('submits the create modal via authCreateRole', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authListRoles).mockResolvedValue([]);
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authCreateRole).mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: 'r-release',
|
|
tenant_id: 't-default',
|
|
name: 'release-manager',
|
|
});
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authMe).mockResolvedValue({
|
|
actor_id: 'alice',
|
|
actor_type: 'APIKey',
|
|
tenant_id: 't-default',
|
|
admin: true,
|
|
roles: ['r-admin'],
|
|
effective_permissions: [{ permission: 'auth.role.create', scope_type: 'global' }],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
renderWithProviders(<RolesPage />);
|
|
await waitFor(() => screen.getByTestId('roles-create-button'));
|
|
fireEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('roles-create-button'));
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => screen.getByTestId('create-role-modal'));
|
|
fireEvent.change(screen.getByTestId('create-role-name'), {
|
|
target: { value: 'release-manager' },
|
|
});
|
|
fireEvent.change(screen.getByTestId('create-role-description'), {
|
|
target: { value: 'Cuts releases' },
|
|
});
|
|
fireEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('create-role-submit'));
|
|
|
|
await waitFor(() => {
|
|
expect(client.authCreateRole).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
name: 'release-manager',
|
|
description: 'Cuts releases',
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('renders the error state when authListRoles rejects', async () => {
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authListRoles).mockRejectedValue(new Error('boom'));
|
|
vi.mocked(client.authMe).mockResolvedValue({
|
|
actor_id: 'alice',
|
|
actor_type: 'APIKey',
|
|
tenant_id: 't-default',
|
|
admin: true,
|
|
roles: ['r-admin'],
|
|
effective_permissions: [],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
renderWithProviders(<RolesPage />);
|
|
await waitFor(() => expect(screen.getByText(/failed to load/i)).toBeTruthy());
|
|
});
|
|
});
|